![\"exiled-1a-400.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/exiled-1a-400.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n
\n
<\/p>\n
Exiled<\/em><\/p>\n \n Kristin writes:<\/p>\n \u201cThe Hobbit Film: New Developments\u201d (<\/span>January 13, 2007<\/span>)<\/span><\/p>\n \n In this entry<\/a> I discussed Bob Shaye’s recent claim that Peter Jackson would never get a chance to direct The Hobbit <\/em>for New Line. I mentioned that one of the factors involved in the negotiations about who would direct is that the production rights will eventually revert to producer Saul Zaentz. I didn\u2019t know the length of the option on those rights, which New Line currently holds. The January issue of the fantasy\/sci fic magazine Locus<\/em> says that the rights will revert to Zaentz in 2009.<\/p>\n \n Zaentz had owned the rights since the mid-1970s and sold them to Miramax in early 1997. Miramax had the two-film version of The Lord of the Rings<\/em> in pre-production for about 18 months and then sold the rights to New Line in August of 1998. I don\u2019t know what the source of Locus<\/em>\u2019 information is, but a twelve-month option would seem pretty plausible.<\/p>\n \n If that information is correct, New Line only has about two years to get the actual making of the film underway. It takes years for any big film to lumber into production in Hollywood these days, so the studio doesn\u2019t have a lot of room to wiggle.<\/p>\n \n \n \n \u201cBy Annie Standards\u201d (<\/span>December 14, 2006<\/span>)<\/span><\/p>\n \n Here<\/a> I talked about methods for publicizing animated features. One way, I suggested, would be to foster audience interest in the various animation awards other than the Oscars. I remarked, \u201cUnder Academy rules, only three animated features can be nominated in any year unless sixteen or more such features are released that year. Then the number of nominations jumps to five, but so far that hasn\u2019t happened. It may finally happen this year, if all sixteen features currently under consideration qualify under Academy rules.\u201d<\/p>\n \n Close, but not close enough. On January 11, Variety<\/em> announced<\/a> that one film, Luc Besson\u2019s Arthur and the Invisibles<\/em>, had been disqualified as an animated feature. To qualify, a film must have at least 75% animated footage, and Arthur<\/em> has too much live action.<\/p>\n \n With the number of qualifying features down to fifteen, only three can be nominated. Probably Cars<\/em> will win, as I predicted in the original entry. It just won the Golden Globe in the newly established Animated Film category.<\/p>\n \n \n \n \u201cSnakes, No, Borat, Yes: Not All Internet Publicity Is the Same\u201d (<\/span>January 7, 2007<\/span>)<\/span><\/p>\n \n Here<\/a> I suggested some reasons why Snakes on a Plane<\/em> failed at the box office and Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan<\/em> succeeded, despite the fact that both garnered considerable fan-generated publicity on the internet. I mentioned that Sacha Baren Cohen had appeared on talk shows in character as Borat rather than <\/span>in persona proper<\/em>: <\/span><\/em>\u201cEach appearance by \u201cBorat,\u201d supposedly there to talk about the film, ended up being a hilarious performance by Cohen, ad-libbing on everything around him\u2014the chairs, the coffee mugs, the cameras, the audience. Spectators ended up with one impression about the film: it was about this incredibly funny guy doing incredibly funny things.\u201d<\/p>\n \n Trying to correct the widespread assumption that Borat<\/em> was an improvised film, the January 8-14 issue of Variety<\/em> ran a story<\/a> about how Cohen worked with three scriptwriters, Peter Baynham, Dan Mazer, and Anthony \u201cAnt\u201d Hines: \u201cThe scribes even concoct Cohen\u2019s dialogue for his promo appearances on \u2018The Tonight Show\u2019 and \u2018Live With Regis and Kelly.\u2019\u201d Although Cohen presumably ad-libs to meet specific circumstances of each talk show, the publicity appearances are even more controlled by Cohen than I had assumed.<\/p>\n \n I also remarked that it is difficult to judge the degree to which the film manipulated the scenes of Borat<\/em>\u2019s encounters with real people. Especially in terms of editing and sound techniques, there was clearly much opportunity for this manipulation. The same Variety<\/em> story goes on to say, \u201cMuch of the script had to be altered depending on how situations unravel. This means the writers ultimately end up producing the equivalent of multiple scripts, much of which ends up on the cutting room floor.\u201d I\u2019m not sure how chunks of scripts can end up on the cutting-room floor, but the point is that the filmmakers were carefully stitching the \u201cdocumentary\u201d scenes together on the script level and presumably would do so through stylistic means as well.<\/p>\n \n David writes:<\/p>\n \n Back to the Hotel<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n The Uchoten Hotel<\/em> (aka Suite Dreams<\/em>, blogged here<\/a>) has acquired yet another English-language title: Hotel Avanti<\/em>. It made it to #93 on Variety<\/em>‘s list of the world’s 100 top-grossing films, with $51 million box office in Japan and none yet recorded overseas.<\/p>\n Speaking of Variety<\/em>‘s list, the highest-grossing non-English language item turns out to be Bong Joon-ho’s Korean hit The Host<\/em> (#59 at $84 million), due out in the US any month now. Only ten non-English-speaking films made the top 100, and of those, three were European (including Volver<\/em>) but all the rest were Asian: Chinese (Fearless<\/em>), Korean (The Host<\/em> and King and Clown<\/em>), and Japanese (Tales from Earthsea<\/em>, Umizaru 2 Limit of Love<\/em>, Hotel Avanti<\/em>, and Japan Sinks<\/em>–no rude remarks, please).<\/p>\n The entire list is in the 15-21 January hard copy of Variety<\/em>, p. 15, but evidently it isn’t yet available on the paper’s site.<\/p>\n \n More on Johnnie To<\/span><\/p>\n In an earlier blog I praised Johnnie To as a director who shot and cut<\/a> PTU<\/em> smoothly and crisply. I waited through the fall, hoping somehow to see To’s latest, Exiled<\/em>, on the big screen at one festival or another. No such luck. So last night I broke down and watched the DVD<\/a>. Making full use of the widescreen format, To shows that classic technique can be at once rigorous and imaginative.<\/p>\n Exiled <\/em>was more visually engaging than any US film I can recall last year, including Miami Vice<\/em>. It immediately became my Best Film of 2006 That I Saw in 2007. (Runner-up: Children of Men<\/em>.) I visited Milkyway while the film was being shot, and I hope to blog about the result in a future entry.<\/p>\n At Large on the Internets<\/span><\/p>\n On this very site<\/a>, I’ve posted a new essay on action movies. <\/em> <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Exiled Kristin writes: \u201cThe Hobbit Film: New Developments\u201d (January 13, 2007) In this entry I discussed Bob Shaye’s recent claim that Peter Jackson would never get a chance to direct The Hobbit for New Line. I mentioned that one of the factors involved in the negotiations about who would direct is that the production rights […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,4,26,61,1,6,5,40,37,23,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-327","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-animation","category-asian-cinema","category-directors-bong-joon-ho","category-directors-johnnie-to-kei-fung","category-film-comments","category-film-industry","category-film-technique","category-hollywood-the-business","category-national-cinemas-hong-kong","category-national-cinemas-japan","category-national-cinemas-korea"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9064,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327\/revisions\/9064"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nAnnie Frisbie interviewed me for the Zoom-In podcast here<\/a>. Annie is also blogging\/reviewing Sundance films here<\/a>.
\nFox Independent visited Madison and posted videos on its site. The setup and the interview with filmmaker and teacher Erik Gunneson are here<\/a>. An interview with me is here<\/a>.
\n <\/em> <\/em> <\/p>\n