{"id":3036,"date":"2008-11-20T14:25:37","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T19:25:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=3036"},"modified":"2018-12-05T15:17:59","modified_gmt":"2018-12-05T21:17:59","slug":"its-the-80s-stupid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2008\/11\/20\/its-the-80s-stupid\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s the 80s, stupid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--StartFragment--><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpFirst\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/choose-me-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3037\" title=\"choose-me-1\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/choose-me-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"275\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/choose-me-1.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/choose-me-1-150x82.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpFirst\"><em>Choose Me<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpFirst\">DB here:<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpFirst\">In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=2674\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">an earlier post<\/a>, I proposed that film historians can&#8217;t safely assume that decades mark off meaningful periods. Yet I can\u2019t help succumbing to the temptation myself. It happens every time I hear about how the 1970s were the last great decade in American film.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">We\u2019re often told that back then, countercultural forces gave us movies of restless auteur ambition like <em>Five Easy Pieces<\/em> and <em>Nashville<\/em> and <em>Mean Streets<\/em> and <em>Shampoo<\/em>. Meanwhile, <em>The Godfather<\/em>, <em>Jaws<\/em>, <em>American Graffiti<\/em>, and even <em>Star Wars<\/em> not only rejuvenated the studio system but also reflected something of their directors\u2019 temperaments, providing Hollywood with an enduring new mythology. So far, so plausible.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Then, the story goes, came the age of the blockbuster. Thereafter, moviemaking was simply selling out, winning the weekend, building franchises, and catering to disposable teenage income. Like big hair and padded shoulders and Wham!, the films of the 1980s are apparently something to be ashamed of.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><strong>The glorious burnout<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/indy-3-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3042\" title=\"indy-3-400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/indy-3-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"173\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/indy-3-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/indy-3-400-150x64.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">This judgment is spelled out most fully in Peter Biskind\u2019s <em>Easy Riders and Raging Bulls<\/em>, a celebration of and postmortem on the Movie Brats era of the 1960s-1970s. Biskind doesn\u2019t try to make a critical case for the films of the period; he assumes that everyone counts these movies as edgy masterpieces. He\u2019s more interested in the sensational lifestyle of the filmmakers. Filling his pages with gossip about alcohol, cocaine, backbiting, squabbles, and the horizontal mambo, he could hardly deny that his favorite directors were somewhat self-destructive. He justifies their escapades by treating them as driven artists fighting a corrupt system\u2014mavericks, in fact. (Yes, he uses the word.) This idealization occasionally leads to mawkishness that Biskind would castigate if he saw it on the screen:<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\" style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>Hal Ashby did die just after Christmas, on a raw, rainy Tuesday. . . .The papers said it was liver and colon cancer, but it could just as well have been a broken heart.<\/strong> (1)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Forgiving the flaws of these all-too-human directors, Biskind spares no sympathy for the producers who focused on the bottom line. With rising budgets and distribution costs, the studios\u2019 cynical leaders chose to play safe with megapictures that purveyed \u201csmarmy, feel-good pap.\u201d (2)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">It\u2019s a good, simple story, and the problem is the simplicity. The top-grossing movies of the 1970s include <em>Love Story<\/em>,<em> Fiddler on the Roof<\/em>,<em> The Sting<\/em>,<em> The Towering Inferno<\/em>,<em> Rocky<\/em>,<em> Grease<\/em>,<em> Smoky and the Bandit<\/em>, and <em>Star Trek: The Motion Picture<\/em>. These aren\u2019t exactly testaments to personal expression. The megapicture mentality we associate with the 1980s was already present in some of these, as well as in <em>The Poseidon Adventure<\/em>, <em>Earthquake<\/em>, and<em> Superman<\/em>. The four-quadrant movie was taking shape well before <em>Heaven\u2019s Gate<\/em> brought auteur ambitions crashing to earth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Further, not every 1980s movie aimed to be a blockbuster. I tried to argue in <em>The Way Hollywood Tells It<\/em> that just as in the classic studio era, we have to look for creativity beyond the titles that dominate the best-10 and top-grosser list. In addition, there are always filmmakers whose sensibilities naturally match the demands of big-budget projects: David Lean and Anthony Mann managed it in the 1960s, Spielberg and Lucas in the 1970s. In the 1980s several directors were able to make strong, original megapictures.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">So you can make a good case that the 1980s gave America a burst of first-rate films and remarkable new talent. At all levels, from ambitious prestige items to dazzling genre pictures, the decade is nothing to be sneezed at. The maw of home video had to be fed, so the demand was for product of all sorts. Videotape rental expanded specialty niches and cult markets. Filmmakers could finance projects through video and foreign presales, and investors took chances at many levels. The era saw a revival of ambitious independent films, which played alongside program pictures, Oscar bait, and summer blockbusters. Romantic comedy, action movies, and science fiction enjoyed a strong run. And many of the people we still consider genuine movie stars\u2014Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, Glenn Close, Harrison Ford, Mel Gibson, and Tom Cruise\u2014are ineluctably creatures of the 80\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">My defense doesn\u2019t spring from generational bias. I don\u2019t have the excuse of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=1484\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">adolescent nostalgia<\/a> that makes Tom Shone write:<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\" style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><strong>What a grand piece of historical luck it was to be in your early teens when <em>Raiders of the Lost Ark<\/em> came out\u2014when Spielberg and Lucas were in their prime and the very act of going to the movies seemed to come with its own brassily rousing John Williams score. Later on, we would learn to cuss and curse the infantilization of the American film industry, just like everyone else, but back then we were too busy infantilizing it to notice.<\/strong> (2)<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">So here are some assorted, more or less objective reasons to consider this decade as making a remarkable contribution to U. S. film history.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><strong>New talents, old genres<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/near-dark-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3038\" title=\"near-dark-400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/near-dark-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"219\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/near-dark-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/near-dark-400-150x82.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><em>Near Dark<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Put aside two highly influential 1980s films, <em>E. T.\u2014The Extraterrestrial<\/em> and <em>Raiders of the Lost Ark<\/em>, since Biskind would consider them feel-good pap. Put aside <em>Raging Bull<\/em>, which he grants canonical status as the capstone masterwork of the 1970s generation. Even granting all this, most major 1970s directors didn\u2019t vanish in the megapicture decade.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Scorsese\u2019s underrated <em>King of Comedy<\/em> was a portrait of a social type, the obstinate, delusional nerd; we all knew one, but we hadn\u2019t seen him on the screen before. Altman moved from <em>Popeye<\/em>, a sort of anti-musical and anti-comic-book movie, to intimate theatre pieces like <em>Streamers<\/em> and <em>Secret Honor<\/em> and <em>Fool for Love<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">From Jonathan Demme we had <em>Melvin and Howard<\/em> and <em>Something Wild<\/em>; from Clint Eastwood, <em>Pale Rider<\/em> and <em>Bird<\/em>; from Paul Schrader, <em>American Gigolo<\/em>, <em>Cat People<\/em>, <em>Mishima<\/em>, and the Bressonian\u00a0<em>Patty Hearst<\/em>. Coppola, supposedly a marked man after <em>Apocalypse Now<\/em>, gave us another anti-musical (<em>One from the Heart<\/em>) and a robust biopic (<em>Tucker: The Man and His Dream<\/em>). De Palma outraged his audience with <em>Dressed to Kill<\/em>, <em>Blow Out<\/em>, and <em>Scarface<\/em>. John Carpenter\u2019s B-movie sensibility was given full throttle in <em>Escape from New York<\/em>, <em>The Thing<\/em>, and <em>Big Trouble in Little China<\/em>. And arguably David Cronenberg hit his stride with <em>Scanners<\/em>,<em> Videodrome<\/em>,<em> The Dead Zone<\/em>,<em> The Fly<\/em>, and <em>Dead Ringers<\/em>. Maybe we should just call the 80\u2019s the Cronenberg Years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Veteran directors also got in their licks. Sidney Lumet had a remarkable run; if you bet on\u00a0<em>Serpico<\/em>, I see you\u00a0<em>The Verdict<\/em> and raise you\u00a0<em>Prince of the City<\/em>. Sergio Leone offered\u00a0<em>Once Upon a Time in America<\/em>, a film that looks more ambitious on each viewing. John Huston checked in with\u00a0<em>Prizzi\u2019s Honor<\/em> and\u00a0<em>The Dead<\/em>, Sam Fuller with\u00a0<em>The Big Red One<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Biskind castigates the 1980s for parvenu producers like Don Simpson and Michael Eisner, but he doesn\u2019t mention all the new directors who emerged. Some allied themselves with independent companies or mini-majors, others worked through the studios,\u00a0but in any case it\u2019s strange to overlook Michael Mann, Oliver Stone, Tim Burton, the Coens, Spike Lee, Robert Zemeckis, James Cameron, George Miller, Barry Levinson, John Sayles, Gus Van Sant, Jim Jarmusch, Katherine Bigelow, David Mamet, Steven Soderbergh, et al. Just cherry-picking their films yields up <em>Thief<\/em>, <em>Manhunter<\/em>, <em>Salvador<\/em>, <em>Platoon<\/em>, <em>Wall Street<\/em>, <em>Born on the Fourth of July<\/em>, <em>Pee-Wee\u2019s Big Adventure<\/em>, <em>Beetlejuice<\/em>, <em>Batman<\/em>, <em>Blood Simple<\/em>, <em>Raising Arizona<\/em>, <em>She\u2019s Gotta Have It<\/em>, <em>School Daze<\/em>, <em>Do The Right Thing<\/em>, <em>Used Cars<\/em>, <em>Diner<\/em>, <em>Tin Men<\/em>, <em>The Abyss<\/em>,\u00a0<em>Return of the Secaucus Seven<\/em>, <em>Matewan<\/em>, <em>Mala Noche<\/em>, <em>Drugstore Cowboy<\/em>, <em>Stranger than Paradise<\/em>, <em>Down by Law<\/em>, <em>Mystery Train<\/em>, <em>Near Dark<\/em>, <em>House of Games<\/em>, <em>Things Change<\/em>,\u00a0<em>sex, lies and videotape<\/em>. Not many dribs of feel-good pap in this bunch.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">There was a lot of bloated Oscar bait, I grant you. Is anybody, anywhere on the globe watching <em>Gandhi<\/em> or <em>Chariots of Fire<\/em> or <em>Driving Miss Daisy<\/em> at the moment? But we had <em>Amadeus<\/em>, an intelligent biopic, as well as <em>Tender Mercies<\/em> and <em>Coal Miner\u2019s Daughter <\/em>and <em>Rain Man<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">The 1980s kept genres firmly at the center of Hollywood. Instead of working against genre conventions, as many Movie Brats had done (not all; remember Bogdanovich), many of the most talented Eighties directors found ways to do what they wanted in and through genres. In this sense, they were more like Hawks and Ford and other classical filmmakers. The &#8220;personal&#8221; mainstream film wasn&#8217;t a contradiction in terms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Take science fiction. <em>Blade Runner<\/em>, which became as influential as <em>Metropolis<\/em> and <em>2001<\/em>, pushed to an extreme the premise of <em>Alien<\/em>: The future will be rusty, drippy, and stygian. <em>Blade Runner<\/em> also expanded teenage vocabularies by at least one word (can you say <em>dystopian<\/em>?). Handed another cult science-fiction story, David Lynch turned <em>Dune<\/em> into a pageant of hallucinatory grotesques. Voices float unbidden in the air, and boils never looked so glistening. Today, these overstuffed genre pieces repay viewing more than <em>Out of Africa<\/em> does.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Granted, the 80s gave us plenty of earnest clunkers in the drama department, perhaps most notably <em>The Color Purple<\/em>. But we also have <em>Body Heat<\/em>,<em> Never Cry Wolf<\/em>,<em> Fatal Attraction<\/em>,<em> Witness<\/em>,<em> Kiss of the Spider Woman<\/em>,<em> The Accused<\/em>,<em> Terms of Endearment<\/em>,<em> The Right Stuff<\/em>,<em> Field of Dreams<\/em>,<em> River\u2019s Edge<\/em>,<em> Places in the Heart, The Big Chill<\/em>, and other sturdy efforts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">If you admire <em>Ishtar<\/em>, then add it to this list. Ditto the parboiled stylings of Alan Parker: <em>Pink Floyd The Wall<\/em>, <em>Birdy<\/em>, <em>Angel Heart<\/em>, and <em>Mississippi Burning<\/em>. And if you grew up on John Hughes movies, there\u2019s no more to be said by me. You probably still love <em>Sixteen Candles<\/em>, <em>The Breakfast Club<\/em>, and the rest. Okay, maybe we should consider it the Hughes decade.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><strong>Laughs and bullets<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gremlins-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3040\" title=\"gremlins-400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gremlins-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gremlins-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/gremlins-400-150x84.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Fantasy comedy flourished in the period, from a masterpiece of dark humor like <em>Beetlejuice<\/em> to amiable fare like <em>Ghostbusters<\/em>, <em>Big<\/em>, <em>Splash<\/em>, and <em>All of Me<\/em>. Add to this list <em>Gremlins, <\/em>sort of the down-and-dirty <em>E. T.<\/em>; I dare you to watch this or the 1990 sequel without laughing. Farce was also on the agenda, with the output of Mel Brooks (<em>Spaceballs<\/em>) and the Zucker-Abrams team (<em>Airplane!<\/em> <em>Top Secret!<\/em>), and one-offs like <em>A Fish Called Wanda<\/em>. <em>Saturday Night Live<\/em> continued to breed new stars. Bill Murray, today an axiom of the independent cinema, made his debut in the period. And after <em>The Adventures of Pluto Nash<\/em> (2002) and <em>Meet Dave<\/em> (2008), it\u2019s heartening to remember Eddie Murphy\u2019s appeal in <em>48 HRS<\/em>, <em>Beverly Hills Cop<\/em>, <em>Trading Places<\/em>, and <em>Coming to America<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">On the romantic comedy front, we had <em>Victor\/ Victoria<\/em>, <em>Mystic Pizza<\/em>, <em>Desperately Seeking Susan<\/em>, <em>B<\/em><em>roadcast News<\/em>, <em>Moonstruck<\/em>, <em>Bull Durham<\/em>, and one of the supreme achievements in the genre, <em>Tootsie<\/em>. I never met anybody who didn\u2019t like <em>Tootsie<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Speaking of romantic comedy, every era has its favorite perky blonde. Long ago it was Doris Day; today it\u2019s Reese Witherspoon. In between came Goldie Hawn, who gave us <em>Private Benjamin<\/em> and, mixing it up with Chevy Chase, two trim comedies <em>Foul Play<\/em> (okay, 1978) and my own favorite, <em>Seems Like Old Times<\/em>, a frothy revival of the screwball tradition. Her mantle was picked up by Meg Ryan in <em>When Harry Met Sally<\/em>, and she continued to deliver pert-and-lovable through the 1990s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Movies centering on kids, like\u00a0<em>WarGames<\/em> and\u00a0<em>The Karate Kid<\/em> and\u00a0<em>Stand by Me,<span style=\"font-style: normal;\"> prove<em><span style=\"font-style: normal;\">d unexpectedly enjoyable to grownups too. <em>Back to the Future<\/em> was an intricate Oedipal fable, coarsened but also complicated in the second installment and sweetened in the third. Coppola\u2019s flirtation with teenage art movies gave us <em>The Outsiders<\/em> and <em>Rumble Fish<\/em>. <em>Fame<\/em> is probably a part of every Gen-Xer\u2019s childhood too, as are other musicals like <em>Flashdance<\/em>, <em>Dirty Dancing<\/em>, <em>Hairspray<\/em>, and the 1989 resurrection of Disney animation, <em>The Little Mermaid<\/em>. <\/span><\/em><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">With the new attractiveness of the global market, the demands of home video, and increasingly sophisticated special effects, the 1980s brought the really violent action movie into its own. I\u2019m not ready to defend <em>Rambo<\/em> and its clones, not even the indifferently directed <em>Lethal Weapon<\/em>. But I will stick up for <em>Fort Apache\u2014The Bronx<\/em>, <em>The Terminator<\/em>, <em>Robocop<\/em>, <em>Aliens<\/em>, <em>Predator<\/em>, and <em>The Untouchables<\/em>, the last of which has given us many lines appropriate to President-elect Obama\u2019s Chicago-based campaign. (\u201cBrings a knife to a gunfight.\u201d \u201cThey send one of yours to the hospital, you send one of theirs to the morgue.\u201d) <em>Road Warrior<\/em> probably counts as an import, but we ought to treat <em>Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome<\/em> as a Hollywood release. This sequel transposes the earlier film\u2019s grimly amusing chases and stunts into full-out slapstick, while giving us one of the most touching finales of any film of its day.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">I save for last the obligatory mention of <em>Die Hard<\/em>, the <em>Jaws<\/em> of the 1980s: a perfectly engineered entertainment.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><strong>Middlebrow, semi-highbrow<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/true-stories-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3041\" title=\"true-stories-400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/true-stories-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/true-stories-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/true-stories-400-150x112.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">I don\u2019t automatically despise middlebrow culture (a subject, I hope, for a future blog). But many cinephiles do, so I\u2019m probably in the minority in my esteem for another prototypical 80s director, Ron Howard. Like Zemeckis, he started his climb with a something a little naughty, the mortuary comedy <em>Night Shift<\/em>. Thereafter he tried to update Hollywood genres in ingeniously middlebrow fashion, from <em>Cocoon<\/em> and <em>Gung Ho<\/em> to <em>Parenthood<\/em>, probably his best film of the decade.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Hollywood films have long blended art-cinema experimentation and genre conventions; it\u2019s what a lot of people found exciting about <em>The Conversation<\/em> and <em>The Godfather Part II<\/em> and the seventies work of Altman. That sort of blending continued in the 1980s. The most obvious examples came from David Lynch, with <em>The Elephant Man<\/em> (surreal visions plus disfigured hero) and <em>Blue Velvet<\/em> (the Hardy Boys meet sadomasochism). Another merger of art movie and genre movie was <em>The Stunt Man<\/em>, a three-card-monte affair about moviemaking. Want a postmodern musical? David Byrne\u2019s <em>True Stories<\/em> treated avant-garde art as of a piece with down-home kitsch. The music track is infectious, with the lip-sync sequence on \u201cWild, Wild Life\u201d capturing the sense that everyone can be famous for, well, not fifteen minutes but about ten seconds.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">I\u2019m venturing onto disputed terrain here, but I vote for Alan Rudolph\u2019s <em>Choose Me<\/em> as an intelligent blend of Euroart neuroticism and off-kilter romantic comedy. The first shot, a long take craning down the side of a bar sign and along a street filled with hustlers sometimes dancing and sometimes not, accompanied by Teddy Pendergrass\u2019s music, remains a tingling moment of bravado. The interruptive flashbacks (or are they visions?) and some tricky pan shots play daringly with character motivations. I also admire <em>Trouble in Mind<\/em> and <em>The Moderns<\/em>, but I realize that making a case for them would probably be pushing my luck.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">When was the last time Woody Allen made a really good movie? Hard to say, but recall three 1980s titles: <em>Hannah and Her Sisters<\/em>, <em>Zelig<\/em>, and <em>Crimes and Misdemeanors<\/em>. They show that Allen could take chances with adventurous narrative strategies, while mixing in mordant dialogue, social satire, surprisingly bitter comedy, and earned pathos. Consider <em>Radio Days<\/em> the cherry on top.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">There are plenty of other worthwhile items:\u00a0<em>My Favorite Year<\/em>, <em>The Dream Team<\/em>, <em>Valley Girl<\/em>,\u00a0<em>Adventures in Babysitting<\/em>, <em>Excalibur<\/em>, <em>Earth Girls Are Easy<\/em>, <em>The Abyss, This Is Spinal Tap, D. C. Cab, The Princess Bride<\/em>, <em>Total Recall<\/em>, <em>Day of the Dead<\/em>, <em>Monkey Shines, Streets of Fire<\/em>, <em>Housekeeping, Purple Rain<\/em>, <em>Koyaanisqatsi<\/em>,\u00a0<em>The Thin Blue Line<\/em>, and on and on. Few are perfect, but most offer genuine pleasures, and some are as imaginative and bold as the canonized films of the 1970s, albeit in different registers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Not every film on my list will convince everybody, but I think there are enough solid achievements to show that the blockbuster era didn\u2019t suffocate creative filmmaking in the U.S. In some cases it enhanced it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">Come to think of it, the American cinema <em>always<\/em> renews itself. Take the 90s. There\u2019s <em>My Cousin Vinny <\/em>and\u00a0. . . .<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">(1) Biskind, <em>Easy Riders and Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock\u2019n\u2019Roll Generation Saved Hollywood<\/em> (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998), 438.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">(2) Biskind, <em>Easy Riders<\/em>, 404.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\">(3) Tom Shone, <em>Blockbuster: How Hollywood Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Summer <\/em>(New York: Free Press, 2004), 11. Shone\u2019s book is the best antidote I\u2019ve found to the overreaching attacks on 1980s cinema. For a dauntingly comprehensive filmography, see Robert A. Nowlan and Gwendolyn Wright Nowlan, <em>The Films of the Eighties <\/em>(Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1991).<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/one-from-500.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-3039\" title=\"one-from-500\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/one-from-500.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"374\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/one-from-500.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/one-from-500-150x112.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/one-from-500-401x300.jpg 401w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormalCxSpMiddle\"><em>One from the Heart<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><!--EndFragment--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Choose Me. DB here: In an earlier post, I proposed that film historians can&#8217;t safely assume that decades mark off meaningful periods. Yet I can\u2019t help succumbing to the temptation myself. It happens every time I hear about how the 1970s were the last great decade in American film. We\u2019re often told that back then, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42,1,12,57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-film-comments","category-film-history","category-hollywood-aesthetic-traditions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3036"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3036\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40767,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3036\/revisions\/40767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}