{"id":32793,"date":"2015-12-05T21:37:57","date_gmt":"2015-12-06T03:37:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=32793"},"modified":"2015-12-06T12:19:53","modified_gmt":"2015-12-06T18:19:53","slug":"the-hateful-eight-the-boys-behind-the-booth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2015\/12\/05\/the-hateful-eight-the-boys-behind-the-booth\/","title":{"rendered":"THE HATEFUL EIGHT: The boys behind the booth"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"See<\/a><\/p>\n

DB here:<\/p>\n

By now everybody knows that Tarantino’s forthcoming\u00a0The Hateful Eight<\/em>\u00a0was shot on film in the Ultra Panavision 70 format. This anamorphic\u00a0widescreen process yields a projected aspect ratio\u00a0of 2.76–in a word, humongous. An early version of it, MGM Camera 65,\u00a0was employed on Ben-Hur<\/em> (1959), but Panavision quickly developed a new generation of cameras and renamed the process. It wasn’t heavily used; supposedly Khartoum<\/em> (1966) was the\u00a0last film shot in the format.<\/p>\n

The process by which Tarantino, ace cinematographer Robert Richardson, and the enthusiastic\u00a0boffins\u00a0at Panavision revived Ultra Panavision 70 is detailed \u00a0in the current American Cinematographer<\/em><\/a> (alas, not yet online). The production is an extraordinary tale. But what about exhibition? Luckily, the widescreen fans among us can glean a lot about that from veteran projectionist Paul Rayton’s interview with Chapin Cutler<\/a>, co-owner of Boston Light & Sound<\/a>. It was the task of Chapin and his team\u00a0to find over 100 projectors, refurbish them, test them, and set them up in theatres all over America.<\/p>\n

Chapin is a legendary figure in movie exhibition.\u00a0Trained as a projectionist during\u00a0his college years, he and Larry Shaw have\u00a0made BL&S one of the very\u00a0top companies for installation and maintenance of theatre projection equipment. He has supervised theatrical setups at festivals (Sundance, Telluride, TCM), industry gatherings (CinemaCon), and at some of the world’s top-notch theatres.<\/p>\n

He’s more than a professional’s professional: He loves film and prides himself on delivering a powerhouse show. He was a natural choice for a movie geek like Tarantino to arrange the roadshow screenings of The Hateful Eight<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Chapin has discussed the nearly military precision necessary to fulfill Tarantino’s mandate in The New York Times<\/em><\/a> and The Boston Globe<\/a><\/em>. You should read these pieces for essential background.\u00a0When Chapin added some new information courtesy of the listserv of the Art House Convergence<\/a>, I jumped at the chance to include you in the audience. I know that many of our readers are keen to devour whatever they can learn about this film, one of the year’s major American releases.<\/p>\n

So here are Chapin’s notes on how you prepare and ship out 100+ 70mm film prints.<\/p>\n

For those of you that are interested in these things, attached is a picture of our “platter farm” in Valencia CA. This is where all the prints are being made up. <\/strong><\/p>\n

The space before, in Academy ratio.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Before\"<\/p>\n

The space after, in sort of Ultra Panavision.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"after<\/a><\/p>\n

We are getting the prints as 1000 ft. loads, so we have to assemble 20 rolls to make a print up.<\/strong><\/p>\n

About 90 of the prints will be made up for platter operation and shipped totally assembled. The prints are being ultrasonically welded so that it is one continuous piece of film; no splices. The remaining prints are going out for reel to reel houses.<\/strong><\/p>\n

On\u00a0the right of the frame above you can see part of\u00a0one of the shipping cases. It is 5 ft. x 5 ft. by 1 ft. thick. When loaded, it weighs about 400 lbs. On the platter next to it, there is a partially disassembled platter reel. With the reel full, out of the box, the film and reel weigh about 250 lbs. Four people can easily lift it onto a platter deck.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We have a dedicated team of four folks working 7 days a week to get this done.<\/strong><\/p>\n

All this\u00a0makes you appreciate the effort behind the scenes that makes this remarkable enterprise\u00a0work. (So far, there have been a couple of problematic press\u00a0screenings, but a dozen or so other shows–notably last night’s SAG screening<\/a> at the Egyptian–have gone off perfectly.) Whatever you think of Tarantino as a filmmaker (I like him<\/a>),\u00a0he deserves credit for exposing a new generation to the volcanic\u00a0fun of a roadshow presentation. And we should thank Chapin, the guru\u00a0with the bandit mustache, as well.<\/p>\n

Photo credits: Chas. Phillips.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"hat<\/a><\/p>\n

The Hateful Eight<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

DB here: By now everybody knows that Tarantino’s forthcoming\u00a0The Hateful Eight\u00a0was shot on film in the Ultra Panavision 70 format. This anamorphic\u00a0widescreen process yields a projected aspect ratio\u00a0of 2.76–in a word, humongous. An early version of it, MGM Camera 65,\u00a0was employed on Ben-Hur (1959), but Panavision quickly developed a new generation of cameras and renamed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[123,72,57,130,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-directors-tarantino","category-film-technique-widescreen","category-hollywood-aesthetic-traditions","category-movie-theatres","category-people-we-like"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32793"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32793\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32806,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32793\/revisions\/32806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}