{"id":24553,"date":"2013-09-23T07:51:17","date_gmt":"2013-09-23T12:51:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=24553"},"modified":"2018-03-25T14:59:36","modified_gmt":"2018-03-25T19:59:36","slug":"the-grandmaster-moving-forward-turning-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2013\/09\/23\/the-grandmaster-moving-forward-turning-back\/","title":{"rendered":"THE GRANDMASTER: Moving forward, turning back"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

DB here:<\/p>\n

The summer has brought us two major films by the two leading Hong Kong directors. I\u2019ve discussed Johnnie To\u2019s fine Drug War<\/em> earlier<\/a>. Now it\u2019s time for some ideas about The Grandmaster<\/em>. Wong Kar-wai’s film displays, in fairly straightforward ways, some of his typical artistic and commercial strategies. Here he adapts his characteristic approach to style and form to a classic genre\u2014and to the demands of the marketplace.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

On kung-fu considered as one of the fine arts<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Wing Chun is the best-known and most influential Chinese martial art in the world. It owes its renown to two women and two men. In the 1700s the Buddhist nun Ng Mui developed a style called Plum Flower Fist, and a young woman named Yim Wing Chun adapted it into something requiring less strength. Bruce Lee trained in the style, revised it according to his interests, and popularized it in films that reached millions of viewers. Lee\u2019s teacher was Ip Man, a master who settled in Hong Kong after World War II and set up a school. Ip made public a Southern fighting technique that had previously been shared among families and friends.<\/p>\n

As both a mainlander and a Hong Konger, Ip is a good symbol of the union of two Chinas. Given the stunning rise of China\u2019s economic and cultural power since the 1980s, it\u2019s not surprising that someone would come up with the idea of a film about him.<\/p>\n

Wong Kar-wai claims to have had that idea in the late 1990s. In 2002, he announced that a film about Ip was on his agenda. After finishing 2046<\/em> (2004) and an episode for the portmanteau film Eros<\/em> (2004), he seemed to move forward, slating Tony Leung Chiu-wai as the star and bringing Ip\u2019s family aboard as consultants. But other activities intervened, notably an ill-fated three-picture deal with Fox Searchlight. Wong continued to occupy himself with his other businesses, including his lucrative talent-management firm and his advertising unit, which made commercials for Dior, Lacoste, Motorola, and other companies. He also directed My Blueberry Nights<\/em> (2007) and recast Ashes of Time<\/em> (1994) as Ashes of Time Redux<\/em> (2008).<\/p>\n

In 2009 he got to work on the Ip Man film, eventually bringing in funding from many sources, including mainland Chinese companies, Fortissimo, The Weinstein Company, and Annapurna Pictures. Scheduled for a premiere in late 2010, then late 2012, it didn\u2019t appear until January of 2013. It seems that he was still doing postproduction in Thailand hours before its first press screening in Beijing.<\/p>\n

During the ten years that The Grandmaster<\/em> took to reach the screen, other filmmakers had seized on the great man\u2019s life. Two popular Donnie Yen vehicles, Ip Man<\/em> (2008) and Ip Man 2<\/em> (2010), were followed by a prequel The Legend Is Born: Ip Man<\/em> (2010), and this year, after Wong\u2019s film was released, Ip Man: The Final Fight<\/em>.<\/p>\n

However much Wong fiddles with his movies, in this case he kept the title fixed: Yi Dai Zong Shi<\/em>. It literally means \u201cThe Grandmaster of That Era,\u201d or\u2014since Chinese doesn\u2019t mark plurals in the noun\u2014\u201cThe Grandmasters of That Era.\u201d It\u2019s significant that in early publicity, the project was known as The Grandmasters<\/em>. Wong says his son talked him out of that title. Now, in non-Chinese-speaking countries, it\u2019s The Grandmaster<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The ambiguity about the title takes on special relevance because we have several Grandmaster<\/em>s. After the Beijing premiere, The Grandmaster<\/em> was released throughout China and in Hong Kong. It did good business, earning over US $47 million in those territories. Wong made a shorter version for the European market, and that was apparently the one premiered at the Berlin Film Festival in February. A still shorter version was prepared for the U.S., with The Weinstein Company as distributor. It opened in August, to mostly good reviews, and it has currently reaped about $6 million at the American box office. So far, the film\u2019s worldwide gross is nearly $63 million, making it by far Wong\u2019s most commercially successful theatrical release.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Will the real Grandmaster<\/em> please\u2026?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The three versions tell variants of a core story that starts in southern China in the 1930s. A curtain-raiser shows Ip defeating a rambunctious gang who attack him in a downpour. Although the scene\u2019s place in the plot seems not to be specified, in part it serves as a flamboyant demonstration of Wing Chun\u2019s ability to defeat the powerful leg-fighting techniques characteristic of Northern styles. We then get a prologue in which Ip, the son of a wealthy family, recounts his lifelong dedication to kung-fu. Comfortable with his wife and children in Foshan, he says that he lives in an eternal spring, harking back to the meaning of the name Wing Chun (\u201ccelebrate springtime in song and poetry\u201d).<\/p>\n

A Northeastern master, Gong Yutian, comes to Foshan looking for a major bout with a talented newcomer before he retires. Ip is picked to fight him, and after some testing by local experts who practice Gong\u2019s signature styles, the match takes place. It\u2019s a waltzing, sidling encounter that Ip wins through nuance, not brute force. Gong retires gracefully, but his daughter Gong Er considers her father disgraced and demands a match with Ip. She applies her father\u2019s tough Bagua technique, with its dazzling handwork and spinning evasions, and defeats Ip. In the course of the match, he becomes fascinated with her. When Japan takes over China in 1937, their rematch is postponed, and they pursue their lives separately for several years.<\/p>\n

Ip struggles to survive. He refuses to collaborate with the occupiers and feeds his family on what he can scrounge. Gong Er\u2019s problem revolves around the renegade disciple Ma San, who kills her father in a duel and takes over the school and compound. Ip\u2019s two daughters die, and after the war he migrates to Hong Kong, hoping his wife can join him. But after the Chinese revolution, the border is sealed and he never sees his wife again. Gong Er also winds up in Hong Kong; she managed to reclaim her father\u2019s estate by defeating Ma San, but she has vowed never to marry or to teach kung-fu. She has become a doctor instead. When Ip meets her again, she is already in poor health, partly because of the fight with Ma, but also because of her opium addiction.<\/p>\n

Other characters wind their way through the story, most notably Gong Yutian\u2019s brother and Razor, a partisan during the Japanese occupation who quits the Kuomintang to become a barber in Hong Kong. By the end, Ip is the last of the era. As Gong passed the torch of martial arts to him, so he will pass it to many others. Apparently a passive character, especially compared with Gong Er, Ip illustrates the \u201chorizontal\/vertical\u201d maxim he starts with: \u201cStay standing and you win.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Without counting the credit sequences, the three versions have running times as follows: 124:26 for the China\/Hong Kong release; 114:24 for the European release; and 100:52 for the U.S. release. Some American critics have objected to the third version\u2019s radical compression, and indeed much of interest has been lost.\u00a0Yet many of the changes we encounter in the U. S. version were already present in the European one. To complicate matters, versions two and three aren\u2019t simple cutdowns of the long one. Some shots and sequences are rearranged, and both the second and third versions contain footage, indeed entire scenes, not present in the \u201coriginal.\u201d<\/p>\n

In other words, the usual Wong drill. He is famous for showing up at a film festival just in time, the print moist from the lab, and then recutting it after its premiere. Sometimes the changes result from external pressures: the international cut of Ashes of Time<\/em> begins and ends with staggering fight scenes added at the behest of its Taiwanese producers. But often Wong tinkers with his footage on his own. He trimmed 2046<\/em> by fifteen minutes after its Cannes bow. There are at least two versions of Chungking Express<\/em>, and at least three of My Blueberry Nights<\/em>. There are two versions of Days of Being Wild<\/em>, one with a game-changing prologue. (I talk about that here<\/a>.) And of course Wong redid Ashes of Time<\/em> fourteen years after its initial appearance. (I consider the results here<\/a>.) At one point he talked about issuing a vast DVD set including all the variants of all his films. The constant fiddling that drives him to make his films in postproduction doesn\u2019t end with the premiere.<\/p>\n

So I think we ought not to assume without more evidence that Wong was forced to change what was a definitive version. For him, I think, a film may never assume a final shape. This is the man who considered putting all the footage shot for Happy Together<\/em> on the Internet for fans to cut together however they liked. It may have been a publicity ploy or a passing fancy, but the very fact he voiced it suggests an openness to endless revision.<\/p>\n

According to a valuable piece by Justin Chang in Variety<\/em><\/a>, Wong worked with Harvey Weinstein on both the European and the American versions. I don’t know the full story of this collaboration. But if Weinstein insisted on a still shorter version for America, Wong\u2019s simplest course would have been to take the European cut and pare it down, adding even more expository titles to plug the gaps. The fact that he rearranged footage and added new material suggests that he took the new constraints as something of a challenge. He once suggested<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Why does Godard come up with the jump cut? He made the films too long, so he had to take out some of the shots randomly. So you have to be flexible. And sometimes those restrictions become your source of inspiration.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Told to make a movie shorter, Wong seems to seize the excuse to rework his footage one more time\u2014to create reorderings, connections, and emphases that bring out different facets of the material. “Instead of doing a short version,” Wong has claimed<\/a>.\u00a0“I wanted to do a new version. I wanted to tell the story in a different way.”<\/p>\n

Not incidentally, coming of age as a director in the era of home video, Wong is also aware of some commercial benefits. There are plenty of people who will happily buy all three cuts of The Grandmaster<\/em> on disc. They\u2019ll enjoy picking out different scenes and juxtapositions while still hoping for a full cut in the years to come. A part of Wong\u2019s fanbase has come to expect, and enjoy, his makeovers.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A Chinese kaleidoscope<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Wong doesn\u2019t finalize a script, overshoots vastly, and may return for more footage years after the crew and cast thought the scene was done. Once he gets a new idea he can scrap months of expensive work. A big set built for the future world of 2046<\/em> went unused. \u201cThank God,\u201d sighs his former DP Christopher Doyle, \u201cthere is no one else in the world who works this way.\u201d<\/p>\n

All these tactics give him great flexibility in creating different versions, and so does his characteristic style. Wong\u2019s techniques and his stories facilitate fleshing out parts, snipping out other parts, and recombining still others. This sort of reworking can\u2019t be done so freely when narratives are more linear and the visuals and sounds are more tightly tied to the action. Since Wong makes his movies out of pieces that can be recombined in many ways, each film is like a kaleidoscope. Shake it, and the pieces reconfigure.<\/p>\n

At the level of the action, he can achieve this fluency through flashbacks and, in particular, his strategy of multiple-protagonist plots. Most filmmakers are content to focus on one central character, or possibly two, such as a romantic couple or a pair of police investigators. Other characters are definitely subsidiary, and they get identified in relation to the causal actions driving our prime movers.<\/p>\n

As Tears Go By<\/em>, Wong\u2019s first film, centers on one protagonist, while Happy Together<\/em> concentrates on a couple.\u00a0Other Wong films, though, exhibit more complicated narrative maneuvers. In the Mood for Love<\/em> takes the familiar form of two romantic triangles (as in Lubitsch\u2019s The Marriage Circle<\/em>). The husband of one couple is having an affair with the wife of the other. The innovation is that we almost never see their liaisons; in fact, we don\u2019t see either of the adulterous spouses directly. The plot\u2019s focus is entirely on the two wronged partners, who fall in love with each other. This is a good example of how restricted narration can reshape our sense of plot structure.<\/p>\n

Sometimes we have parallel protagonists: two characters who aren\u2019t embarked on the same enterprise (they may not even know each other) but who claim our interest equally. In Chungking Express<\/em>, each of two policemen has broken up with one girlfriend and is in the process, vaguely, of finding a new one. Here Wong\u2019s bold stroke is to avoid interweaving the two men\u2019s stories. Instead, he simply spliced the end of one cop\u2019s story to the beginning of the next, with a shared space, the Midnight Express fast-food joint, linking the two. Something similar happens in 2046<\/em>, in which one protagonist is a novelist and the other dwells inside the writer\u2019s fiction.<\/p>\n

More drastic is the strategy of creating a central character as a point of intersection of other fates. Days of Being Wild<\/em> puts the pouting, selfish Yuddy at its center, and other characters are his friends, relatives, and lovers. But Wong goes on to create significant plots around those characters too, giving us a sort of network narrative. The policeman Tide, for instance, is pulled into the action by meeting Li-Zhen, after she has been discarded by Yuddy. Tide will, by coincidence, eventually meet Yuddy in the Philippines. Even further away is the mysterious man played by Tony Leung Chiu-wai, who appears in an epilogue grooming himself to go out. This last-minute walk-on of a character with no apparent connection to the action remains a daring innovation. But one version of the film sets up a prologue in which the man is seen starting to dress up while his voice-over reflects on a man he knew\u2014presumably Yuddy.<\/p>\n

In similar fashion, the bounty-hunter agent Ouyang Feng in Ashes of Time<\/em> is at the center of a web of relationships. His friend Huang Yaoshi not only courts the woman Ouyang yearns for but also tries to seduce Peach Blossom, the wife of a blind swordsman who comes to Ouyang looking for work. A brother and sister, named Yin and Yang and played by the same actress, complicate the plot still further. Like Yuddy in Days of Being Wild<\/em>, Ouyang Feng connects several characters and becomes for the most part the central consciousness of the film\u2014the first among equals, we might say.<\/p>\n

These patterns are, famously, not scripted in detail. They emerge from Wong carving into masses of footage and building his plots in postproduction. But this can lead to brutal surgery. An entire plotline involving pop diva Shirley Kwan was cut from Happy Together<\/em>, and Maggie Cheung was startled to discover she barely appeared in 2046<\/em>.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s some evidence that The Grandmaster<\/em> was once planned to be something of a multiple-protagonist film, with Ip Man serving as the point of intersection in the manner of Yuddy and Ouyang Feng. Part of that evidence is internal to the film, chiefly involving the brusque introduction and departure of Razor in all versions. In addition, Wong has talked in an interview<\/a> about modeling the four-hour version of his film on a traditional Chinese novel format, the zhanghui xiaoshuo<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n

What appeals to Wong in this \u201cchaptered novel\u201d genre is that it offers a set of linked, fairly developed stories concentrating first on one character, then on another. Major characters in one section could reappear as minor ones later.<\/p>\n

A novel like this never follows any particular character. A main character in one chapter may just hurry away in another chapter. The author will continue by telling another story. I think that this structure is unique to the Chinese novel. Such is life. Suppose you meet a very good friend. Next time you meet him, he has moved to Chengdu. And five years later you meet him again. That\u2019s the structure of the four-hour version.<\/strong><\/p>\n

However, this structure is too free for contemporary audiences to follow. Therefore, in the two-hour version, I chose to tell the story in a chronological way, from 1936 to the end of the story.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We have to remember that in interviews, Wong often tries to tie his films to the traditions of the culture he\u2019s addressing. In the west he called his films with Chris Doyle \u201cjam sessions,\u201d and he compares their structure to the novels of Puig and Garcia Marquez. This isn\u2019t bad faith, I think; it\u2019s just that Wong is looking everywhere for analogies to the sort of decentered organization he favors. And his evocation of traditional novels like The Water Margin<\/em> (ca. 1368) does capture some of the centrifugal organization of Days<\/em> and Ashes<\/em>.<\/p>\n

In any case, it seems likely that that what was once called The Grandmasters<\/em> might have become a panoramic survey in the manner Wong indicates, with Ip Man as a connecting thread. In the course of filming he doubtless expanded the roles of figures who became marginal. Perhaps the 130-minute version was already something of a compromise with this more sprawling structure.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Splits and mergers<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Wong has carved somewhat different films out of his mass of material. For one thing, he has shifted some big blocks.<\/p>\n

The Chinese and European versions of The Grandmaster<\/em> follow Ip Man\u2019s life up through the Japanese invasion. Then the plot follows Gong Er for about twenty minutes. On a train, she helps the wounded Razor (our first sight of him) as he avoids the Japanese. After the collaborator Ma kills her father, he installs himself in the household and blocks Gong Er from her rightful place. She consults with her father\u2019s disciples and confronts Ma in the compound. There she warns him that she will take back the Gong legacy. She slips off her engagement ring and returns it to her fianc\u00e9. In a temple, where she seeks out permission from her father\u2019s spirit, she vows chastity. She snips off a strand of hair, burns it in a candle flame, and encloses the ashes in a box. (In the European version, we see her cut it; in the Hong Kong version, we simply see her close the box, while a late flashback shows her cutting the hair.) At that point we leave Gong Er\u2019s storyline unfinished. We move to 1950 Hong Kong, where Ip starts to establish himself as a teacher.<\/p>\n

Only after we have followed Ip\u2019s Hong Kong stay for some time do we learn the outcome of Gong Er\u2019s struggle with Ma San. In a flashback apparently prompted by her encounter with Ip, we see her climactic meeting with Ma at the railway terminal in 1940. In that duel, she defeats him and takes back the Gong school, at the cost of serious injuries. Somewhat later we have Ip\u2019s reflection that in Hong Kong Gong Er stopped seeing her patients and started smoking opium. Their final meeting takes place in a teahouse, followed by her drugged reverie recalling her happiest days, training in the snowy north. After their last encounter, a servant brings Ip the box bearing the ashes of her hair.<\/p>\n

In these two versions Wong has followed the idea of chopping up his tale novelistically. Gong Er\u2019s wartime experiences are split into two parts, creating some suspense through the middle portion of the film: Will she reclaim her legacy, and what made her come to Hong Kong? Moreover, the Chinese and European versions don\u2019t give us a smooth pairing-up of Ip and Gong Er. Their meetings are broken up by other pieces of action. After Ip visits her, but before her flashback, we get a scene of Ip meeting Master Gong\u2019s brother reminiscing about their lost world and the dark side of the kung-fu tradition. \u201cForget 64 Hands,\u201d he warns Ip. Then, without any lead-in, we get Gong Er\u2019s flashback to the fight with Ma. After that, instead of moving directly back to Ip\u2019s story, we get a 1952 scene showing Razor in his barbershop thrashing a man seeking money for his mother\u2019s funeral.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

He\u2019s so impressive that the victim wants to be his disciple, and Ip\u2019s voice-over tells us that Razor founded his own school, bringing Baji boxing to Hong Kong. Only then do we return to Ip\u2019s report on Gong Er\u2019s decline.<\/p>\n

A cynic would argue that some of these comparatively unrelated sequences had to be retained because Razor, played by Chang Chen, is a significant Taiwanese star and cutting him out would be bad for business. But we know from the U. S. version that Wong did have footage bringing Razor more firmly into Ip’s line of action. So Wong has kept to his model of digressive interruptions, wedging these \u201cchapters\u201d in among larger story arcs.<\/p>\n

For the American version, Wong has ironed out some of the bumps. In that cut, we are with Ip Man from the start and mostly throughout. After the confrontation in the Gold Pavilion brothel and the exchange of letters, the narration doesn\u2019t adhere to Gong Er until Ip meets her again in Hong Kong. In a longer version of their encounter, after he leaves her apartment she drifts onto the roof, musing in voice-over, \u201cMr. Ip, it was ten years ago\u2026.\u201d Then we get in one long chunk Ma San\u2019s takeover of the household and her eventual victory over him. The scene of Er\u2019s meeting Razor on the train is gone, as is his barbershop fight in Hong Kong. Overall, the scenes bearing on the Ip\/Gong Er phantom romance are joined in a smooth flow that ends with a version of her opium reverie. It\u2019s as if Wong thinks that Americans want a more continuous plot than the zhanghui<\/em> form provides.<\/p>\n

Before we condemn this as dumbing down, we should consider that Wong has done something like it before. The embedded stories of Ashes of Time<\/em> are treated as lengthy, mostly uninterrupted blocks centered on this or that character, flashbacks included. In several of his films, Wong follows a Hong Kong industry practice of organizing the overall plot reel by reel, with one or two reels devoted to each character\u2019s embedded story. The effect of gathering the Hong Kong kung-fu scenes in one batch and the romance scenes in another keeps the focus on Ip. Even when Gong Er\u2019s voice-over introduces the flashback his voice-over takes over after the end. Did she tell him this tale that we overhear as an inner monologue, or did he know by lovers\u2019 telepathy?<\/p>\n

In all, the U.S. version keeps the focus firmly on Ip, while building the film toward revelation of the love he might have shared with Gong Er. Here we get a line that comes at the start of the Chinese and European version:<\/p>\n

I lived through dynastic times, the early republic, warlords, Japanese invasion, and civil war. Finally I came to Hong Kong. What kept me going was the martial arts code of honor.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Arriving at the end of the film, the line takes on a summarizing resonance. It places the episodes we\u2019ve seen in that larger view Ip urges others to take. It comes as a lesson learned rather than a given truth that the film will illustrate.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A martial arts mosaic<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s another analogy. At the level of style, Wong is assembling each film out of bits that can be reconfigured on another occasion. Looked at shot by shot, The Grandmaster <\/em>becomes a sort of mosaic.<\/p>\n

By now everyone is familiar with Wong\u2019s late decorative look: out-of-focus foregrounds partially blocking the action, trembling reflections in mirrors and water, wisps and curls of smoke, luxuriant costumes and sets, ripe chiaroscuro lighting. After experimenting with casual handheld shooting in Chungking Express<\/em> and grotesque wide angles in Fallen Angels<\/em>, he settled on something more traditionally sumptuous in Happy Together<\/em> and subsequent films.<\/p>\n

He could be our von Sternberg, were it not for his nervous pace, his habit of teasingly chopping off his pretty shots. Despite his mood-drenched frames, he betrays almost no interest in staging conversations in complex ways. Wong is, in sum, a very cutting-centered director.<\/p>\n

The Grandmaster<\/em> is virtually a textbook in constructive editing<\/a>. Many scenes simply omit establishing shots and give us a volley of close-ups of characters speaking or looking from fixed positions.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The Golden Pavilion brothel is a warren of windows, which lets various characters peer out at the action from undefined areas. In the Hong Kong version, after Ip has defeated Master Gong, he looks to frame right. Cut to Gong Er, who has been watching the match from some unspecified point. She bolts out frame right, and then we cut to Jiang, her guardian. Initially he seems to be watching Ip, but he seems then to see Er leave, because he turns right to rush out. Then we cut back to Ip, who apparently follows their progression by shifting his glance.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

At no point do we get shots that include all these characters, or even two of them, in the same frame.<\/p>\n

Not only do we get lots of close-ups, but they\u2019re frequently filmed from a slightly high angle. This gives the style a consistency across scenes; the fragmentation might be more jarring if people were shot from many different angles.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The intimate high-angle is given special poignancy when we see Gong Er upside down, drifting in her opium reverie and gradually covered by a dissolve to the snowy Northeast country of her childhood.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

When we do get establishing shots, they are few and not always consistent, as in the scenes taking place in the Golden Pavilion brothel. Here scenes melt into one another, with little demarcation of separate points of time and often little sense that the fights are taking place in front of witnesses. Longer shots are so rare that Wong can save their impact for frozen tableaux, as in the ceremonial moments when Ip faces Master Gong (below) and, as a parallel, Gong Er (at top). And even these aren’t really establishing the place of all the onlookers.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Sometimes the establishing shots don’t establish. You have to look quick to see the “master” framing below as telling us much about the confrontation of Jiang and Gong Er after she has fled from her father’s bout with Ip.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Wong\u2019s cutting pace has picked up as well. In the Mood for Love<\/em> has fewer than 500 shots, but 2046<\/em> has nearly 900 and the U.S. theatrical cut of My Blueberry Nights<\/em> has over 1200. The Grandmaster<\/em> goes far beyond its predecessors, offering over 2500 shots in the long version and about 2000 in the U.S. release. This puts his average shot length into the 3-4 second range. Lest we think that the speedup is due to the action sequences, the swordplay-filled Ashes of Time Redux<\/em> contains only about 850 shots.<\/p>\n

The fragmentation of Wong\u2019s visual style partly reflects his production methods. Complicated camera movements and ensemble staging would demand that he prepare scenes in detail and work out the staging. But the actors never see a script and don\u2019t rehearse. Better, Wong evidently thinks, to position actors standing or sitting, grab lots of shots, and fit it all together after you\u2019ve figured out a story line.<\/p>\n

Given this approach, the transition between one shot and another doesn\u2019t have to be very precise. Instead of \u201ccontinuity\u201d between shots, many Wong scenes have what you might call concealed discontinuity. He will cut from a momentarily blocked image (as the camera coasts around the set) to another part of the scene. He will insert a prop, or a shot that tilts up from an actor\u2019s waist or hips. Snippets of shots can be dropped into a scene, and even if their exact story position is uncertain, we get the point on the fly. We become used to laconic storytelling: little scene-setting, brief sequences, and ellipses within the scenes.<\/p>\n

Once scenes feature many skipped-over actions, Wong doesn\u2019t need to shoot linking shots. To put it in fancy terms, we come to accept elliptical cutting as an intrinsic norm, not just between scenes but within them. It would be hard to tell if something is missing\u2014especially if the soundtrack creates some cohesion. You can always use voice-over or music to stitch together a fairly disjointed stretch of shots.<\/p>\n

More weirdly, a cutaway that is used in one scene can be recycled in a later one in the same set. For example, the old master Rui who tests Ip’s ability to handle Xangyi technique is seen peering through a window in the brothel when Ip confronts Master Gong. A very similar shot, though with different lighting, appears when he watches the revenge match between Ip and Gong Er.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The effect isn\u2019t unlike that in some Soviet silent films, in which shots seen earlier are recruited for fresh duties in a new scene.<\/p>\n

Again, an intrinsic norm kicks in, and we take pretty much what we\u2019re given. For the same reason, I think, Wong doesn\u2019t give us many over-the-shoulder shots, as they specify spatial relations a little more than he wants. Likewise, his decentered close-ups, which don’t let an actor’s glance fill the empty area of the frame, may enhance our sense of a loosely defined story space. Wong had experimented with this in his earlier films, but the wider anamorphic ratio of 2046<\/em> and My Blueberry Nights<\/em>\u00a0(below) seems to have made it more attractive to him. I think that the absence of master shots makes this off-balance framing especially prominent in The Grandmaster<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

This mosaic patterning gives Wong\u2019s films a distinctive texture, and it provides storytelling advantages. The laconic cutting can permit crisp, rapid narration; no need to waste time with establishing shots and images of people entering or leaving buildings. Scenes can be astonishingly short. Even in the \u201cfull\u201d version of The Grandmaster<\/em>, many scenes last less than a minute. At the same time, the fragmentation leads naturally to the lyrical music montages that Wong is fond of. A moment can be expanded through a string of shots, enhanced by slow motion or ramping.<\/p>\n

What gives Wong flexibility in assembly also permits him to build different versions for different markets. Because every shot can be connected to others in a variety of ways, he has plenty of leeway for trimming or adding, throwing shots out or adding some in. This is indeed what we find in the various versions, where some scenes are reduced in their duration and others are extended. For example, in the U. S. version, Gong Er\u2019s recollection of her challenge to Ma is introduced with several shots of her drifting across her apartment and onto the building\u2019s flat rooftop. These aren\u2019t in the other versions, but they are easy to add to a scene that already contains fairly vague spatial continuity. In all, Wong\u2019s patchwork coverage of scenes gives him more freedom in reworking the film than conventional continuity would.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Those who can, teach<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I argue in Planet Hong Kong<\/em> that despite his references to intellectual topics, Wong is a filmmaker rooted in popular culture. He exploits star images, pop songs, and especially Hong Kong movie genres. He has appropriated the romantic comedy, the crime movie, the tragic-Triad gangster saga, the swordplay film, and above all the melodrama. Of course he revises the conventions he seizes upon, but his crossover inclinations make his films enjoyable to people who wouldn\u2019t sit through Antonioni or Tarr. This is no less true of The Grandmaster<\/em>, at once kung-fu movie, historical biopic, and muted love triangle.<\/p>\n

Wong eagerly embraces the staples of the martial arts picture. The variations of speed, from slow-motion to ramping and jittery movement, were there in his earlier work, but now they join the great tradition of kinetic action. The variety of angles, the dust billowing when someone is whacked, the rapid track-ins to poised combat stances, the magnified whooshes and smacks, the fighters hurled through windows, the kicks that bash brick walls and loosen iron bolts, the fights in rain and snow recalling Kurosawa\u2014we\u2019ve been here before.<\/p>\n

Admittedly, Wong rubs his characteristic gloss into the visuals. Classic kung-fu films of the 1970s were fast-cut, but they usually featured long shots from many angles, with occasional cut-ins to close views to accentuate certain moments. 1980s directors like Yuen Kwai broke down the action still further, but the inserts of hands, faces, feet, and props were instantly legible and spatially continuous. These fast shots disassembled the fight into crisp details. (Examples are here<\/a> and here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

In The Grandmaster<\/em>, Wong steers a course between precise articulation of certain moments and a loose, sketchy piling up of gestures. Shallow-focus close-ups of hammering fists and pivoting bodies offer a fusillade of sensuous appeals. Some passages have a nearly abstract flow, but impressionistic blurs and smears are halted with a snap by a highly readable establishing shot, abrupt moments of stasis, or hypersharp slowed motion. To scrutinize the film\u2019s distinctive style properly, we\u2019d have to work with a 35mm print (the gauge in which most of it was shot) and go frame by frame<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Despite the polished surface, Wong\u2019s core drama respects basic conventions. The plot rests upon the rivalry among schools, the demand to synthesize and reconcile warring combat styles, the calmness of true masters versus the heedless arrogance of street fighters, and the secret techniques that settle a fight. In the moment that Master Wong throws out Ma San as a renegade, his use of his supreme move, \u201cThe Old Monkey Hangs Up His Badge,\u201d is barely glimpsed in the film’s most impressionistic fight. The power of this family legacy is reaffirmed when Gong Er applies it to win the fight with Ma San at the railway station.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

As in classic kung-fu movies, combats are characterizing. The crushing-fist technique of Xingyi deployed by Ma San fits his personality, while Gong Er employs the graceful but deadly Bagua (usually transliterated as Pa Kua). Their styles encapsulate the two sides of old Gong\u2019s legacy, for he was able to merge the two styles (as indeed they were merged by many practitioners). Wing Chun, by contrast, is chiefly a self-defense school. It favors deflecting an onslaught of blows with palm, fist, leg, and forearm movements that are also attacks; the fighter keeps blocking until a space opens up for a decisive punch or kick. The simplicity, resourcefulness, and modesty of Wing Chun defines Ip as a man.<\/p>\n

More broadly, the combats contrast the sadistic fury of Ma San and Razor with the relaxed confidence of old Gong and Ip. The first two grandmasters are arrogant bullies, while Gong and Ip maintain the tradition of kung-fu as a repository of decency, dignity, and wisdom.<\/p>\n

Gong Er is caught in the middle. She is from the start characterized as willful (part of Zhang Ziyi\u2019s star persona since Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon<\/em>) and too conscious of the martial-arts hierarchy. Old Gong considers Ip\u2019s victory over him an inevitable passing of authority to the young, but Gong Er is bent on regaining the clan\u2019s status. Defeating Ip with the 64 Hands technique of Bagua confirms her in her narrow sense of tradition and honor. But when a skirmish with Ma San kills her father and he usurps her place in the household, she refuses to follow the path old Gong marked out for her: marriage, children, and medical career.<\/p>\n

The drive for revenge and justice fueling many classic martial arts films is here focused around Gong Er\u2019s tragic dilemma. To uphold the family\u2019s repute, she must destroy the tradition that her father created. Her plot line, unusually for a Wong film, actually thrusts forward dynamically. Her desires and goals sharpen into a conflict between two forms of duty: to her father\u2019s wishes and to his historic legacy. Had she been born a boy, she reflects, all would have been easier, presumably because she would have inherited the tradition that Ma seizes by force. As it is, they split the heritage: Ma San knows Xingyi, she knows Bagua. The battle on the train platform presents a clash of the two techniques that Master Gong so proudly synthesized. They will never be reunited.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a satisfaction in seeing Gong Er use her father\u2019s decisive strike to vanquish Ma San, and she keeps part of her pledge by fulfilling his request that she become a doctor. Yet it\u2019s a hollow victory. Her decision to disobey her father in the name of righteousness eventually comes to nothing. History intervenes and she winds up fleeing to Hong Kong as Ip has. Sworn never to marry or teach kung-fu, Gong Er dies, and her father\u2019s beautiful variant of the 64 Hands technique dies with her.<\/p>\n

But not the tradition of honor and teaching her father represented. In a crucial passage early on, old Gong announces his pride in uniting Bagua and Xinyi, and he wishes he were able to bring Southern martial arts to China. Ip, however, reminds him that the world is bigger; why stop with China? When Gong Er\u2019s Bagua defeats Ip\u2019s Wing Chun, she upbraids him in similar terms: he needs to widen his vision to encompass what the 64 Hands can do.<\/p>\n

Fleeing the civil war, Ip carries his experience to a martial arts culture quite different from Foshan\u2019s. From the luxurious brothel where martial artists gather to spar and honor their elders, Ip is brought to Tai Nan Street in Hong Kong. There rows of schools beg for customers, lion dancers brawl, and ruffians splash out money for some quick lessons. Ip\u2019s resolute purity of spirit sets him apart from this shabby milieu. By the end of the film, having encountered other schools and styles and incorporating some into his repertoire, Ip carries the entire tradition of Chinese kung-fu to the world. His grinning young pupil would be known as Bruce Lee.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The button and the box<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cI was lucky to meet you in my prime,\u201d Gong Er tells Ip during their last meeting in Hong Kong. Her remark points two ways, toward their trials in combat but also toward the love that might have been. To the kung-fu genre Wong brings his characteristic register of languorous melodrama with its missed opportunities and lingering reflection on what might have been.<\/p>\n

As sometimes happens in Wong\u2019s films, love tokens are on display. When the Japanese invasion prevents Ip from visiting Gong Er, he sells his heavy coat to get money to feed his family, but he tears off one button to keep as a reminder. In Hong Kong he obliges Er to take it. At their last meeting, she returns the button to him, but after her death she reciprocates his gift by giving him the gilded box that holds the ashes of her hair.<\/p>\n

Significantly, the Chinese version ends not with Ip\u2019s success as a teacher but with images of the Buddhist temple where Gong Er made her pledge. This epilogue is at once a recollection of her tragic choice and an echo of her father. Throughout the film, the martial arts tradition is identified with fire: Gong\u2019s brother\u2019s cookstove, his balletic offering of a match for Ip\u2019s cigarette, Gong Er’s burning of her lock of hair (above). The motif becomes crucial when Gong Er takes the lamp flickering beneath the Buddha to be a sign of her father\u2019s permission to pursue Ma San. Now, in the shots that conclude the film, many lamps and candles burn under many Buddhas. We\u2019re reminded of the monastic source of Shaolin kung-fu and the fact that Ip is the man who, as old Gong urged, will \u201ckeep the light burning.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The final temple shots aren\u2019t in the later versions, and the U. S. cut drastically compresses the scene of her first visit to the temple, omitting the crucial details of the lamp as a sign. Other differences play up the romance element more strongly. In the Chinese version, Ip\u2019s childhood is covered in the summary montage at the start, and Gong Er\u2019s isn\u2019t shown at all. The European and American versions build a stronger link between the two through parallels. In her opium flashback, Gong Er is shown learning the Bagua technique by spying on her father; soon he is training her. These glimpses of girlhood are intercut with her doing sets in the snow. Soon afterward, we get Ip\u2019s flashback to his boyhood when he was accepted as a student by Master Chan Wah-shun. The two sequences create a sort of secret bond between the quasi-lovers.<\/p>\n

More generally, the American version highlights the muffled romance between Ip and Gong Er. Their exchange of letters now includes fantasy inserts of him visiting her father\u2019s compound and the two practicing in a parlor. It\u2019s suggested that his wife is aware of his attraction to Er and gives him permission to embark on the visit that is blocked by the war. After the war and a string of scenes showing Ip and other martial artists marooned in Hong Kong, the romance returns. Ip visits Gong Er and catches up on her doings during last decade.<\/p>\n

A new romance seems even likelier because of the way Wong has repositioned Ip\u2019s realization that he and his wife won\u2019t be reunited. In the Chinese and European releases, this comes very late, after Gong Er\u2019s death. It marks his admission that he has no chance to return home, that he can only press forward. But the U.S. version slots in this sequence earlier, holding out the possibility of a romantic liaison between Ip and Er. This prospect is consonant with the version\u2019s more prolonged lead-in to her flashback to 1940, which includes her bodyguard Jiang telling her that her father would approve of her marriage to Ip. She then goes out onto the terrace, clasping the button, and, as we see shots of Ip intercut with shots of her, we hear her narration: \u201cMr. Ip, it was ten years ago\u2026.\u201d Is it a displaced passage of dialogue, shifted from her telling him the story earlier? Or is it an internal monologue addressed to him, as if by telepathy? This poetic ambivalence isn\u2019t there in the earlier versions.<\/p>\n

What is <\/em>there in all versions is the reiterated parallel between martial artistry and affairs of the heart. After their bout in the brothel, seeing the 64 Hands again becomes Ip\u2019s shorthand for seeing Gong Er again. Their quietly flirtatious exchange of letters sets up a rematch that\u2019s also a rendezvous. Another link between love and kung-fu comes with Master Gong\u2019s advice. \u201cBetter to go forward than stay in place\u201d becomes Gong Er\u2019s watchword in fighting for her patrimony and vowing to stay celibate. But she also recalls the admonition her father addressed to Ma San: \u201cKung fu isn\u2019t just charging forward. Look behind you as well.\u201d Ma San, who says he collaborated with the Japanese because good warriors adjust to the moment, failed to look back to Master Gong\u2019s precepts of modesty and upright conduct. In Hong Kong, Gong Er discovers the emotional dimension of her father\u2019s lesson. Having gone on as far as she can (\u201ca road I won\u2019t see to the end\u201d), she can only look back at what might have been\u2014her love for Ip Man.<\/p>\n

In a fulfillment of her father\u2019s advice to look beyond the mountains, she has \u201cseen the world. Sadly, I can\u2019t pass on what I know.\u201d Ip can. As a teacher like old Gong, he advances resolutely into the future. Yet he still longs to see the 64 Hands technique one more time. The Old Monkey move, Master Gong says, involves \u201clooking back in reflection.\u201d Only Wong Kar-wai would turn advice about combat tactics into an admonition to preserve the memory of unconsummated love.<\/p>\n

\n

Thanks to Li Cheuk-to, Tony Rayns, Ben Brewster, Lea Jacobs, and Kristin for information and ideas about The Grandmaster<\/em>. A special thanks to Zhang Junyi for his enthusiastic help with Chinese-language sources.<\/p>\n

Both the European and American versions of The Grandmaster<\/em> feature a credit cookie lasting about a minute in which Ip, on a stylized staircase, leads us through a flurry of fights and then cocks an eye at the camera: \u201cWhat\u2019s your style?\u201d It\u2019s probably too knowing a parallel between style-conscious Wong and Ip, but its break with the noble and poignant tone of the main ending is pretty typical of Hong Kong cinema\u2019s insouciant storytelling.<\/p>\n

A revealing glimpse into Wong\u2019s working methods is provided by his cinematographer<\/a>.\u00a0Justin Chang’s\u00a0Variety<\/em>\u00a0interview<\/a>\u00a0with Wong is likewise informative.\u00a0Wong talks about shooting on film here<\/a>, remarking that he knew it was time to wrap when Fuji couldn\u2019t supply any more 35mm stock. There are many sharp reviews of the film, but the one by Kozo here<\/a>\u00a0is one of the most nuanced. He sees the film as opening up new paths in Wong’s development.<\/p>\n

Arguing that the U. S. cut ruins the film, David Ehrlich provides\u00a0a very helpful and detailed list<\/a>\u00a0of the differences between the Hong Kong\u00a0Grandmaster<\/em>\u00a0and the U. S. release.\u00a0The Chinese version (all-region, with good English subtitles) may be ordered from yesasia in either Blu-ray<\/a> or standard DVD<\/a>. The European version I worked from is the French one, available here<\/a> as a typically flashy Wong package.<\/p>\n

The other Ip Man films are quite different and heavily fictionalized, but at least the first three are worth watching as updates of long-standing martial-arts genre conventions. They include stirring sequences of GOFRBSKF (Good Old-Fashioned Righteous Butt-Stomping Kung-Fu). Herman Yau\u2019s Ip Man: The Legend Is Born<\/em> (2010) has a nifty secene in which an old man instructively thrashes the young Ip in a cramped pharmacy. The pharmacist is played by Ip Chun, son of the real Ip Man and president of the Hong Kong Wing Chun association. Yau\u2019s film also contains a brief passage of sparring between legends Sammo Hung and Yuen Biao. According to this story<\/a>, the Ip Man cycle has led to booming enrollment in Wing Chun schools.<\/p>\n

Back to Wong Kar-wai: The Hong Kong International Film Festival always runs a retrospective on one director or star, and this year the attention fell on Andrew Lau Wai-Kung. Known principally as the director of the Infernal Affairs<\/em> trilogy, he began his career as a cinematographer. The long interview in the program’s book, Filmmaker in Focus: Andrew Lau,<\/em> reveals a lot of material about Hong Kong industry practices from the 1980s onward. Wong fans will be especially interested in what he has to say about filming As Tears Go By<\/em>. (It’s not usually mentioned that Lau also shot a great deal of Chungking Express<\/em> before Chris Doyle replaced him.) Filmmaker in Focus: Andrew Lau<\/em> is available from the publications page of HKIFF.<\/a>\u00a0Thanks to Li Cheuk-to for his assistance–and for his correction of a translation!<\/p>\n

Some of the ideas I float in this entry are developed at greater length in the revised edition of\u00a0Planet Hong Kong<\/a>.<\/p>\n

P.S. 23 September 2013, later:<\/strong> Today it was announced<\/a> that The Grandmaster<\/em> will be Hong Kong’s submission for the Academy Award for Foreign-Language Film. But which version?<\/p>\n

P.P.S. 23 September 2013, still later:<\/strong> Li Cheuk-to writes to tell me that the version submitted for the Oscars is the U.S. version, which has played seven times in Hong Kong in order to qualify.<\/p>\n

P.P.P.S 18 October:<\/strong> Harvey Weinstein talks about the changes in the US version. “At the end of the day, who gives a shit?”<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

DB here: The summer has brought us two major films by the two leading Hong Kong directors. I\u2019ve discussed Johnnie To\u2019s fine Drug War earlier. Now it\u2019s time for some ideas about The Grandmaster. Wong Kar-wai’s film displays, in fairly straightforward ways, some of his typical artistic and commercial strategies. Here he adapts his characteristic […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[118,54,37,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-directors-wong-kar-wai","category-narrative-strategies","category-national-cinemas-hong-kong","category-readers-favorite-entries"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24553"}],"version-history":[{"count":51,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24553\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39232,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24553\/revisions\/39232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}