{"id":47786,"date":"2021-09-25T13:09:06","date_gmt":"2021-09-25T18:09:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=47786"},"modified":"2022-01-13T17:11:08","modified_gmt":"2022-01-13T23:11:08","slug":"70s-mixtape-hit-tom-nichols-and-the-deplorables","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2021\/09\/25\/70s-mixtape-hit-tom-nichols-and-the-deplorables\/","title":{"rendered":"70s mixtape hit: Tom Nichols and the Deplorables"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Crowd-700.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47829\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Crowd-700.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"700\" height=\"395\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Crowd-700.jpg 700w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Crowd-700-150x85.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Crowd-700-500x282.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>From studying the polls, I would guess that about a third of the American people at any given moment would welcome a fascist state.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 180px;\"><em>Gore Vidal, 1975<\/em><\/p>\n<p>DB here:<\/p>\n<p>For American conservatives, Hollywood is a prime villain, coarsening the culture and spreading liberal propaganda. Yet when Reagan promised to veto tax-increase legislation, he quoted <em>Dirty Harry<\/em>\u2019s \u201cMake my day.\u201d He also promoted a \u201cStar Wars\u201d space defense system. Now <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2018\/09\/13\/venice-2018-assorted-malefactors\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Steve Bannon<\/a> models his political ethos on <em>Twelve O\u2019Clock High<\/em>. Stephen Miller is reported to idolize the Robert de Niro character in <em>Casino<\/em>, even mimicking his dress code. When Brad Parscale wanted to scare the Democrats, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2020\/may\/07\/trump-campaign-manager-brad-parscale-death-star\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">he compared<\/a> his Trump campaign organization to the Death Star (evidently he didn\u2019t see the movie&#8217;s ending). Roger Ailes\u2019 son Zach quotes <em>Tombstone<\/em>, and Sidney Powell compared her bumbling assault on 2020 election results to an attack of the Kraken. The red pill\/blue pill choice from <em>The Matrix<\/em> is at the center of the ideology of QOnan (not a typo). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/01\/17\/technology\/qanon-meme-queen.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">A conspiracy \u201cmeme queen\u201d<\/a> had a cinematic epiphany about Pizzagate: \u201cThe world opened up in Technicolor for me. It was like the Matrix \u2014 everything just started to download.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>An academic might argue that right-wingers are practicing their own version of ad subversion, twisting the Hollywood product to their own ends, like <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/D\u00e9tournement\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a Situationist d\u00e9tournement<\/a>. But actually, most of these associations may betray the Republican fascination with violence. Pat Buchanan\u2019s command that his followers \u201cLock and load\u201d and Sarah Palin\u2019s evocation of \u201cSecond Amendment solutions\u201d would plausibly lead to a mindset that results in zealous young Republicans in 2007 calling themselves \u201cThe Young Guns,\u201d after a now-forgotten western. A famous line in <em>The Town<\/em>\u00a0(2010) about going out to hurt some people <a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/politics\/la-xpm-2011-jul-27-la-pn-democrats-the-town-20110727-story.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">found an eager GOP takeup<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>One would think that the more conspiracy-minded right would fetishize the long-running cycle of Deep-State political thrillers like <em>JFK<\/em> (1991), <em>Clear and Present Danger<\/em> (1994), <em>Air Force One<\/em> (1997) and <em>Enemy of the State<\/em>(1998), up to <em>Equalizer 2<\/em> (2018). Such films center on rogue cadres within the government aiming to undermine official policy by working with ambitious office-holders, zealous bureaucrats, free-lance killers, and terrorists or drug smugglers. This \u201cparanoid political thriller\u201d is one legacy of a cascade of US assassinations in the sixties, resulting in classics like <em>Seven Days in May<\/em> (1964) and <em>The Parallax View<\/em> (1974).<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps these too are Golden Oldies for Y&#8217;all Queda. But one of the most ingenious appropriations I\u2019ve encountered comes from a less fringe figure. <em>3 Days of the Condor<\/em> (1975), another in the Deep State cycle, is invoked in an unusual way in a new book by Tom Nichols. Like other conservatives, he finds that it illuminates contemporary politics, but not because of its revelation of off-the-books intrigue.<\/p>\n<p>When the hero-on-the-run Robert Redford says he&#8217;s revealed the conspiracy to the press, Cliff Robertson as the CIA man isn&#8217;t worried. <em>The Times<\/em> may not print the story, but even if it does, the public won\u2019t care. When the next crisis comes, the people will ask only not to be discomfited. They will expect their government to solve problems they have happily ignored for years.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"kaltura_player\" title=\"Kaltura Player\" src=\"https:\/\/cdnapisec.kaltura.com\/p\/1660902\/sp\/166090200\/embedIframeJs\/uiconf_id\/25717641\/partner_id\/1660902?iframeembed=true&amp;playerId=kaltura_player&amp;entry_id=1_51o252l2&amp;flashvars[streamerType]=auto&amp;flashvars[localizationCode]=en_US&amp;flashvars[leadWithHTML5]=true&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.position]=left&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.clickToClose]=true&amp;flashvars[chapters.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[chapters.layout]=vertical&amp;flashvars[chapters.thumbnailRotator]=false&amp;flashvars[streamSelector.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[EmbedPlayer.SpinnerTarget]=videoHolder&amp;flashvars[dualScreen.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[Kaltura.addCrossoriginToIframe]=true&amp;&amp;wid=1_6cimw1ms\" width=\"649\" height=\"401\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><br \/>\nFor Nichols, this is a parable of the decline of American civic virtue. Democracy could end because \u201cuninformed, spoiled, irascible voters simply can\u2019t produce coherent demands other than \u2018just get it for us.\u2019\u201d Technocratic elites will oblige in ways that concentrate their power because \u201cbored and dissipated citizens\u201d see the only threats as ones to their living standards.<\/p>\n<p>How did the populace become so infantilized? <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Our-Own-Worst-Enemy-Democracy\/dp\/0197518877\/ref=sr_1_2?crid=13CXXJXJ5C4M7&amp;dchild=1&amp;keywords=our+own+worst+enemy+tom+nichols&amp;qid=1632175458&amp;s=books&amp;sprefix=our+own%2Cstripbooks%2C195&amp;sr=1-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Our Own Worst Enemy<\/em><\/a> seeks an explanation\u2014one that I find as provocative as it is incomplete. Here&#8217;s my take. Yes, films (with <strong>spoilers<\/strong>) are involved.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The hippest conservative?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-food-600.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47842\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-food-600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-food-600.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-food-600-150x113.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-food-600-400x300.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Tom Nichols, 10 June 2021, Sona restaurant, New York City.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>For some time, the conservative movement has been in search of a leading public intellectual. William F. Buckley loomed so large for many decades that few late arrivals have matched him, or even George Will. Current contenders include William Kristol, David Frum, David Brooks, and Ross Douthat, but Tom Nichols may turn to be the most widely influential.<\/p>\n<p>He\u2019s a late arrival. Kristol has been on the scene for decades. Brooks and Frum are Nichols\u2019 contemporaries (all born 1960-1961), but they\u2019ve had far more exposure, not least in several books of sweeping political commentary: five from Brooks, nine from Frum. Douthat is nearly twenty years younger than these, but he has already published six books, most claiming some attention. Brooks and Douthat have a powerful platform, the Opinion wing of the <em>New York Times<\/em>, while Frum, a formidable intellectual, is a senior editor at the newly energized <em>Atlantic<\/em>. Frum as well has extensive White House experience, notably as a speechwriter for George W. Bush.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, Nichols has been a scholar specializing in Cold War geopolitics and international relations. He teaches at the U. S. Naval War College and at Harvard Extension School. Fluent in Russian, he has written monographs on military policy with a focus on Soviet and post-Soviet history and nuclear deterrence.<\/p>\n<p>Graduating from high school in 1975, Nichols became a late-stage Cold Warrior. He enthusiastically voted for Reagan twice. He worked for Republican Senator John Heinz, on the recommendation of Jeane Kirkpatrick. He opposed Trump in 2016, but\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2016\/07\/05\/george-will-may-be-leaving-the-gop-but-im-rejoining-it\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">he stayed in the party<\/a> hoping to break the fever. (Excellent invocation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2019\/12\/17\/not-just-a-christmas-movie-die-hard-on-the-big-screen\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Die Hard<\/em><\/a> in his declaration.) He <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2018\/10\/tom-nichols-why-im-leaving-republican-party\/572419\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">broke permanently with the GOP<\/a>\u00a0in 2018 when Susan Collins endorsed Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court. He has become another political commentator, writing for <em>USA Today<\/em> and <em>The Atlantic.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In his new anti-GOP phase, Nichols&#8217; expertise has enabled him to be more prescient than his counterparts. In two 2017 pieces he pointed out problems with the chain of command devoted to launching nuclear weapons, anticipating the crisis concerning Trump and General Mark Milley. In 2020, a week before January 6, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2020\/12\/trump-could-still-start-last-ditch-war-iran\/617530\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">he warned<\/a> that Trump was considering war with Iran after losing the election.<\/p>\n<p>On other fronts, his prophetic powers failed him.\u00a0In 2016, Nichols was <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2016\/02\/24\/ill-take-hillary-clinton-over-donald-trump\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">in despair<\/a> at the Clinton\/Trump option; he despised Clinton, a tenable view, but worried about Trump more. His prophetic powers&#8211;always at risk among hot-take pundits&#8211;were less than accurate, though. If Trump were to win in 2016, Nichols predicted:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>His white nationalist supporters, clinging to him like lice in the fur of an angry chimp, will shake their fists along with him for a time, until they too eventually slink away. By 2020, his core constituency will be a tiny sliver of what\u2019s left of the white working class, pathetically standing at the gates of empty factories they thought Trump would re-open.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>Conservatives can recover from four, or even eight, years of Hillary Clinton. We might even flourish. . . . [But Trump] will obliterate Republicans further down the ticket in 2016 and 2020, smear conservatism as nothing more than his own brand of narcissism, and destroy decades of hard work, including Ronald Reagan\u2019s legacy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Oops. Still, he did get this part right:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>After four years of thrashing around in the Oval Office like the ignorant boor he is, voters will no longer be able distinguish between the words \u201cTrump,\u201d \u201cRepublican,\u201d \u201cconservative,\u201d and \u201cbuffoon.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As you can see, Nichols is a zesty writer, more casually hip than the solemn Frum, the bland Brooks, the grinning and shrugging Kristol, and the piously calm Douthat. Douthat has written film reviews for <em>National Review<\/em>, but Nichols plunges into popular culture with more zest. He\u2019s a five-time <em>Jeopardy <\/em>champion, and he loves <em>Star Trek<\/em> and the band Boston (but is pretty hard on most 70s TV and music).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-Carla-300.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47843 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-Carla-300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"314\" height=\"407\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-Carla-300.jpg 314w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-Carla-300-116x150.jpg 116w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tom-and-Carla-300-231x300.jpg 231w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px\" \/><\/a>He also understands the churn of Net life. His early blogs attracted international attention, so with a publisher\u2019s encouragement he developed their ideas into a book, <em>The Death of Expertise<\/em> (2017). For <em>Our Own Worst Enemy<\/em>, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RadioFreeTom\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">his &#8220;Radio Free Tom&#8221; Twitter feed<\/a> playfully carries out social-media branding. While David Frum provides purchasers of his book dignified bookplates, Nichols offers bookplates with the pawprint of his beloved cat Carla, along with a T-shirt, <a href=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/playlist\/4SHXhpjSnFHZ9vXsWB2MCt?si=9cddd6286de64400&amp;nd=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a playlist<\/a> of all the songs mentioned in the text, and a contest to find a factual mistake (about a movie, no less) that he spotted too late. He has encouraged readers to send photos of their pets cuddling with the book (#PetsDefendingDemocracy).<\/p>\n<p>Beyond the PR, his Twitter feed emits a stream of commentary, wisecracks, retweets, and replies to insults. Most Saturday mornings Nichols and two compadres live-tweet their reactions to reruns of Casey Kasem\u2019s 1970s top-forty countdowns. Most famously, he sparked <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eater.com\/2019\/11\/26\/20984048\/indian-food-is-terrible-is-a-bad-twitter-opinion-usa-today-op-ed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a controversy<\/a> in 2019 when he declared on Twitter, \u201cIndian food is bad and we pretend it isn\u2019t.\u201d The online battle raged until June 2021, when Preet Bhahrara took him to a New York restaurant and Nichols was won to the joys of biriyani. In the process, the stunt raised <a href=\"https:\/\/americankahani.com\/lead-stories\/preet-bharara-raises-over-120000-for-india-covid-relief-while-winning-over-an-indian-food-hater\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">over $120,000 for Indian COVID relief<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols is a passionate, ironic presence on podcasts and talk shows, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.c-span.org\/video\/?426290-1\/tom-nichols-discusses-the-death-expertise#\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">his rapid-fire sense of humor, <\/a>fueled by self-deprecating anecdotes and boyhood memories, sets him apart from his more sober counterparts. In 2008, Frum famously <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffpost.com\/entry\/david-frum-on-rachel-madd_b_134432\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">complained<\/a> about the \u201clevity and sarcasm\u201d on Rachel Maddow\u2019s show, but Nichols knows the new rules \u00a0and he deploys gags, mockery, and bad language with cheerful abandon. As I was writing this, he was sitting with Nicolle Wallace, another renegade Republican, saying that Trump wouldn\u2019t know the Insurrection Act from a Macdonald\u2019s menu. In the pages of the august <em>Atlantic<\/em>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2021\/07\/moral-collapse-jd-vance\/619428\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">he declared J. D. Vance an \u201casshole\u201d<\/a> (\u201cnothing else will do\u201d), an invective-escalation that leaves his more constrained <em>Times <\/em>rivals in the dust. Yet he\u2019s not always frivolous. A Greek Orthodox Christian, he struggles with his growing indifference to the Covid deniers who wind up on ventilators.<\/p>\n<p>All in all, a very interesting person. Nichols\u2019 Twitter stream has half a million followers, more than Brooks\u2019 and Douthat\u2019s put together. Publishers dream of writers who get this degree of fan engagement. He has won <a href=\"https:\/\/podcasts.google.com\/feed\/aHR0cHM6Ly9wb2RjYXN0LnRoZWJ1bHdhcmsuY29tL3Jzcw\/episode\/MGVmNmEwZjItNWM4NC00NzFlLWIzYWEtODBmNDExNDEyZDVh?hl=en&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjKjKPao_fyAhXF6Z4KHSTIDQIQjrkEegQIAhAF&amp;ep=6\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the allegiance<\/a> of the major anti-Trump online magazine <em>The Bulwark<\/em>, run by Wisconsin&#8217;s former Rush Limbaugh Charlie Syes. Nichols has announced his retirement from the Academy this year, which will surely allow him more energy for punditry.<\/p>\n<p>Curiously Frum, Douthat, and Nichols run in parallel lanes, seldom mentioning one another, let alone debating or making common cause. They compete to offer differing maps of the American hellscape blasted by Trump and Trumpism. I\u2019m not capable of making in-depth comparisons among them, but I do want to focus on Nichols\u2019 claims.<\/p>\n<p>I think that by\u00a0pitching its analysis at the level of the sensibility of a group, Nichols&#8217; book misses some particular forces that have tapped into that sensibility. Those are forces that are historical and as we say now, systemic. These forces not only complicate his historical account but reveal some basic flaws in Republicanism and conservatism more generally.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>A hotbed of apathy<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/boat-600.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47816\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/boat-600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/boat-600.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/boat-600-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/boat-600-450x300.jpg 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px;\"><strong>As the polity becomes more and more conscious of the nullity at the center of American life, there will develop not the revolutionary situation dreamed of in certain radical circles, but, rather, a deep contempt for the nation and its institutions, an apathy bound to be exploited by clever human engineers.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 180px;\"><em>Gore Vidal, 1972<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Nichols\u2019 core claim in the book is that contemporary American society is best characterized as one that has abandoned civility and respect in favor of selfishness and entitlement. We are, to use his frequent terms, no longer an adult or a \u201cserious\u201d people.<\/p>\n<p>But who is <em>we<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Cover-2-300.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47812 alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Cover-2-300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"314\" height=\"455\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Cover-2-300.jpg 314w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Cover-2-300-104x150.jpg 104w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Cover-2-300-207x300.jpg 207w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px\" \/><\/a>In interviews he sometimes says he means all of us. But that can\u2019t be right. Thoughtful adults like Nichols, his readers, me, and probably you aren\u2019t the people he criticizes. Nor are the \u201cthe most disadvantaged members of society.\u201d They seldom vote, struggle from day to day, don\u2019t show up at Trump rallies, and don\u2019t own pleasure boats. In 2019 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/library\/publications\/2020\/demo\/p60-270.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">they counted<\/a> as over 33 million people.<\/p>\n<p>Evidently \u201cwe\u201d are not the ultra rich, either\u2014a class fraction to which Nichols makes little reference, despite their outsize role in shaping politics. The \u201cwe\u201d of Nichols\u2019 book is a <em>they<\/em>, a group he calls in an echo of Marx the <em>lumpen-bourgeoisie<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Members of that fraction typified the mob that invaded the Capitol. A lot of the riot&#8217;s footage seems to feature classic good ol\u2019 boys, but Nichols doesn\u2019t see them as typical. Forty percent of those arrested, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2021\/02\/the-capitol-rioters-arent-like-other-extremists\/617895\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a University of Chicago study claims,<\/a> were white-collar workers or business owners. Several of those indicted are current or former police officers or members of the military. Nichols invokes vivid instances: rioters chartering jets to Washington, potbellied men trying to swagger under expensive military gear, a realtor who used the insurrection as a marketing tool. So we have to wrap our heads around the prospect that people shopping for granite countertops keep Confederate flags in the guest room. Perhaps all may belong to the group that Nichols\u2019 tweets identify as <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/RadioFreeTom\/status\/1434551337564377099\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cRube Nation.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In any case, he concentrates on this segment of Trump support, the lower-to-upper middle-class householder enjoying a second home, nautical craft, Disney World vacations, and a truculent attitude. With this vivid prototype, he aims to show how \u201ca sated middle class\u201d became the lumpen-bougeoisie.<\/p>\n<p>Its behavior springs not from material conditions of plutocracy or macro-policies, nor from the members&#8217; social prejudices. Most studies show the strongest correlation with Trump support is not class or education but racial animus, an inference supported by the Chicago study, but Nichols&#8217; book gives racial bias only a couple of pages of attention. He attributes the problem to deeper attitudes born of material plenty. He provides some statistical information, choice quotes from experts and pundits, personal anecdotes, and audiovisual aids drawn from pop culture.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Feet-300.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47811 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Feet-300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"314\" height=\"376\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Feet-300.jpg 314w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Feet-300-125x150.jpg 125w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Feet-300-251x300.jpg 251w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px\" \/><\/a>The l-b had so much affluence after the wild 1970s that they succumbed to bad habits. Their standard of living, vastly above that of other nations, pampered them into narcissism. Reviving\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Culture-Narcissism-American-Diminishing-Expectations\/dp\/0393307387\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Christopher Lasch\u2019s 1979 diagnosis,<\/a>\u00a0Nichols says that \u201ctempts us away from thinking about the needs of other people and to see them only as objects in relation to our own happiness.\u201d As selfish as spoiled toddlers, and as pain-averse as Princess Buttercup in <em>The Princess Bride<\/em>, the l-b see that everything is available on demand, and yet they want more. They simply do whatever they can get away with. They are discourteous and entitled. Now people take off their shoes on plane flights, an outrage Nichols aired in 2019 and that provides a vivid example of what\u2019s wrong with us\/them.<\/p>\n<p>Now, though, the l-b\u2019s self-centeredness has become a national threat. Americans have sunk into \u201cperpetual adolescence.\u201d To our overseas friends, this has been evident for a long time; the French call us\u00a0<em>les grands enfants<\/em>, the big kids. For Nichols this infantilism is revealed partly through Americans\u2019 fascination with show-business celebrities and empty political stars like Bill Clinton and, eventually, Donald Trump. The inevitable movie example is <em>A Face in the Crowd.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Anger-500.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47813\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Anger-500.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"274\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Anger-500.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Anger-500-150x82.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>When the l-b are thwarted in their self-indulgence, they get mad. For Nichols, anger joins narcissism as a symptom of the new sensibility. True, Nichols grants that we\u2019re largely happy (especially \u201cwealthy, married Republicans\u201d) but narcissism has made us distrustful of others. Americans poll as angrier than their international counterparts, which again seems inane, given US wealth and power. Yet Democrats are unreasonably angry about Republicans, and Republicans about Democrats, thereby \u201cescalating political differences to existential struggles.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Anger shades off into a third syndrome of Nichols\u2019 account: <em>ressentiment<\/em>. He defines this well-worn political concept as \u201can anti-democratic desire to see [others] torn down in the name of \u2018equality.\u2019\u201d It\u2019s that grudging envy, again stemming from overstuffed narcissism, that says you deserve what others have, and they don\u2019t. While Nichols claims <em>ressentiment <\/em>afflicts the left, his examples lean rightward. Trevor from Tennessee would rather die than support Obamacare; the Tea Partyers favored retaining the safety net for themselves but resent \u201chandouts\u201d to \u201cundeserving\u201d citizens. Nichols even makes common cause with <a href=\"https:\/\/tcfrank.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Thomas Frank<\/a>, outstanding leftist historian, whose <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/1250020352?tag=macmillan-20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">account of &#8220;Richistan&#8221;\u00a0<\/a>chronicles the persistent fury of prosperous people driven by the spectacle of others who have still more. The l-b got what they wanted, and seeing that others have more has made them miserable.<\/p>\n<p>Nostalgia is the fourth failing Nichols picks out. The l-b yearn to return to the past. He invokes popular culture to show how people gauze over earlier times (<em>Happy Days, That 70s Show<\/em>). Yet the same culture gives expression to rage, as in <em>All in the Family<\/em>, \u201ca constant argument . . . about who was to blame for everything being terrible.\u201d Today\u2019s l-b, declaring they want their country back, are ignoring the real problems of the present in favoring a return to\u2026what? The malaise and oil shock of the 1970s? The <em>Mad Men<\/em> conformity of the 1960s (but what about all those social conflicts)? Nichols doesn\u2019t get specific, largely confining himself to an interpretation of a <em>Night Gallery<\/em> episode. By the end of his summation he concludes that not just the l-b but \u201can entire population\u201d entertains \u201ccomforting lies about the past.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All these frailties are cranked up by the screech of the internet, a site of hyper-connectivity. The speed of online life swamps our ability to reflect on matters in a disciplined way. It exaggerates fear and yet encourages us to seek out the drama and danger of catastrophe. It allows people to share isolated anecdotes that can seem to add up to a trend. Nichols shrewdly points out that the illusory intimacy fostered by Facebook, Twitter, and other platforms has actually fostered conflict\u2014Freud\u2019s \u201cnarcissism of small differences.\u201d Quarrels get clicks, so people are encouraged to fight.<\/p>\n<p>Our online access to other lifestyles builds the l-b\u2019s anger and <em>ressentiment<\/em>. Sunny vacation tweets and virtual house tours show them how people everywhere are richer and happier than we are. To the nationalization of minor local elections there corresponds a nationalization of social activity. Everyone knows about hip-hop, the Kardashians, <em>Friends<\/em>, and school-board disputes in Chillicothe. Instead of local subcultures, \u201cthere is now one culture, mediated through the internet and cable television, and we\u2019re all living in it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Even if we were to slow our pace of consumption, the damage has been done. People are already more isolated, depressed, and angry. The architects of social media have trained us too well in self-regard and exhibitionism. Here \u201cwe\u201d actually becomes we: Nichols \u201cmust admit to my own hypocrisy.\u201d He knows that his career as media pundit, and the success of this book, owe a great deal to the virus of digital culture.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decades of decadence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Pogo-600.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47844\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Pogo-600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Pogo-600.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Pogo-600-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Pogo-600-450x300.jpg 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Every day we get evidence of Nichols&#8217; case about the Trumpistas&#8217; lunatic self-absorption. The Woodward\/ Costa blockbuster, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Peril-Bob-Woodward\/dp\/1982182911\/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=peril&amp;qid=1632591121&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Peril<\/a>,<\/em> reports the chatter a Congressman overheard on a Stop the Steal flight out of DC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px;\"><strong>America was so bad, so lost, one young man said, &#8220;I&#8217;m just going to move to South Korea.&#8221; . . .<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px;\"><strong>&#8220;You should move to Idaho,&#8221; suggested one woman.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px;\"><strong>&#8220;I just don&#8217;t think they have decent seafood in Idaho,&#8221; the young man replied.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Still, one objection to Nichols&#8217; social diagnosis pops up immediately. The liberal wing of the population has grown up with the same sense of entitlement as the l-b. The cosmopolitan upper-middle-class is in thrall to narcissism, <em>ressentiment<\/em> (status seeking, conspicuous consumption), social-media frenzy, and of course anger at the goobers.<\/p>\n<p>But metrosexuals aren&#8217;t storming the Capitol armed with bear spray and plotting to kidnap governors, let alone shooting unarmed citizens. Although conservatives claim that the libs are closet Socialists, the evidence is scanty; Bill Gates is no Kerensky, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theonion.com\/bill-gates-to-get-half-1819563950\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">possibly because half of everything is already his<\/a>. What is the secret sauce that turns the lumpen-bourgeoisie into a raging army? Nichols doesn&#8217;t engage with the most obvious explanations: superstition (e.g., Evangelicalism), gun fetishism, racial prejudice, proud ignorance (Trump: &#8220;I love the poorly educated&#8221;), <a href=\"https:\/\/thehealthcareblog.com\/blog\/2017\/01\/04\/americas-health-and-the-2016-election-an-unexpected-connection\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">bad health<\/a>, and, well, drugs.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, Nichols paints a landscape of social behavior that I think we can call decadent. This has long been a conservative theme, as Corey Robin points out in <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Reactionary-Mind-Conservatism-Edmund-Donald\/dp\/0190692006\/ref=sr_1_1?crid=DZ0IE89FIT7Y&amp;dchild=1&amp;keywords=corey+robin+reactionary+mind&amp;qid=1632176337&amp;s=books&amp;sprefix=cory+robin+%2Cstripbooks%2C187&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Reactionary Mind: Conservativism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump<\/em><\/a>. Burke and Joseph Maistre found the eighteenth-century nobility weakened by their self-absorption, while Edmond Sorel denounced the bourgeoisie as similarly unable to see how rising tides of revolution threatened their rule.<\/p>\n<p>More recently, in the US, many conservatives saw the war on terror as shaking off Clintonian complacency and taking muscular steps to reestablish American dominance. Donald and Frederick Kagan, in <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/While-America-Sleeps-Self-Delusion-Military\/dp\/0312283741\/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=kagan+while+america+slept&amp;qid=1632177543&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>While America Sleeps<\/em><\/a> (2000) lamented the \u201clack of imagination\u201d that keeps the American bourgeoisie locked in pleasurable security without the need to define itself \u201cby virtue of whom we were up against.\u201d From this perspective, war abroad and cultural strife at home would seem redemptive.<\/p>\n<p>Ross Douthat sounds the theme in a book called, no kidding, <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Decadent-Society-Became-Victims-Success\/dp\/1476785244\/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&amp;keywords=douthat+decadent&amp;qid=1632177612&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The<\/em> <em>Decadent Society<\/em> <\/a>(2020). Adapting Jacques Barzun\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Dawn-Decadence-Present-Western-Cultural\/dp\/0060928832\/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">use of the term<\/a>, Douthat finds that a decadent society enjoys a high level of prosperity and technological development but suffers from \u201ceconomic stagnation, institutional decay, and intellectual exhaustion.\u201d American life is so flat, hollow, and mired in repetition of ideas, cultural flotsam, and social rituals that no really new force can emerge. (For Douthat, that would partly entail a religious awakening.) Along with the creature comforts Nichols complains of, Douthat sees Americans as having lost faith in the expansionary impulse that opened the frontier and sent men to the moon. He apologizes for defending imperialism, but at least the conquest of other peoples provided \u201cconsolation\u201d for Europeans&#8217; waning religious faith.<\/p>\n<p>Needless to say, film is involved. In several pages Douthat finds numbing cultural repetition most evident in Hollywood, which relies on earlier films and legacy intellectual properties. (When did it not?) And yes, <em>Star Wars<\/em> makes its inevitable appearance. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2014\/08\/24\/zip-zero-zeitgeist\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Zeitgeists too.<\/a> As usual, the 70s were better, when those daring nonconformist movies grappled with reality. I try to type this with a straight face.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols makes no reference to Douthat or his book, but he might have acknowledged that his own worry about American torpor is a diagnosis that conservatives often have to hand. Nichols&#8217; sense of decadence emphasizes loss of civic responsibility, while Douthat is more wide-ranging; but both see our problems as born of a population unable to shake off comfort and become engaged in moving history forward.<\/p>\n<p>We often envision conservative thought as clinging to a status quo, but Robin points out that conservatives are literally reactionary. They define their program by reacting to any threats to social hierarchy, whether that is a revolutionary surge from below or simply a barren landscape of peace and plenty that leaves the populace apathetic and vulnerable to enemies, inside or out.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hard to be a grown-up<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Clare-cartoon-600.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47826\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Clare-cartoon-600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"488\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Clare-cartoon-600.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Clare-cartoon-600-150x122.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Clare-cartoon-600-369x300.jpg 369w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>William Gropper, caricature of Rep. Clare Hoffman (R-Michigan)(1942).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Nichols asks virtuous citizens to be \u201cmature\u201d and \u201cadult\u201d and &#8220;serious.&#8221; We deliberate questions, we trust experts, we avoid conspiracy theories and reckless accusations. Yet this raises the question of whether the political party he has supported for forty years measures up. You can go back to any point in Republican history, but just let me recall the 1940s version of America First and how members of that party responded to it. There are some striking anticipations of today\u2019s rhetoric.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>Hamilton Fish (R-New York) 1940:<\/strong> \u201cWe don\u2019t want any alien philosophies in this country. This is a Christian American nation. . . America for the Americans\u2014that should be the cry of the America First Committee.\u201d When he referred to \u201cinternational bankers\u201d dragging the US into war, the crowd cried, \u201cThe Jews. The Jews.\u201d Fish smiled approvingly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>Clare A. Hoffman (R-Michigan) 1940:<\/strong> \u201cHis [Roosevelt\u2019s] threat to use the sovereignty of a Government is but the threat of a Hitler, a Mussolini, a Stalin to silence all opposition and criticism.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>George Bender (R-Ohio) 1940:<\/strong> \u201cOur people hate everything Hitler stands for, we despise dictatorship in any form, but I challenge anyone to tell us the difference between the Executive Orders issued by Roosevelt and those issued by Hitler.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>Clare A. Hoffman (R-Michigan) 1942:<\/strong> \u201cPerhaps nothing but a march on Washington will ever restore this Government to the people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>These are the serious people Republicans elected to Congress in the good old days when we were just emerging from the Depression and had to fight a world war. Has the party changed?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2018\/10\/tom-nichols-why-im-leaving-republican-party\/572419\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">According to Nichols<\/a>, the scales fell from his eyes in 2016, when Trump won the nomination.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>I spent nearly 40 years as a Republican, a relationship that began when I joined a revitalized GOP that saw itself not as a victim but as the vehicle for lifting America out of the wreckage of the 1970s, defeating the Soviet Union, and extending human freedom at home and abroad. I stayed during the turbulence of the Tea Party tomfoolery. I moved out briefly during the abusive 2012 primaries. But now I\u2019m filing for divorce, and I am taking nothing with me when I go.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Yet Nichols\u2019 former party has long failed to exhibit the virtues he exalts.\u00a0During his adherence to the party, the notably unserious Dan Quayle and Sarah Palin were nominated to be a breath away from the presidency. Joe the (not) Plumber was a campaign gimmick. Bush\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Rise-Vulcans-History-Bushs-Cabinet\/dp\/0143034898\/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=the+rise+of+the+vulcans&amp;qid=1632224780&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Vulcans<\/a> Cheney (\u201cReagan proved deficits don\u2019t matter\u201d), Rice, Rumsfeld, Armitage, and Wolfowitz lied the country into two wars, built a mercenary invasive force, and ignored the 9-11 terrorists\u2019 ties to Saudi Arabia.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols was there for the rise of Birtherism in the party, along with the sideshow of backwoods GOP time-servers circulating cartoons of the First Family as sharecroppers and cannibals. He apparently missed the capture of the Party, over George H. W. Bush&#8217;s objections (safely in retirement), by the National Rife Association starting in 1995. Nichols says he was <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/radiofreetom\/status\/1081420811683225602\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&#8220;hating on&#8221;<\/a> the Tea Party from the start, but it didn&#8217;t nudge him to break. Well before Trump\u2019s nomination, Nichols witnessed Mitch McConnell\u2019s refusal to set nominations for Merrick Garland, which could be a deal-breaker if you think mature adults play in good faith. Today\u2019s canny reinforcement of public distrust was already on display in McConnell\u2019s reply when asked if Obama was a Muslim: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffpost.com\/entry\/mcconnell-obama-christian_n_690412\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cI take him at his word.\u201d <\/a>On Twitter Nichols deplores our GOP equivocators who dance around questions of vaccination and the legitimacy of Biden\u2019s election. But these hacks are reactivating dodges on display for decades. Dog whistles were never pitched <em>all <\/em>that high.<\/p>\n<p>As a Boomer, I can match Nichols with a couple of personal anecdotes. In rural New York, I saw often enough the racism that emerges if just one or two Black families move into a community. Classroom: Teacher describes Brazil nuts as \u201cn-gg-r toes.\u201d Schoolyard: Kids surround the only Black student and shout the word at her.<\/p>\n<p>Later, in those narcissistic days of the 70\u2019s, I thought that people lining up for gas during the Oil Shock would later have sufficient memories to be prudent about energy. But when the shortage subsided, people went on to buy gas-guzzling vans and SUVs. A big chunk of the electorate was already pretty infantilized. Thirty years later, at the depths of the 2008 recession (blamed by Nichols on people\u2019s imprudent longing for home ownership), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2008\/12\/18\/bush-and-public-opinion\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a solid 24% approved Bush\u2019s handling of the economy<\/a>. The obtuse are a persistent voting bloc.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols is fond of quoting JFK\u2019s \u201cAsk not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country\u201d as a clarion call for virtuous citizenship. Yet it was Ronald Reagan who turned that on its head in October 1980: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.debates.org\/voter-education\/debate-transcripts\/october-28-1980-debate-transcript\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cAre you better off than you were four years ago?\u201d<\/a> True, Reagan went on to worry about unemployment figures and national defense, but pitching the problems as concerning one\u2019s personal comfort looks a lot like \u201ctempting us away from thinking about the needs of other people and to see them only as objects in relation to our own happiness.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Further, Reagan tapped into nostalgia (\u201ca shining city on a hill\u201d) and <em>ressentiment<\/em> (the \u201cwelfare queen,\u201d the unworthy Black man buying steaks with \u201cour\u201d tax money). For the anger ingredient, he would subcontract that to wingmen like Oliver North. For years his team <a href=\"https:\/\/www.history.com\/news\/aids-epidemic-ronald-reagan\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">laughed off<\/a> the AIDS epidemic. Apart from all that, Reagan didn\u2019t offer us the option of deliberating, as thoughtful citizens, whether \u201cwe\u201d should sell weaponry to Iran and divert the money to an undeclared war in Nicaragua.<\/p>\n<p>More on-the-spot evidence emerges from the sorrowful memoir by Stuart Stevens, long-time successful GOP political consultant. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Was-All-Lie-Republican-Became\/dp\/0593080971\/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=it+was+all+a+lie&amp;qid=1632429692&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald Trump<\/em><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Stevens-cover.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47848 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Stevens-cover.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"314\" height=\"462\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Stevens-cover.jpg 314w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Stevens-cover-102x150.jpg 102w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Stevens-cover-204x300.jpg 204w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px\" \/><\/a> (2020) traces in detail how after World War II, and especially after the Civil Rights movement, the party became firmly allied with white supremacy. Unlike Nichols, Samuels puts race prejudice at the center of his argument, making it the very basis of the 1970s Republican resurgence. Well before the rise of Trump, the thought leaders of the right were not legislators but Rush Limbaugh and other talk-radio blowhards, along with Newt Gingrich. In his 2021 preface Stevens admits that even he didn&#8217;t anticipate Trump&#8217;s efforts to overturn the election, let alone the Stop the Steal rally.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>I could not conceive of the Republican Party becoming the greatest internal threat to democracy since the Civil War. But that is the reality of this moment.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>He spares some thoughts for the millions who have bought into Trumpism, but I think that he sets the balance more justly than Nichols does. A long con allows us to blame the victims for their gullibility, especially if they continue to be milked for years. But ultimately we blame the grifter, not the chumps.<\/p>\n<p>Of course many Democrats have been bigoted, corrupt, and mendacious. There were Dixiecrats and brutal Democratic political machines ruling cities.\u00a0(One reason not to join either party and instead support select candidates.) But it\u2019s fair to bring up GOP names, then and now, because Nichols relies on a personality-centered conception of mature human agency: temperament as projected publicly, as opposed to socially mediated action.<\/p>\n<p>I was struck by a central anecdote. His father, a staunch Republican, declared that the country would be \u201cjust fine\u201d whether Romney or Obama won in 2012. \u201cThey\u2019re both good men.\u201d Putting aside the charge that Nichols here indulges in nostalgia, is that really a mature, adult judgment?<\/p>\n<p>Mitt Romney is a financial speculator, famed for asset-stripping distressed companies into bankruptcy and wiping out jobs. (He was attacked as such by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/fact-checker\/post\/four-pinocchios-for-king-of-bain\/2012\/01\/12\/gIQADX8WuP_blog.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">none other than Gingrich<\/a>.) He ran for office on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/documents\/2012-republican-party-platform\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a Republican platform<\/a> that vowed to cut corporate tax rates, reduce Medicare, privatize Amtrak and other intercity rail systems, block union organizing, and initiate a Constitutional amendment to limit federal spending. The platform also maintained that states had the right to forbid same-sex marriages. Romney\u2019s purported principles would not leave everyone \u201cjust fine.\u201d And even though <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2020\/06\/07\/politics\/mitt-romney-black-lives-matter-protest\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">he once joined a George Floyd protest march<\/a>, he&#8217;s given no sign of opposing the voter-suppression measures now under consideration in dozens of states.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s much to be said against Romney\u2019s presidential rival Obama as well, but surely Nichols would declare that the crucial factor in judging either man\u2019s candidacy is not whether you think well of the guy. He praises his dad for equanimity, but by his own standards, that isn\u2019t enough for informed citizenship. Mature judgment requires understanding of substance, process, and context&#8211;and taking action.<\/p>\n<p>A movie memory of mine matches\u00a0<em>3 Days of the Condor<\/em>. I grew up fed on the films <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2010\/09\/09\/take-it-from-a-boomer-tv-will-break-your-heart\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">and TV shows<\/a> providing social commentary from a more or less Democratic angle. I was also tempted by stronger appeals; in high school I subscribed to the newspapers of the Socialist Workers\u2019 Party and the Socialist Labor Party, as well as <em>The New Republic<\/em>. Later I would recognize Preminger\u2019s <em>Advise and Consent<\/em> (1962) as the best movie about Washington politics (i.e., gridlock).<\/p>\n<p>Rediscovering <em>The Best Man<\/em> (1964) lately, I think Cliff Robertson\u2019s sound-bite speech to a Convention gaggle might have reinforced my teenage skepticism about the GOP. Robertson is a right-wing Democrat trying to wrest the nomination from Henry Fonda, an Adlai-Stevenson-style intellectual.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"kaltura_player\" title=\"Kaltura Player\" src=\"https:\/\/cdnapisec.kaltura.com\/p\/1660902\/sp\/166090200\/embedIframeJs\/uiconf_id\/25717641\/partner_id\/1660902?iframeembed=true&amp;playerId=kaltura_player&amp;entry_id=1_2fdg9x7c&amp;flashvars[streamerType]=auto&amp;flashvars[localizationCode]=en_US&amp;flashvars[leadWithHTML5]=true&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.position]=left&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.clickToClose]=true&amp;flashvars[chapters.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[chapters.layout]=vertical&amp;flashvars[chapters.thumbnailRotator]=false&amp;flashvars[streamSelector.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[EmbedPlayer.SpinnerTarget]=videoHolder&amp;flashvars[dualScreen.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[Kaltura.addCrossoriginToIframe]=true&amp;&amp;wid=1_jg5zzdrn\" width=\"649\" height=\"401\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Despite his noble principles, Robertson is prepared to play very dirty. At this moment, he is threatening Fonda with circulating confidential documents about treatment for a mild breakdown. That is still the GOP strategy. The bafflegab about patriotism, limiting government, balancing the budget, and accepting \u201cpersonal responsibility\u201d is a fig leaf for the urge to install power where it belongs, among the rich, mostly white, mostly male elite.<\/p>\n<p>But even if you\u2019re not that skeptical, you have to admit that nearly sixty years ago Gore Vidal\u2019s screenplay distills the essence of unchanging conservative values. With almost no changes Robertson&#8217;s speech could be delivered today by the \u201cserious\u201d party patricians. It was all a lie, Stevens says.\u00a0Could Nichols issue a similar judgment? Or is the blame with us because we were lazy, ignorant, and dumb enough to believe the lie?<\/p>\n<p>Well, not all of us were.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>What happens between elections<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Katie-Jamie-600.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47839\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Katie-Jamie-600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Katie-Jamie-600.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Katie-Jamie-600-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Katie-Jamie-600-450x300.jpg 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Katie Porter questions Jamie Dimon, 10 April 2019 at a session of the House Financial Services Committee.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Just as he reduces human agency to displays of cultivated virtue, Nichols relies surprisingly often on a narrow basis for political activity. His \u201cwe\u201d are almost completely characterized as voters. That\u2019s where their power lies. A recent Twitter riposte has a suggestion.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Nichols-tweet-500.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47814\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Nichols-tweet-500.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"215\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Nichols-tweet-500.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Nichols-tweet-500-150x54.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Nichols-tweet-500-500x179.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>For <em>Our Own Worst Enemy<\/em>, the primary role of citizenship, it seems, is that of casting a ballot.\u00a0We are lazy consumers; we need to become informed, committed voters. (Nichols&#8217; entire defense of his position on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/is-democracy-dying-because-americans-are-narcissists\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a <em>Daily Beast<\/em> podcast <\/a>relied on voting statistics.) Constantly invoking \u201cparticipation,\u201d he doesn\u2019t analyze what people might do between elections.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols\u2019 American \u201cwe\u201d doesn\u2019t include activists, street marchers, petitioners, whistleblowers, strikers, strategic investors, boycotters, donors to good causes, voter registration solicitors, or volunteers at food banks and homeless shelters and vaccination centers, let alone professional social workers, medical workers, researchers, teachers, public defenders, civil servants, and others trying to improve the lot of the world with a day job.<\/p>\n<p>What about the media? Despite the faults of much reportage, the fall of Trump owed a good deal to a critical \u00a0press. Academics have also played a role. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.economist.com\/by-invitation\/2021\/09\/24\/noam-chomsky-on-the-cruelty-of-american-imperialism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chomsky<\/a> has long been the leader here, but he has many other counterparts. Without <a href=\"http:\/\/scholarcitizen.williamcronon.net\/2011\/03\/15\/alec\/https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/cifamerica\/2011\/apr\/01\/wisconsin-republicans\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">William Cronin\u2019s research into ALEC<\/a>, would we know about the way this shadowy group produces \u201cmodel bills\u201d that are virtually Xeroxed into legislation throughout the states? (Despite Republicans\u2019 lip service to free speech, Cronin was hounded and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/03\/28\/opinion\/28krugman.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">smeared.)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Every day the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.splcenter.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Southern Poverty Law Center<\/a>, Marc Elias\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.democracydocket.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Democracy Docket<\/a>, Chef\u00a0Jos\u00e9 Andr\u00e9s\u2019 <a href=\"https:\/\/wck.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">World Central\u00a0Kitchen<\/a>, and other organizations exemplify the robust civic virtues that Nichols finds lacking in the l-b. Not all of us on are Facebook all the time; some do political work, and not just as campaign workers.<\/p>\n<p>Some of us even run for office. If Nichols really values mature, precise inquiry, he might pick out some moments in Congressional hearings: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2019\/04\/10\/politics\/katie-porter-jamie-dimon-bank-employees\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Katie Porter poleaxing Jamie Dimon<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/2019\/05\/kamala-harris-william-barr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kamala Harris turning a butterball Attorney General to wriggling evasion<\/a>, or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/americas\/us-politics\/aoc-mark-zuckerberg-video-facebook-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-cambridge-analytica-ads-a9169716.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AOC revealing Mark Zuckerberg&#8217;s mafioso-level amnesia.<\/a>\u00a0Adults do stuff like this all the time.<\/p>\n<p>Such absences are fairly stunning when you consider what was happening outside when Nichols wrote his book. The Republicans\u2019 recent aggressive assault on voting rights came too late to be included in his manuscript, I surmise, but that party\u2019s voter suppression strategies go far back, notably in my state of Wisconsin. They don\u2019t rate notice from Nichols\u2014surprising for a Kremlinologist who might find an affinity with Putin\u2019s \u201cmanaged democracy.\u201d Black Lives Matter is mentioned only as a pretext for the January Capitol invasion. <em>Our Own Worst Enemy<\/em> is silent on the atrocities around the shootings of Black people by white cops or the killings of demonstrators in Charlottesville and Kenosha.<\/p>\n<p>Nichols seems to think that the policies we vote for every few years come principally from the professionals, and not from a constant struggle between demands for social change and the moneyed interests controlling elected officials, as mediated by gatekeepers and agenda-setters. As I reconstruct his view, ideally\u00a0the two US parties hold distinct principles, which they debate reasonably. The principles get hammered into policies, also negotiated and argued over. (Perhaps in Mitt Romney&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/post-partisan\/post\/mitt-romneys-quiet-rooms-revelations\/2012\/09\/19\/8fd8e3da-028e-11e2-9b24-ff730c7f6312_blog.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&#8220;quiet rooms.&#8221;<\/a>) Eventually voters get to decide at the ballot box which policies they prefer.<\/p>\n<p>But of course this story ignores the constant pressures on politicians to enact specific policies benefiting corporations and the wealthy and then to justify them by some public rationale, from &#8220;personal freedom&#8221; to trickle-down economics. Legislators become lobbyists, corporate players join the executive branch, even the Cabinet. The wealthy&#8217;s priorities saturate political culture before, during, and after the moment of an election.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, Nichols doesn&#8217;t treat Occupy, MeToo, people pressing for gun control or clean air or water\u2014all the striving citizens who aren\u2019t at home watching Nascar&#8211;as significant participators in political culture. Yet through public protests and community organizing, many ideas like same-sex marriage and a guaranteed minimum income have become gradually thinkable for a broad public.<\/p>\n<p>None of these activities figures in Nichols\u2019 final chapter, on what \u201cwe\u201d can do. It consists of \u201cmodest proposals,&#8221; a fair description, innocent of Swiftian irony. \u00a0More ambitious solutions are dismissed through a strategy of comparison with other countries. Nichols claims that risky populist symptoms aren\u2019t unique to America, because he finds the same illiberal tendencies in Europe and India. Therefore ameliorating US inequality won\u2019t change things because \u201cmore equal\u201d countries are seeing the same rise in protofascist movements. Education hasn\u2019t worked either, and persuasion won\u2019t: the Trumpists are \u201ctrue believers\u201d in Eric Hoffer\u2019s sense, living on belief fixation. In tweets Nichols insists that talking to them is a waste of time.<\/p>\n<p>To go cinephile again, his deep doubt about change is close to that of the professional jury consultant in <em>Runaway Jury<\/em>\u00a0(2003). Gene Hackman tells his adversary Dustin Hoffman that people don\u2019t care about gun violence, or much of anything.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" id=\"kaltura_player\" title=\"Kaltura Player\" src=\"https:\/\/cdnapisec.kaltura.com\/p\/1660902\/sp\/166090200\/embedIframeJs\/uiconf_id\/25717641\/partner_id\/1660902?iframeembed=true&amp;playerId=kaltura_player&amp;entry_id=1_dxy6icrs&amp;flashvars[streamerType]=auto&amp;flashvars[localizationCode]=en_US&amp;flashvars[leadWithHTML5]=true&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.position]=left&amp;flashvars[sideBarContainer.clickToClose]=true&amp;flashvars[chapters.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[chapters.layout]=vertical&amp;flashvars[chapters.thumbnailRotator]=false&amp;flashvars[streamSelector.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[EmbedPlayer.SpinnerTarget]=videoHolder&amp;flashvars[dualScreen.plugin]=true&amp;flashvars[Kaltura.addCrossoriginToIframe]=true&amp;&amp;wid=1_4v37mune\" width=\"649\" height=\"401\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Yet unlike the uncertainty at the end of <em>Condor<\/em>, in this movie things turn out well. A majority of the jury votes against the gun manufacturers\u2014not thanks to John Cusack\u2019s tricks in their deliberations, but through an appeal to reason and empathy. They voted, he reports, according to their hearts. In the Hollywood manner, the film strategically avoids <em>showing<\/em> us that process, but it holds out some hope that if appealed to, ordinary people can behave with prudence and decency. And our protagonists, Cusack and Rachel Weisz, will turn the payments they extorted from Hackman toward rebuilding a town devastated by a school massacre. This is the Hollywood that conservatives despise. Right-wing fantasies of violence inspire nifty slogans; left-wing fantasies of social justice are brainwashing.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Virtue, and virtue signaling<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Womens-march-600.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47849\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Womens-march-600.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Womens-march-600.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Womens-march-600-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Womens-march-600-450x300.jpg 450w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Women&#8217;s March on Washington, 21 January 2017. (Chang W. Lee, New York Times).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Because Nichols plays down the people\u2019s ability to do the right thing outside of clear-cut policy debates, his proposals are \u00a0oriented toward top-down edicts. He would like to see political parties become stronger bulwarks against demagogues. He\u2019d like to see a \u201csummer of service,\u201d a stint of military training yielding a common experience for all citizens, to replace the \u201cSpartan\u201d volunteer\/ mercenary system we have. He\u2019d advocate changes in the Constitution that could expand the House of Representatives or the number of states (but not any eliminating the Electoral College, which would revert to \u201cpure majoritarianism&#8221;). Ultimately, through voting we are to reform the political class to reflect a more virtuous, \u201cadult\u201d electorate\u2014which \u201cwe\u201d should strive to become.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m less narrow in my hopes, and Nichols himself exemplifies why. He has argued that education and persuasion haven\u2019t proven effective in convincing the l-b that their views are deeply mistaken. Maybe nothing reaches this group, but for whatever reasons, American young people may now lean <a href=\"https:\/\/iop.harvard.edu\/youth-poll\/spring-2021-harvard-youth-poll\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">somewhat more liberal<\/a> than before Trump. Even former Republicans like Nichols (and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2020\/07\/15\/the-shock-troops-never-trumpers-and-right-wing-agitprop\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Lincoln Project <\/a>et al.) have been shocked by how their party fostered the rise of right-wing authoritarianism and now embraces fascism and coup-plotting. Women&#8217;s pushback against Trump turned GOP adherent\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/2021\/09\/20\/jennifer-rubin-republican-trump-resistance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jennifer Rubin<\/a> into something like a feminist.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s also not forget that, for young Nichols and me and many others, the soft power of the media has long delivered contentious, even mildly critical ideas with an emotional punch that policy debates don\u2019t. That seems to be what provoked twentysomething Nichols in <em>3 Days of the Condor. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Perhaps events on the ground have made Nichols less conservative? Not completely. He castigates the Democrats as &#8220;torn\u00a0between totalitarian instincts on one side and complete political malpractice on the other,&#8221; along the way declaring that liberals believe that &#8220;human nature is malleable clay to be reshaped by wise government policy.&#8221; Now that&#8217;s a book-length argument that I&#8217;d like to read, if Nichols addressed expert evolutionary and cultural evidence about human nature.<\/p>\n<p>Still, he thinks abortion should be legal, that the military budget is too big, and that elites \u201ceither by design or incompetence, have enriched themselves at the expense of ordinary citizens.\u201d He deplores class disparities, finds the Founders imperfect humans, acknowledges racism among the rural poor (thanks to a scene from <em>Mississippi Burning<\/em>), declares that racial and gender-based bigotry is unjustifiable, claims that health care is a human right, asserts that the rich should pay more taxes, and announces that popular media sand off the threatening edges of rap and hip-hop to satisfy \u201cthe dominant white demographic.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In his tweets, columns, and\u00a0<em>Our Own Worst Enemy<\/em> these comments are mostly offhand and usually followed by a caveat of one sort or another. He offers no example of how elitists could \u201cincompetently\u201d enrich themselves (maybe in an Adam Sandler movie?), and he casually notes there always will be people who cannot make ends meet (the poor are always with us, just never <em>are<\/em> us). But when in a rare aside he concedes that \u201cthe delayed promises of equality to women and minorities. . . will call justifiably enraged citizens into the streets to demand actions from recalcitrant authorities who have been in power too comfortably and too long,\u201d I had to think back to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2017\/02\/02\/all-my-objections-to-trump-wont-fit-on-one-blog\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">our experience of the Women\u2019s March on Washington<\/a>. The timing was just right\u2014the day after the inauguration, an immediate thrust in the face of the looming threat. Voters weren\u2019t ready to wait till the next election to confront a career criminal who was, to everyone who had eyes to see, a catastrophic threat to our common good.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>You can&#8217;t just blame angry, sybaritic voters. The lumpen-bourgeoisie have long been there, ripe for capture. The blame lies centrally with the Republican Party. It more or less accidentally discovered in Donald Trump the figure whose madness could merge the alt-right fringes with the mainstream party elites, and thus provide a juggernaut for seizing power and holding it in perpetuity.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>One powerful counterweight to Nichols&#8217; book is Adam Serwer&#8217;s\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Cruelty-Point-Present-Future-America\/dp\/0593230809\/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3EEXH0GWFPR23&amp;dchild=1&amp;keywords=the+cruelty+is+the+point&amp;qid=1632225888&amp;s=books&amp;sprefix=the+cruelty%2Cstripbooks%2C187&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Cruelty Is the Point: The Past, Present, and Future of Trump&#8217;s America<\/a><\/em>, a book whose historical and analytical acumen fulfill all Nichols&#8217; demands for mature, nuanced judgment. Same goes for Serwer&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/ideas\/archive\/2021\/09\/five-ways-donald-trump-tried-coup\/620157\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">recent outline<\/a> of the now-exposed Eastman memo. A little more gonzo, but well-documented, is the survey of earlier GOP voter suppression in Greg Palast and Ted Rall&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/How-Trump-Stole-2020-Americas\/dp\/1644210568\/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=how+trump+stole+2020&amp;qid=1632260560&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>How Trump Stole 2020: The Hunt for America&#8217;s Vanished Voters<\/em>\u00a0<\/a>(Seven Stories Press, 2020). Just as important, Thomas Frank&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/People-No-Populism-Fight-Democracy\/dp\/1250220114\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The People, No: A Brief History of Anti-Populism<\/em><\/a> (Holt, 2020) saw where Nichols was going in <em>The Death of Expertise:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>What has happened, the thinkers of the Beltway and the C-Suite tell us, is that the common folk have declared independence from experts and along the way from reality itself. . . [Nichols] equated populism with &#8220;the celebration of ignorance.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Republican comments from the 1940s come from the collection of Congressional speeches in Rex Stout&#8217;s <em>The Illustrious Dunderheads<\/em> (Knopf, 1942).\u00a0As you see, Gore Vidal, one of America&#8217;s best essayists, disclosed many of these pervasive forces in the hallowed 1970s. My excerpts come from his provocative collection, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/United-States-1952-1992-Gore-Vidal\/dp\/0679414894\/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=vidal+united+states&amp;qid=1632226150&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">United States: Essays 1952-1992.\u00a0<\/a><\/em>Robert Hughes&#8217; <a href=\"https:\/\/smile.amazon.com\/Culture-Complaint-Fraying-American-Lectures\/dp\/0195076761\/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&amp;keywords=hughes+culture+of+complaint&amp;qid=1632496369&amp;s=books&amp;sr=1-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Culture of Complaint: The Fraying of America\u00a0<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(Knopf, 1993) also anticipated some of Nichols&#8217; arguments, although he emphasizes &#8220;Political Correctness&#8221; in the intelligentsia more than &#8220;Patriotic Correctness&#8221; among the malcontents.<\/p>\n<p>Nicholas Grossman admirably lays bare Ross Douthat&#8217;s sophistries\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thebulwark.com\/the-non-education-of-ross-douthat\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here.\u00a0<\/a> I&#8217;ll just add that \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/09\/18\/opinion\/covid-coronavirus-death.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">most recently<\/a>, Douthat argues that we ought not to get too excited by the current rate of 1 in 500 US Covid deaths because it could have been much worse&#8211;say, 1 in 50&#8211;and then people would have taken notice. &#8220;If the fatality figures were one-tenth as high, I suspect there would be much more internal liberal debate over the wisdom of the sweeping early response. And if they were 10 times higher, I think there might have been more red-state support for public-health restrictions of all kinds.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This from the pundit who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/projects\/cp\/opinion\/election-night-2016\/can-we-expect-an-early-night\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">confidently\u00a0predicted<\/a> that Hillary Clinton would win\u00a0the Electoral College with 322 votes. Four years later, under the title <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/10\/10\/opinion\/sunday\/trump-election-authoritarianism.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&#8220;There Will Be No Trump Coup,&#8221; <\/a>he declared that if Trump lost he would &#8220;not\u00a0attempt some wild resistance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>Meanwhile, the scenarios that have been spun out in reputable publications \u2014 where Trump induces Republican state legislatures to overrule the clear outcome in their states or militia violence intimidates the Supreme Court into vacating a Biden victory \u2014 bear no relationship to the Trump presidency we\u2019ve actually experienced.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Again, who is <em>we<\/em>? And why does this man still have a job?<\/p>\n<p>For what it&#8217;s worth,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2018\/06\/19\/the-pawns\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">my suggestion<\/a>\u00a0three years ago that the Trump regime constituted a slow-moving fascist coup has become more plausible to many. (Surprisingly, as I finish this entry, none other than <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/2021\/09\/23\/robert-kagan-constitutional-crisis\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Robert Kagan<\/a>.) Other entries on this site include <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2018\/11\/04\/reliable-narrators-telling-tales-on-trump\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">praise for Omarosa&#8217;s insights<\/a> in <em>Unhinged<\/em>; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2020\/07\/15\/the-shock-troops-never-trumpers-and-right-wing-agitprop\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">guarded acceptance of the comradeship<\/a> of the Lincoln Project; the cinematic dimensions of<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2021\/03\/09\/a-fast-paced-cinematic-impeachment-trial\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> the second impeachment trial<\/a>; the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2021\/01\/19\/repost-our-daily-barbarisms-leo-hurwitzs-strange-victory-1948\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">currency <\/a>of a classic documentary; and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2020\/10\/16\/little-stabs-at-happiness-6-breathe\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the political use of associational form<\/a> in Demi Lovato&#8217;s rendition of &#8220;Commander in Chief.&#8221; On Romney and Obama as storytellers, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2012\/10\/23\/so-these-two-candidates-walk-into-a-bar\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">see here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Supertrump-700.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-47828\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Supertrump-700.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"700\" height=\"392\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Supertrump-700.jpg 700w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Supertrump-700-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Supertrump-700-500x280.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From studying the polls, I would guess that about a third of the American people at any given moment would welcome a fascist state. Gore Vidal, 1975 DB here: For American conservatives, Hollywood is a prime villain, coarsening the culture and spreading liberal propaganda. Yet when Reagan promised to veto tax-increase legislation, he quoted Dirty [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film-comments","category-hollywood-aesthetic-traditions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47786"}],"version-history":[{"count":69,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47786\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48053,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47786\/revisions\/48053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}