{"id":3235,"date":"2008-12-31T14:29:30","date_gmt":"2008-12-31T19:29:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=3235"},"modified":"2020-08-06T20:22:29","modified_gmt":"2020-08-07T01:22:29","slug":"the-10-best-films-of-the-year-1918","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2008\/12\/31\/the-10-best-films-of-the-year-1918\/","title":{"rendered":"The ten best films of . . . 1918"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/stella-maris.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3238\" title=\"stella-maris\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/stella-maris.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/stella-maris.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/stella-maris-150x112.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/stella-maris-400x300.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Kristin here&#8211;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">We ended 2007 with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=1779\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a salute to the 90<sup>th<\/sup> anniversary<\/a> of the solidification of the classical Hollywood filmmaking system. 1917 was not only the year when all the guidelines\u2014continuity editing, three-point lighting, and unified story structure\u2014gelled in American cinema. It was also one of those years (like 1913, 1927, and 1939) when a burst of creativity took place internationally. For those years, it\u2019s hard to keep one\u2019s greats list to ten.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Enough of you enjoyed that entry that we thought we would come up with another list to end 2008. For some reason, 1918 doesn\u2019t yield the plethora of great films that obviously should go on such a list. Maybe it\u2019s the sheer accident of preservation. After a string of masterpieces from Douglas Fairbanks in 1917, there seems to be a dearth of his films extant from the following year. Some filmmakers, like Cecil B. De Mille, simply released fewer films in 1918. And of course, some masterpieces may still lie gathering dust on archive shelves, waiting to be discovered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Still, great films were made that year, some familiar\u2014some that should be better known. Some are available on DVD, and some are excellent candidates for release by some of the enterprising companies like Kino International, Image Entertainment, and Flicker Alley.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">1. The list isn\u2019t in rank order, but for me the outstanding film of 1918 is <em>Berg-Ejvind och hans hustru<\/em>, better known to most as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Outlaw-His-Wife-Victor-Sjostrom\/dp\/B0018W2KZW\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230655605&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Outlaw and His Wife<\/em>,<\/a> by Victor Sj\u00f6str\u00f6m. This tale of an enduring love between a man <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-outlaw-and-his-wife.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3243 alignleft\" title=\"the-outlaw-and-his-wife\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-outlaw-and-his-wife.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"356\" height=\"271\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-outlaw-and-his-wife.jpg 356w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-outlaw-and-his-wife-150x114.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 356px) 100vw, 356px\" \/><\/a>hunted by the police and a rich landowner who falls in love with him, and, as one title says, \u201cHearth and home and every man\u2019s respect\u2014she gave it all up for his sake.\u201d The result is one of the cinema\u2019s great romances as the pair flees to the mountains and spend the rest of their lives amidst the natural landscapes that create spectacular backdrops for the action.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">This year Kino also brought out a disc with the dynamite double bill of two tragedies <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Man-There-Was-Ingeborg-Holm\/dp\/B0018W2L0G\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230655605&amp;sr=1-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> <em>Ingeborg Holm<\/em> (1913) and <em>Terje Vigen<\/em> (1916)<\/a><em>.<\/em> David and I have both written about the staging in <em>Ingeborg Holm<\/em>, and David has had much to say on tableau staging in 1910s cinema. Watch these three films, and you will understand why we consider Sj\u00f6str\u00f6m perhaps <em>the<\/em> great director of the decade. It\u2019s a shame that more of his films are not available yet in the U.S. Buy copies of these, and maybe Kino will bring more of them out.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">2. Another master of this era, Louis Feuillade, made a sequel to his <em>Judex<\/em> (1916): <em>La Nouvelle Mission de Judex<\/em>. David discusses both in the second chapter of his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Figures-Traced-Light-Cinematic-Staging\/dp\/0520241975\/ref=ed_oe_p\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Figures Traced in Light<\/em><\/a>. Although <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Judex-Deluxe-Ren%C3%A9-Crest%C3%A9\/dp\/B0001Y4MJA\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230657122&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Judex<\/em><\/a> is available on DVD, so far the second serial is not.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">3. I suspect that <em>Hearts of the World<\/em> is one of those D. W. Griffith features that a lot of film enthusiasts have heard of but not seen. Remarkably, it\u2019s not available on DVD. (Keep your old laserdisc if you\u2019ve got one!) I have to admit, it\u2019s not one of my favorite Griffiths, though it does have a charming performance by Dorothy Gish and contains scenes that were actually shot near the front lines in France.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">4. Ernst Lubitsch was making the transition from shorts to features in 1917 and 1918. While <em>Carmen<\/em> is historically important for his development toward his mature style, most audiences these days would probably find<em> Ich m\u00f6chte kein Mann sein<\/em> (\u201cI don\u2019t want to be a man\u201d) more entertaining. It\u2019s a comedy about an independent young lady who escapes her strict governess and guardian by going out on the town disguised as a man\u2014in the process joining her guardian without his recognizing her (see the frame at the bottom). Its star, Ossi Oswalda, was an outgoing blonde dynamo, quite different from Pola Negri, whom Lubitsch turned to for his later historical epics.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Kino has made several of Lubitsch\u2019s films from the late 1910s and early 1920s available. <em>Ich m\u00f6chte kein Mann sein<\/em> can be bought on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Lubitsch-Berlin-Oyster-Princess-Dont\/dp\/B000JLQPWC\/ref=sr_1_17?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230658020&amp;sr=1-17\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a single disc<\/a> with <em>Die Austerinprinzessin<\/em> (\u201cThe Oyster Princess,\u201d 1919), another Oswalda comedy. I\u2019d recommend getting it as part of the larger <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Lubitsch-Berlin-Princess-Sumurun-Wildcat\/dp\/B000XA5K0M\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230657999&amp;sr=1-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cLubitsch in Berlin\u201d<\/a> set, which also includes the hilariously imaginative <em>Die Puppe<\/em> (\u201cThe Doll,\u201d 1919), the Expressionist satire <em>Die Bergkatze<\/em> (\u201cThe Wildcat,\u201d with Negri in her one comic role for Lubitsch, 1921), an Arabian-nights epic <em>Sumurun<\/em> (1920), and the historical epic <em>Anna Boleyn<\/em> (1921), as well as a documentary on Lubitsch.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">5. In 1918 Cecil B. De Mille made a film that would change his career\u2019s trajectory:<em> Old Wives for New<\/em>. At the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/old-wives-for-new.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3244 alignright\" title=\"old-wives-for-new\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/old-wives-for-new.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"306\" height=\"227\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/old-wives-for-new.jpg 306w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/old-wives-for-new-150x111.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 306px) 100vw, 306px\" \/><\/a>time, this romantic drama that seemed risqu\u00e9 in its casual depiction of adultery, golddiggers, and especially divorce as creating a happy outcome. Up to that point De Mille had been working in a whole range of genres, creating imaginative films that helped define the classical style. The success of <em>Old Wives for New<\/em> led him to specialize in spicy romances known for their <em>haute couture<\/em> costumes. The film is available on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Old-Wives-New-Whispering-Chorus\/dp\/B000BC8T0K\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230824883&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a disc from Image<\/a> that includes De Mille\u2019s other major film of 1918, <em>The Whispering Chorus<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">6. <em>Hell Bent<\/em>, by John Ford, was long thought to be among his many lost westerns from the early years of his career. It was rediscovered in the Czechoslovakian archive and shown years ago in Pordenone at the Il Giornate del Cinema Muto festival. I must confess that I don\u2019t remember it very well, apart from one spectacular tilt downwards as a stagecoach (?) races down a winding mountain road. Not as good as <em>Straight Shooting<\/em>, and <em>Hell Bent<\/em> survives in rocky shape (perhaps too much so for DVD release), but Ford films of this era are so rare that I\u2019ve listed this one.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">7. Like Lubitsch, in the late 1910s Charlie Chaplin was making a gradual transition from shorts to features. In 1916 and 1917 he released a remarkable string of Mutual two-reelers, from <em>The Rink<\/em> (December 1916) to <em>The Adventurer<\/em> (October 1917). In 1918, with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Chaplin-Revue-Disc-Special\/dp\/B00017LVLE\/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230824936&amp;sr=1-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>A Dog\u2019s Life<\/em> and <em>Shoulder Arms<\/em><\/a>, he increased the films\u2019 length to three reels, or roughly 45 minutes, and started releasing through First National. He also cut back on the number of titles released each year. Apart from a brief promotional film for war bonds, <em>A Dog\u2019s Life<\/em> and <em>Shoulder Arms<\/em> were his only 1918 releases. Which is better? I suppose most people would say <em>Shoulder Arms<\/em>. To me it\u2019s a toss-up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">8. David and I started attending Il Giornate del Cinema Muto in 1986, when the festival was launching its great series of national retrospectives. In quick succession, these retrospectives revealed three hitherto virtually unknown but major auteurs of the 1910s: the Swede, Georg af Klercker, in 1986; the Russian, Evgeni Bauer, in 1989; and the German Franz Hofer, in 1990. Bauer\u2019s career ended with his death in 1917. Hofer remained active until the early 1930s. The Giornate\u2019s German program contained only six of his films, however, and those from the 1913-1915 period. I suspect that means the later teens titles are lost.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">In contrast, nearly all of af Klercker\u2019s films survive, mostly in the original negatives. The prints shown at Pordenone were stunning. The director had a great eye for settings, using beaded curtains, mirrors, and other elements to considerable effect. He made three films in 1918: <em>Fyrvaktarens dotter, Nobelpristagaren,Nattliga toner<\/em>, the first two of which were shown in the 1986 retrospective.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Unfortunately since then the films have not been made widely available, either in prints or on DVD. Having not seen the two titles just mentioned since 1986, I can\u2019t say that I remember them well enough to judge between them. So I\u2019ll just leave all three films here, along with the advice to seize any chance you may get to see those or af Klercker\u2019s other films.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">(Given how little known af Klercker\u2019s work is outside Sweden, I should point out a major English-language piece on the director\u2019s style, Astrid S\u00f6derbergh Widding\u2019s \u201cTowards Classical Narration? Georg af Klercker in Context,\u201d in editors John Fullerton and Jan Olsson\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Nordic-Explorations-Stockholm-Studies-Distributed\/dp\/1864620552\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1230756423&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Nordic Explorations: Film Before 1930<\/em><\/a> [Sydney: John Libbey, 1999].)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">9. <em>Stella Maris<\/em>, directed by Marshall Neilan, was the first of five features Mary Pickford starred in in 1918. Its reputation lies mainly in the fact that Pickford played a double role, the bed-bound but lovely title character, and an ugly, slightly deformed orphan. In its outline, the story sounds abstract and overly symmetrical. Stella Maris\u2019s relatives shut her off from all ugliness in the world, keeping her in happy innocence well into her teens. Unity, the orphan, has known nothing but deprivation. As Stella comes to glimpse the grim side of life, Unity is adopted and has glimpses of the beauties enjoyed by the rich. Both become miserable as a result.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The overall implication is pretty grim. Stella\u2019s world is initially wonderful only because everyone lies to her. She becomes embittered when she finally discovers this. At the heart of the tale is the deception that life is beautiful. Unity, who has not been deceived, knows better from the start. Even one brief reference to the war, as a troupe of soldiers passes by the estate where Stella lives, makes it seem tragic\u2014this in a film that came out about two months after the U.S. had entered World War I.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The balance between the two characters is made less artificial than it might sound by Pickford\u2019s extraordinary performance\u2014not so much as Stella, who is a rather passive version of the typical Pickford persona, but as Unity. The waif\u2019s frequent disappointments and outright suffering create a strong effect that shadows even the quasi-happy ending. It\u2019s a beautifully made film as well, with the use of glamorous backlight (as in the image at the top of this entry). <em>Stella Maris<\/em> is available on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Stella-Maris-Mary-Pickford\/dp\/B00004S89T\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230825129&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DVD from Image<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">10. I have been hard put to find a feature to round out the list, so I\u2019m substituting a group of shorts. They\u2019re not masterpieces by any means, but each displays the talents of a great silent comic well on the way toward his most fruitful period.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">There\u2019s no single great film to mark Harold Lloyd\u2019s transition, but during 1918 he was developing his \u201cglasses\u201d character. He had had a modest success with his \u201cLonesome Luke\u201d series from 1915 to 1917, where he essentially created a variant of Chaplin. In September, 1917, Lloyd first wore his famous black, lens-less glasses in <em>Over the Fence<\/em>. His early one-reelers wearing those glasses were still sheer slapstick, with little of the characterization that he would later develop to go with his new look. Arguably it was 1919 or even 1920 before he had fully nailed that persona. Still, during 1918 one can see him groping toward the formula.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Kino\u2019s \u201cThe Harold Lloyd Collection\u201d volumes contain four films from that year, all co-starring Lloyd\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-non-stop-kid.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3245 alignleft\" title=\"the-non-stop-kid\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-non-stop-kid.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"356\" height=\"262\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-non-stop-kid.jpg 356w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-non-stop-kid-150x110.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 356px) 100vw, 356px\" \/><\/a>regular co-stars, Snub Pollard and Bebe Daniels. <em>The Non Stop Kid<\/em> (the title on the film; filmographies mistakenly give it as <em>The Non-Stop Kid;<\/em> May 21), <em>Two-Gun Gussie<\/em> (May 19), <em>The City Slicker<\/em> (June 2, all three on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Harold-Lloyd-Collection-Slapstick-Symposium\/dp\/B000AM4PJ0\/ref=pd_bxgy_d_text_b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">volume 2<\/a>), and <em>Are Crooks Dishonest?<\/em> (June 23, on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Harold-Lloyd-Collection-Slapstick-Symposium\/dp\/B0002CHIEM\/ref=pd_bxgy_d_text_b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">volume 1<\/a>). The development clearly came in fits and starts. <em>Two-Gun Gussie<\/em> and <em>Are Crooks Dishonest?<\/em> are both slapstick affairs involving tricks and mistaken identify. <em>The Non Stop Kid<\/em>, though, has Lloyd in a more familiar situation, using his wits to foil a crowd of suitors and win the heroine\u2019s hand. <em>The City Slicker<\/em> has a similar feel to it, though unfortunately the end is missing. <em>The Non Stop Kid<\/em> also has Lloyd donning a disguise in the form of a false moustache that somewhat resembles the one he had worn as Luke. This scene has a startling effect, blending the glasses character and the Luke character.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">1917 and 1918 formed the high point of the string of comic shorts directed by Fatty Arbuckle, in which he also co-starred with Buster Keaton and Al St. John. When Keaton went solo, he proved to be a far better director than Arbuckle. Arbuckle tended to simply face his camera perpendicularly toward the back of the set for every shot, just cutting to whatever scale of framing would best display a gag. Here it\u2019s the perfectly timed and executed gags that dazzle, and the films are often hilarious. In 1918, the team made <em>The Bell Boy<\/em>, <em>Moonshine<\/em>, <em>Out West<\/em>, <em>Good Night Nurse<\/em>, and <em>The Cook<\/em>. The latter shows off Arbuckle and Keaton\u2019s dexterity at juggling props and Fatty\u2019s surprising grace, as when he improvises a Salome dance with a head of lettuce standing in for that of John the Baptist!<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">The 13 surviving Arbuckle-Keaton films (some with missing bits) are available on Eureka\u2019s definitive boxed set, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/Complete-Buster-Keaton-Masters-Cinema\/dp\/B000I5XN7E\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230752626&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cBuster Keaton: The Complete Short Films.\u201d<\/a> (That\u2019s Region 2 format only, and available from Amazon UK.) Image\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Best-Arbuckle-Keaton-Collection\/dp\/B00006IUIU\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230825403&amp;sr=1-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cThe Best Arbuckle Keaton Collection\u201d<\/a> has 12 films, missing only the more recently rediscovered <em>The Cook<\/em>. Image brought out <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Cook-Other-Treasures-Glen-Cavender\/dp\/B00007L4MK\/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230751989&amp;sr=1-7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>The Cook<\/em><\/a> on a disc with Arbuckle\u2019s <em>A Reckless Romeo<\/em> (1917, sans Keaton). Kino\u2019s two separately available volumes of \u201cArbuckle &amp; Keaton\u201d (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Arbuckle-Keaton-Vol-1-Buster\/dp\/B00005ALM3\/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;s=dvd&amp;qid=1230751989&amp;sr=1-10\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Arbuckle-Keaton-Vol-Joe-Bordeaux\/dp\/B00005ALM4\/ref=pd_bxgy_d_img_b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>) contain 10 shorts total, again missing <em>The Cook<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Apart from all these films, it\u2019s worth noting that in the world of animation, 1918 saw the release of Winsor McCay\u2019s fourth cartoon, <em>The Sinking of the Lusitania<\/em>, and Dave Fleischer\u2019s first, <em>Out of the Inkwell<\/em>, which launched the enduring series.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">Next year, 1919. Happy 2009 to all our readers!<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/ich-mochte-kein-mann-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3241\" title=\"ich-mochte-kein-mann-2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/ich-mochte-kein-mann-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"382\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/ich-mochte-kein-mann-2.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/ich-mochte-kein-mann-2-150x114.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/ich-mochte-kein-mann-2-392x300.jpg 392w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kristin here&#8211; We ended 2007 with a salute to the 90th anniversary of the solidification of the classical Hollywood filmmaking system. 1917 was not only the year when all the guidelines\u2014continuity editing, three-point lighting, and unified story structure\u2014gelled in American cinema. It was also one of those years (like 1913, 1927, and 1939) when a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[156,157,154,131,104,87,242,88,94,1,12,93,68,294],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actors-fairbanks","category-actors-lloyd","category-directors-chaplin","category-directors-ford","category-directors-griffith","category-directors-keaton","category-directors-lloyd","category-directors-lubitsch","category-directors-sjostrom","category-film-comments","category-film-history","category-national-cinemas-sweden","category-silent-film","category-the-ten-best-films-of"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3235"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3235\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45276,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3235\/revisions\/45276"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}