{"id":6136,"date":"2009-11-27T11:03:45","date_gmt":"2009-11-27T16:03:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=6136"},"modified":"2020-05-09T13:59:42","modified_gmt":"2020-05-09T18:59:42","slug":"seed-beds-of-style","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2009\/11\/27\/seed-beds-of-style\/","title":{"rendered":"Seed-beds of style"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Red<\/p>\n

\"Red<\/p>\n

\"Red<\/p>\n

The Hunt for Red October.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

DB here:<\/p>\n

Seminar<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span>, orig. German (1889): A class that meets for systematic study under the direction of a teacher. From Latin <\/span><\/strong><\/span>seminarium<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span>, \u201cseed-plot.\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

I retired from full-time teaching in July of 2005. Since then, while writing and traveling (both chronicled on this website), I\u2019ve done occasional lectures. But this fall I tried something else. At the invitation of Lea Jacobs here at Madison, I collaborated with her on a graduate seminar called Film Stylistics.<\/p>\n

It was a good opportunity for me. I had a chance to learn from Lea, Ben Brewster, and the students and sitters-in. The class also enabled me to test and revise some ideas I\u2019d already explored, while garnering new ideas and information.\u00a0I helped plan the sessions and pick the films, but I had no responsibilities about grading.\u00a0I hope, though, to read the students\u2019 papers at some point after the term is over.<\/p>\n

Our goal was to introduce students to studying style historically and conceptually. We focused on group styles rather than \u201cauthorial\u201d ones because we wanted to explore particular concepts. How useful is the concept of group norms<\/strong> in understanding broad stylistic trends? Can we explain stylistic change through conceptions of progress <\/strong>toward some norm? Does the model of problem and solution<\/strong> help explain not only a particular innovation but also the group\u2019s acceptance of it? How viable are notions of influence <\/strong>in explaining change? How much power should we assign to individual innovation<\/strong>? Can we think of filmmaking institutions as not only constraining style (through tradition and conformity) but also enabling certain possibilities\u2014nudging filmmakers in certain directions? Does stylistic study favor a comparative method<\/strong>, one that encourages us to range across major and minor films, as well as different countries and periods?<\/p>\n

These are pretty abstract questions, so we wanted some particular cases. Lea and I picked three areas of broad stylistic change: the emergence of widescreen cinema in the 1950s, the arrival of sync-sound filming in the late 1920s, and the development of analytical editing or \u201cscene dissection\u201d in the 1910s and 1920s. We tackled these areas in this order, violating chronology because we wanted to move from somewhat hard problems to the hardest of all: Why did filmmakers in the US, and soon in other countries, move toward what has become the lingua franca of film technique, continuity editing?<\/p>\n

The results of our research on these matters will emerge over the next few years, I expect. In the short term, during my final lecture Tuesday I went off on what I hope wasn\u2019t too much of a tangent. I got interested in one particular kind of cut, and it led me to see, once more, how different filmmaking traditions can make varying uses of apparently similar techniques.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

More cutting remarks<\/strong><\/p>\n

My concern was the axial cut. That\u2019s a cut that shifts the framing straight along the lens axis. Usually, the cut carries us \u201cstraight in\u201d from a long shot to a closer view, but it can also cut \u201cstraight back\u201d from a detail. What could be simpler? Yet such an almost primitive device harbors intriguing expressive possibilities.<\/p>\n

Axial cuts aren\u2019t all that common nowadays, I think. Today\u2019s filmmakers prefer to change the angle when they cut to a closer or more distant setup. But such wasn\u2019t the case in the cinema of the 1910s and 1920s.<\/p>\n

In the heyday of tableau-based staging, 1908-1918 or so, filmmakers seldom cut into the scene at all. European directors especially tended to shape the development of the action by moving actors around the set, shifting them closer to the camera or farther away. The most common cuts were \u201cinserts\u201d of details, mostly printed matter (letters, telegrams) or a photograph. But when tableau scenes did cut into the players, the cuts tended to be axial: the framing moved straight in to enlarge a moment of performance. Here’s an instance from the 1916 Russian film Nelly Raintseva.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Nelly \"Nelly<\/p>\n

During the mid-1910s, American films moved away from the tableau style toward a more editing-driven technique. This approach often relied on more angled framing and a greater penetration of the playing space, of the kind we’re familiar with today. But axial cuts hung on in American films, even in quickly-cut scenes. Lea pointed out some nice examples in Wild and Woolly<\/em> (1917), especially those involving movement. In the example below, the first cut carries us backward rather than forward, and the second is a cut-in, but both are along the lens axis.<\/p>\n

\"W \"W<\/p>\n

\"W<\/p>\n

During the 1920s, axial cuts become a secondary tool of the American filmmaker, who now had many other camera setups available. But Soviet filmmakers of the 1920s, who adopted many American techniques in the name of modernizing their cinema, seemed to see fresh possibilities in the axial cut. For instance, in Dovzhenko\u2019s Arsenal<\/em> (1929), it becomes a percussive accent. The astonishment of a bureaucrat under siege is conveyed by a string of very fast enlargements.<\/p>\n

\"Arsenal \"Ars<\/p>\n

\"Arsenal \"Arsenal<\/p>\n

The Soviets called such cuts \u201cconcentration cuts,\u201d a good term for the way they make a figure seem to pop out at us. From being a simple enlargement (in tableau cinema) or one among many methods of penetrating the scene\u2019s space (in Hollywood continuity), the axial cut has been given a new force, thanks to adding more shots and making them quite brief.<\/p>\n

This aggressive method for seizing our eye\u2014Notice this now!<\/em>\u2014has appeared in modern filmmaking too, as in this passage from Die Hard<\/em> (1988).<\/p>\n

\"Die<\/p>\n

\"Die<\/p>\n

\"Die<\/p>\n

\"Die<\/p>\n

Here the axial cut is clearly subjective, rendering John McClane\u2019s realization that he can use the Christmas wrapping tape in his combat with the thieves. Director John McTiernan employed the device again in\u00a0The Hunt for Red October<\/em> (1990). The frames surmounting this entry show the heroes suddenly being fired upon.<\/p>\n

It seems likely that many modern directors became aware of this device from seeing Lydia’s discovery of the pecked-up body of farmer Dan in The Birds<\/em> (1963). Hitchcock knew Soviet montage techniques, so maybe we have a chain of influence here. In any case, the somewhat overbearing aggressiveness of the concentration cut has often been parodied on The Simpsons<\/em>. Here\u2019s a recent example.<\/p>\n

\"Simps \"Simps<\/p>\n

\"Simps<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

By the law of the camera axis<\/strong><\/p>\n

Axial cutting can be used more pervasively, as a structuring element for an entire scene. This is what Lev Kuleshov does in a climactic moment of By the Law<\/em> (1926). Edith and her husband have kept the murderer at rifle point for days, and the strain is starting to show. She becomes hysterical, and Kuleshov uses a ragged rhythm of stasis and movement to convey it. First he cuts straight in from a master shot to a medium shot of her. I reproduce the frames from the film strip, for reasons that will become obvious.<\/p>\n

\"By<\/p>\n

Then Kuleshov cuts straight back to the master setup. Again he cuts in, but to a closer view of Edith as she becomes more frenzied.<\/p>\n

\"By<\/p>\n

Cut back once more to the long shot, but only for fourteen frames. That shot is interrupted by a shot of Edith already laughing crazily, her head tipped back.<\/p>\n

\"By<\/p>\n

The shot of her laugh lasts only five frames, and this mere glimpse, combined with the blatant mismatch of movement, makes the onset of her spell all the more startling. When we cut back to the long shot her face and position now match.<\/p>\n

\"By<\/p>\n

The abrupt quality of her outburst would not have been as striking if Kuleshov had varied his angle. As the earlier examples show, when only shot scale changes and angle remains the same, the cuts can be very harsh, and Kuleshov accentuates this quality with a flagrant mismatch.<\/p>\n

Akira Kurosawa likewise used the concentration cut to provide salient moments throughout his work; it almost became a stylistic fingerprint. At several points in Sugata Sanshiro<\/em> (1943) he uses the device in the usual popping-forward way. But he varies it during Sanshiro\u2019s combat with old Murai. He reserves dynamic, often elliptical cuts for moments of rapid action, and then he uses axial cuts for moments of stasis or highly repetitive maneuvers. In effect, the moments of peak action happen almost too quickly, while the moments of waiting are emphasized by cut-ins.<\/p>\n

So at the start of the match, a series of axial cuts, linked by dissolves, present the fighters in a slow dance.\u00a0But the ensuing throws are editing briskly. When old Murai is thrown and lies gasping on the mat, axial cuts accentuate his immobility. Kurosawa adds a rhythmic urgency on the soundtrack. After each cut-in, we hear the voice of Murai’s daughter, either offscreen or in his thoughts: \u201cFather will win.\u201d \u201cFather will win.\u201d \u201cFather will surely win.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"SS \"SS<\/p>\n

\"SS<\/p>\n

The matching of lines to the editing is at work in the Simpsons<\/em> parody too, in which the Comic Book Guy’s words are heard in tempo with the concentration cuts. “You. Are. Acceptable<\/em>.”<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Montage and the axial cut<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"SME<\/p>\n

By now it\u2019s easy for us to see that one scene from Alexander Nevsky<\/em> (1938) opens with a series of axial cuts, out and in.<\/p>\n

\"Nevsky \"Nevsky<\/p>\n

\"Nevsky \"Nevsky<\/p>\n

But why would Eisenstein, master of montage, regress to such a primitive device? He had occasionally used axial cuts in his silent films, as when we see Kerensky brooding in the Winter Palace in October<\/em> (1928).<\/p>\n

\"Oct \"Oct<\/p>\n

\"Oct<\/p>\n

And Potemkin<\/em>‘s famous cuts in to the Cossack slashing at the camera (that is, the baby, the old lady) are axial. (These cuts are pastiched by Eli Roth and Tarantino<\/a> in Inglourious Basterds<\/em>.)\u00a0At the limit, Eisenstein toyed with the axial cut by moving the figures around during the shot change. In\u00a0Potemkin,<\/em> the ship\u2019s officer reports to the captain that the crew has refused to eat. The captain leaves one shot and climbs the stair before Eisenstein cuts in to show him leaving again.\u00a0The repetition would not be so perceptible if Eisenstein had varied the angle.<\/p>\n

\"Pot \"Pot<\/p>\n

\"Pot \"Pot<\/p>\n

In the 1930s, Eisenstein began thinking about the axial cut as a basic structural element of a scene. In both his theory and practice, he promoted the axial cut to a level of prominence it hadn\u2019t seen since the days of the tableau. Usually the cuts involve static subjects, like most of Kurosawa’s, but he still exploits the cut-ins to create vivid, if spatially impossible effects. At one point our popping in closer to Ivan the Terrible is doubled by him majestically and magically popping out of his tent to meet us, like a thrusting chess piece.<\/p>\n

\"Ivan \"Ivan<\/p>\n

\"Ivan<\/p>\n

The new primacy of axial cutting comes from Eisenstein’s idea that \u201cmontage units\u201d could powerfully organize the space of a scene. He thought that you could imagine filming a scene from only a few general positions, but then varying camera setups within each of these orientations. The montage unit was a cluster of framings taken from roughly the same orientation, as in the Pskov and Ivan<\/em> scenes.<\/p>\n

The idea may derive from his study of Japanese art, shown further above, in which he explored how a single image of a cherry branch could be chopped up into a great variety of compositions. In his course at the Soviet film school, he illustrated with a hypothetical scene of the Haitian revolutionary Dessalines holding his enemies at bay at a banquet. After imagining a master shot from the farthest-back position in the montage unit, Eisenstein proposes a series of dynamic closer views.<\/p>\n

\"Nizhny<\/p>\n

Eisenstein didn\u2019t think that each scene had to be handled in a single montage unit. You could create two or three predominant orientations, with shots from each woven together. Or you could gain a sudden accent when a stream of setups from the same unit was interrupted by one from a very different angle. These ideas he put into practice throughout\u00a0Nevsky<\/em> and Ivan the Terrible<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Why? Eisenstein thought that combining shots taken from roughly the same orientation yielded a musical play between constant elements and variation. Each shot shows us something we\u2019ve seen before but also something new, the way a bass line or sustained chords can continue underneath a changing melody. Eisenstein was convinced that this flowing weave of visual elements gave the spectator a deeper involvement in the film as it unfolded\u2014an involvement akin to that found in Wagnerian opera.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The axial cut is a good example of how even a simple stylistic choice harbors rich creative possibilities. It also shows how a technique can change its impact in different filmmaking traditions. In the tableau tradition the axial cut was for the most part an abrupt enlargement heightening a moment of strong acting. In the early days of Hollywood continuity it became one editing option among many, and its power was somewhat muted. For the Soviets, concentration cuts could be multiplied and joined with fast cutting and big close-ups. The result could jolt the viewer by italicizing a face or an object–a purpose that has been taken up by contemporary Hollywood. For Kurosawa, the technique offered a way to contrast extreme movement and extreme stillness. And for Eisenstein, it suggested a global strategy for weaving visual elements into an immersive whole.<\/p>\n

The protean functions assumed by this simple device remind us of how much there is yet to discover about film style. Despite all our discoveries over the last three decades, we have only begun. The name is apt: A seminar is where things start.<\/p>\n

\n

For more on the staging strategies of the tableau style, see <\/span>On the History of Film Style<\/span><\/em> and <\/span>Figures Traced in Light: On Cinematic Staging<\/span><\/em>, as well as blog entries here<\/a> and here<\/a> and here<\/a> and here<\/a>. You can find examples of emerging Hollywood continuity techniques in this entry on 1917<\/a> and this one on William S. Hart<\/a> and this one on Doug Fairbanks<\/a><\/span>. Sugata Sanshiro<\/span><\/em> is at last available in a good DVD version from Criterion as part of its big Kurosawa box<\/a>. Eisenstein’s ideas about the axial cut are explained in Vladimir Nizhny, <\/span>Lessons with Eisenstein<\/a><\/span><\/em>, trans. and ed. Ivor Montagu and Jay Leyda (New York: Hill and Wang, 1962), Chapters II and III. In <\/span><\/span>The Cinema of Eisenstein I try to show how these ideas are employed in the Old Man’s late films.<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

\"seminar<\/span><\/p>\n

Seated: Leslie Debauche, Lea Jacobs, Rebecca Genauer, Pam Reisel, Amanda McQueen. Standing: Karin Kolb, Andrea Comiskey, Ben Brewster, John Powers, Tristan Mentz, Heather Heckman, Aaron Granat, Jenny Oyallon-Koloski, Jonah Horwitz, and Booth Wilson. Evan Davis had to leave early.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Hunt for Red October. DB here: Seminar, orig. German (1889): A class that meets for systematic study under the direction of a teacher. From Latin seminarium, \u201cseed-plot.\u201d I retired from full-time teaching in July of 2005. Since then, while writing and traveling (both chronicled on this website), I\u2019ve done occasional lectures. But this fall […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[268,90,66,112,12,14,5,58,51,57,111,68,183],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1910s-cinema","category-directors-bauer","category-directors-eisenstein","category-directors-kuleshov","category-film-history","category-film-scholarship","category-film-technique","category-technique-editing","category-film-theory","category-hollywood-aesthetic-traditions","category-national-cinemas-russia-and-ussr","category-silent-film","category-tableau-staging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6136"}],"version-history":[{"count":77,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44736,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6136\/revisions\/44736"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}