{"id":2787,"date":"2008-09-06T09:14:32","date_gmt":"2008-09-06T14:14:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=2787"},"modified":"2009-11-15T13:14:07","modified_gmt":"2009-11-15T18:14:07","slug":"is-there-a-blog-in-this-class-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2008\/09\/06\/is-there-a-blog-in-this-class-2008\/","title":{"rendered":"Is there a blog in this class? 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Kristin here\u2014<\/p>\n

One year ago today, I wrote the first \u201cIs There a Blog in This Class?\u201d entry<\/a>. The idea was to point Film Art: An Introduction<\/em> users toward past entries that might prove useful in relation to various topics in the textbook. The beginning of the autumn semester seemed a good time to survey what has been posted here. We plan to make such surveys an annual feature of the blog. [For the 2009 entry, go here<\/a>.]\u00a0 After all, there are over 200 items by now, and that number increases by about one per week. We also use the \u201cFilm Art: The Book\u201d tag<\/a> for entries that we think might be pedagogically useful, so you can always check there for updates.<\/p>\n

From its first appearance in 1979, Film Art<\/em> has offered a large and broad selection of examples illustrated by frame enlargements. Space considerations, however, always limit us to a few images from all but our most important examples. One enormous advantage of the blog is that we can use as many illustrations as we need. Some of the entries listed below can be useful as supplementary examples that go into more precise detail than we can in the textbook.<\/p>\n

Some general entries<\/strong><\/p>\n

DVD supplements can be very useful for teaching, but many of them are lightweight fare, with actors and major crew members talking about how wonderful their colleagues are. Film Art<\/em> suggests some more substantive supplements. More recent recommendations appear in \u201cBeyond praise: DVD supplements that really tell you something.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

These days students are likely to encounter filmmakers talking about their own work, whether on talk shows, in DVD supplements, or in scholarly collections of interviews. In studying films, we need to examine their statements, which sometimes can be misleading. David ponders the question, \u201cDo filmmakers deserve the last word?\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Chapter 1 Film as Art: Creativity, Technology, and Business<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you have aspiring filmmakers in your class, you might want to direct them to David\u2019s \u201cThe magic number 30, give or take 4,\u201d<\/a> on the age at which most directors get started.<\/p>\n

Chapter 2 The Significance of Film Form<\/strong><\/p>\n

During the spring of 2008, there was a lot of talk concerning the supposed decline of film criticism. In response, \u201cIn critical condition\u201d<\/a> elaborates on the four activities laid out in Chapter 2: Description, analysis, interpretation<\/em>, and evaluation<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Chapter 3<\/strong> Narrative as a Formal System<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cA behemoth from the Dead Zone,\u201d<\/a> on the monster movie Cloverfield<\/em>, discusses the concept of restricted narration in detail, touching on other Hollywood examples as well.<\/p>\n

Virtually all the films used in Film Art<\/em> are good examples of whatever technique or formal property we\u2019re discussing. For Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull<\/em>,<\/a> we pick apart the problems with motivation, progression, and character. We end with some comments on Steven Spielberg\u2019s directorial style.<\/p>\n

Two essays on David\u2019s website deal with narrative issues. \u201cThe Hook: Scene Transitions in Classical Cinema\u201d<\/a> examines how classical Hollywood films use small-scale patterns to guide the spectator from one scene to the next. \u201cAnatomy of the Action Film\u201d <\/a>analyzes the plot structure in Mission: Impossible: III<\/em> using a number of concepts discussed in Film Art<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Chapter 4<\/strong> The Shot: Mise-en-Scene<\/strong><\/p>\n

In \u201cHands (and faces) across the table,\u201d<\/a> analyses of three long takes from films made decades apart\u2014Paul Thomas Anderson\u2019s There Will Be Blood<\/em> (2007), Akira Kurosawa\u2019s The Most Beautiful<\/em> (1944), and Cecil B. De Mille\u2019s Kindling <\/em>(1915)\u2014demonstrate the use of staging to subtly direct the viewer\u2019s attention within the frame. This entry could be equally useful in exploring the long take in Chapter 5.<\/p>\n

Chapter 5 The Shot: Cinematography<\/strong><\/p>\n

Aspect ratios may seem a narrow, esoteric subject\u2014especially to students! But \u201cGodard comes in many shapes and sizes\u201d<\/a> uses many pretty pictures to demonstrate just how important framings are and how they can be distorted in DVDs. Students may be less resistant to letter-boxing after reading this.<\/p>\n

Our discussion of 3D technology in Beowulf,<\/em> \u201cBwana Beowulf,\u201d<\/a> also considers film style and how filmmakers so far have failed to find new ways of adjusting classical Hollywood style to 3D. People tend to have strong feelings one way or the other on the introduction of 3D, so this issue would probably generate a lively discussion.<\/p>\n

The “Sleeves”<\/a> entry compares framing techniques in William Wyler’s The Little Foxes<\/em> and Kenji Mizoguchi’s A Woman of Rumor<\/em> (an analysis which could be equally useful in discussing editing).<\/p>\n

Chapter 6 The Relation of Shot to Shot: Editing<\/strong><\/p>\n

While at the Hong Kong Film Festival in April, 2008, David interviewed Johnny To\u2019s editor, Tina Baz, on dealing with the complexities of shifting point-of-view in Mad Detective<\/em>. Unfortunately at this point the film hasn\u2019t been released in the U.S., either theatrically or on DVD; it is, however, available in the U.K.<\/a> The interview<\/a> contains massive spoilers that students shouldn\u2019t encounter before they\u2019ve seen the film. If Mad Detective<\/em> does become available, however, it would be a challenging film to show in a unit on editing. If you\u2019re teaching an upper-level analysis course or an introductory one to film majors, this one will get them talking. It also provides vivid examples of rapid shifts in point of view.<\/p>\n

In \u201cSome cuts I have known and loved,\u201d<\/a> David analyzes brief segments from five films, each centering on a particularly ingenious, striking, or flagrant cut. These are not<\/em> the familiar examples usually summoned to demonstrate editing.<\/p>\n

Chapter 7 Sound in the Cinema<\/strong><\/p>\n

My \u201cWhat does a Water Horse sound like?\u201d<\/a> covers a session of final sound mixing for Walden Films\u2019 The Water Horse<\/em>, with flashbacks to watching sound sessions for The Return of the King<\/em>. David got another insight into the complexities of sound mixing in an interview with Martin Chappell, sound editor of several Johnny To films and Tsui Hark\u2019s Time and Tide<\/em>. He wrote it up as \u201cThe boy in the Black Hole.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Chapter 9 Film Genres<\/strong><\/p>\n

In \u201cYour trash, my treasure,\u201d<\/a> David reflects on the children\u2019s action genre as revived by the National Treasure<\/em> films.<\/p>\n

Chapter 10 Documentary, Experimental, and Animated Films<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cManhattan: Symphony of a great city\u201d <\/a>analyses Amos Poe\u2019s epic, mesmeric Empire II<\/em>, a structural film based on a complex rendering of imagery recorded from a single window. The gorgeous frames will make both you and your students (at least the curious, perceptive ones among them) want to see the film. At three hours, it\u2019s difficult to squeeze into a class screening, but even a generous excerpt would convey something of its fascination.<\/p>\n

\u201cLines of sight and light\u201d<\/a> describes some recent experimental films, including Ken Jacobs\u2019 Capitalism: Child Labor<\/em> (2006).<\/p>\n

In \u201cTracking Aardman creatures,\u201d<\/a> we presented a brief history and chronology of the great Bristol-based animation firm, responsible for Creature Comforts<\/em> and the Wallace and Gromit series. If you\u2019re showing an Aardman film in class, this will give you plenty of information on the company and on DVD availability as of January, 2008.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re showing your students Warner Bros. cartoons, \u201cPausing and chortling: A tribute to Bob Clampett\u201d<\/a> might be useful. It gives some additional information about animation techniques and incidentally points to a teaching technique you might want to use in class.<\/p>\n

Pixar consistently creates some of the best films (not just animated films, but films) coming out of Hollywood. It\u2019s good news that the company is increasing its rate of release. By next spring, WALL-E<\/em>, Bolt<\/em>, and Up<\/em> will have appeared in less than a twelve-month period. We got a fascinating glimpse behind the scenes when Bill Kinder, Director of Editorial and Post-Production, visited Madison. Some of what he said is summarized in \u201cA glimpse into the Pixar kitchen.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Chapter 11 Film Criticism: Critical Analyses<\/strong><\/p>\n

Few of our entries offer in-depth analyses of single films, but \u201cCavalcanti + Ealing = a little-known gem\u201d<\/a> examines the narrative of Went the Day Well?<\/em> and puts it into historical context. \u201cCronenberg\u2019s Violent Reversals\u201d<\/a> compares the narrative structures of A History of Violence<\/em> and Eastern Promises,<\/em> while \u201cThree Nights of a Dreamer\u201d<\/a> goes shot by shot through a sequence from In the City of Sylvia<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Chapter 12 Film Art and Film History<\/strong><\/p>\n

Film Art<\/em>\u2019s final chapter includes a section \u201cThe Development of the Classical Hollywood Cinema (1908-1927),\u201d which outlines the early formulation of continuity editing. In \u201cHappy birthday, classical cinema!,\u201d<\/a> posted December 28, 2007, we celebrating the 90th<\/sup> anniversary of the crucial year, 1917, when classical editing patterns crystallized into a system that has endured, with variations, ever since. We discuss some of the subtleties of the continuity guidelines of the time, with plenty of examples.<\/p>\n

A related entry, \u201cRio Jim, in discrete fragments,\u201d<\/a> examines shifts in technique during the development of continuity editing, concentrating on several William S. Hart westerns of the mid-1910s. Another entry, \u201cLucky \u201813,\u201d<\/a> discusses the transitional year 1913 through two masterpieces that represent quite different styles.<\/p>\n

\u201cAll singing! All dancing! All teaching!\u201d<\/a> is aimed primarily at teachers using Film History: An Introduction<\/em>, who would be likely to devote a lecture and screening to the subject. Still, Film Art<\/em> users might find it useful, either in relation to Chapter 9 or for the brief section on the coming of sound in Chapter 12. It assesses several documentaries on the coming of sound that had recently come out on DVD. Even for those who don\u2019t want to show them in class, they yield considerable information. (One of the DVDs also deals with color technology up to the introduction of three-strip Technicolor in the 1930s.)<\/p>\n

\u201cSuperheroes for sale\u201d <\/a>deals with recent trends in the American film industry.<\/p>\n

Other entries<\/strong><\/p>\n

Although most of our entries could be read by an undergraduate, we don\u2019t make a point of writing them for students. \u201cObservations on Film Art and film art\u201d has a wide readership, including other cinephiles, journalists, industry people, bloggers, filmmakers, and scholars in the other arts. A few of our entries go beyond the level of an introductory class. If you teach graduate students or have bright and enthusiastic undergraduates looking to learn more, you might, for example, steer them to this item: \u201cMinding movies,\u201d <\/a>a brief summary of cognitive film theory, with lots of links for those who want to go further in this direction.<\/p>\n

When we go to film festivals, we post reports on the movies we see, the old friends we re-connect with, and the new ones we meet. On a regular basis, we visit the Hong Kong, Vancouver, and Wisconsin festivals, as well as Roger Ebert\u2019s \u201cEbertfest.\u201d These entries are chatty and sometimes specific to films that students may never get a chance to see. They would be difficult to link up with Film Art<\/em>. Still, they give a sense of one major aspect of film culture and show part what their textbook authors do when they\u2019re not preparing new editions. We haven\u2019t listed those entries here, but you can find them by clicking here<\/a> or on the Festivals category on the blog. If you\u2019re interested in a particular film or filmmaker, try a search. Perhaps we\u2019ve said something on the subject.<\/p>\n

When we launched \u201cObservations on Film Art and film art,\u201d we tended to post every few days. This year we have tried to settle into a steady, once-a-week rhythm, with new entries typically going online between Thursday and Saturday. For those teachers who might want to assign their students to read the blog regularly, we hope this schedule makes that easier.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kristin here\u2014 One year ago today, I wrote the first \u201cIs There a Blog in This Class?\u201d entry. The idea was to point Film Art: An Introduction users toward past entries that might prove useful in relation to various topics in the textbook. The beginning of the autumn semester seemed a good time to survey […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film-art"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2787"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2787\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6117,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2787\/revisions\/6117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}