![\"the-tonto-woman.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/the-tonto-woman.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Kristin here\u2014<\/p>\n
I don\u2019t think I\u2019ve ever seen a single theater playing all five nominees for the best-picture Oscar. It\u2019s happening now at the six-screen Sundance Cinemas<\/a> here in Madison, plus they\u2019ve got The Diving Bell and the Butterfly<\/em> (nominated for director, cinematography, adapted screenplay, and editing) and Persepolis<\/em> (animated-feature nominee). The latter is very impressive, and I think it would win in an ordinary year, but probably not when it\u2019s up against Ratatouille<\/em>.<\/p>\n [February 9. That outcome seems even more likely now. Last night Ratatouille<\/em> won nine Annie Awards, prizes given out by the professional animation community. In the 35 years of those awards’ existence, only once has the top animated feature prize not gone to the film that went on to win the best animated film Oscar. Pixar’s accompanying short, Your Friend the Rat<\/em>, won best short subject. It’s not eligible for an Oscar, since it was a supplement on the Ratatouille<\/em> DVD and not shown theatrically.]<\/p>\n Films like these get widely seen, obviously. An awful lot of films, though, get nominated for Oscars that far fewer people will see. How many people fill out their office Oscar pool ballots knowing anything about the short animated and live-action films? Some you can track down online or on TV (HBO, Sundance, the IFC, and so on), but viewing them all would be difficult.<\/p>\n For three years now, however, Magnolia Pictures<\/a> has been packaging the films in those two categories into a single program that goes out to theaters and then onto DVD. Magnolia is a small independent distributor, best known perhaps for its documentaries, including Enron: Smartest Guys in the Room<\/em> and Capturing the Friedmans<\/em> and for its imports like Ong Bak<\/em> and The World\u2019s Fastest Indian<\/em>.<\/p>\n This year\u2019s program, \u201cThe 2007 Academy Award Nominated Shorts,\u201d<\/a> is listed on the company\u2019s website<\/a> as playing in 80 theaters, though perhaps that number will rise. Many of the runs (including the one at our Sundance Cinemas) start on February 15, and others are scheduled from then on into April.<\/p>\n Thanks to Sarah Simonds, manager at Sundance, I was able to get an early look at the ten films on the program.<\/p>\n As one might predict, the range of quality is greater in the live-action films than in the animated ones. I\u2019m not sure why that would be predictable, but I have my suspicions. There\u2019s not much of a theatrical market for live-action shorts, which mainly get seen at festivals and on TV. They tend to be portfolio films, made by people trying to attract attention and move up to features. Hence they more often come from beginners. Animators who don\u2019t want to work their way up through big studios\u2014and who stand little chance of ever directing a major animated feature\u2014or who simply value their independence may stick with shorts.<\/p>\n Another factor working in favor of animation is that it\u2019s a medium that demands the detailed planning of literally every frame. No improvisation, no casual shooting in real locales, no direct sound. All in all, I think that if I were an Academy member, I\u2019d have more trouble making a decision in the animated-shorts category.<\/p>\n Real, Live People<\/strong><\/p>\n In the live-action category there\u2019s no doubt that I would vote for The Tonto Woman<\/em>, a UK short directed by Daniel Barber from an Elmore Leonard short story. Remarkably, Barber had mainly directed TV commercials before embarking on this, his first 35mm short, as a way of breaking into the film industry. He produced and funded it himself, with a ten-day shoot in Spain using locations and standing sets that had figured in such films as A Fistful of Dollars<\/em> and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly<\/em>.<\/p>\n The result might be described as The Piano<\/em> meets There Will Be Blood<\/em>. A cattle rustler (well played by Anthony Quinn\u2019s son Francesco) encounters a rich man\u2019s wife (Charlotte Asprey) who is living in enforced seclusion after having been kidnapped and held for eleven years by Mojave Indians (image above). The film has landscapes with the epic quality of both There Will Be Blood<\/em> and No Country for Old Men<\/em>, and its drama has the depth of a feature film without feeling rushed in its 35 minutes.<\/p>\n Leonard\u2019s website has a press release<\/a> giving more details, as well as a profile of Berber<\/a>. The latter suggests that the director has been contacted by people within the film industry. All I can say is, fund this man immediately. I definitely want to see what he could do at feature length.<\/p>\n David has written quite a bit about the lively contemporary Danish cinema, including two entries on this blog, here<\/a> and here<\/a>. The country continues to be on a filmic roll in terms of Oscar nominations, with the short At Night<\/em> being the one I\u2019d vote if I were an Academy member and weren\u2019t already voting for The Tonto Woman<\/em>. It\u2019s directed by Christian E. Christiansen and produced by Zentropa with support from the Danish Film Institute.<\/p>\n The subject matter sounds like the sort of thing that would ordinarily make me run the other way: three very young women with cancer bonding in the hospital ward they share. But the film avoids the touchy-feely clich\u00e9s that so easily could sink such a project (except for a conventional Polaroid-photo montage of their little New Year\u2019s party). It\u2019s not just a sick-women\u2019s-solidarity picture. One does come to care about these three and to understand how their illnesses make them better able to communicate with each other than with their families. It manages to pack a considerable emotional impact into forty minutes. Again, here is someone who could probably direct a fine feature film\u2014and, given the current strength of the country\u2019s industry, may well get the chance.<\/p>\n Tanghi Argentini<\/em> is a charming comedy from Flemish director Guido Thys, dealing with an office worker who asks a colleague to teach him how to tango to impress a woman he has met on the internet. It combines a clever concept with a surprise twist at the end that works so well in both the short-story and short-film format. It\u2019s entertaining but not so unusual or substantial that I would think of it as Oscar-worthy.<\/p>\n The two other films, France\u2019s Le Mozart des Pickpockets<\/em> (director\/writer\/actor Philippe Pollet-Villard) and Italy\u2019s The Substitute<\/em> (director Andrea Jublin), though both amusing, seemed surprisingly lightweight and conventional to have received nominations.<\/p>\n Puppets and Pictures<\/strong><\/p>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Trying to decide which of these animated shorts I would vote for is more difficult. Each is well-executed, entertaining, and imaginative. I tried thinking which I would want to watch again, which I would recommend to friends.<\/p>\n By those standards, there are again two stand-outs for me. I\u2019d ultimately opt for M\u00eame les pigeons vont au paradis<\/em> (Even Pigeons Go to Heaven<\/em>), a French puppet film by Samuel Tourneux. It\u2019s about a priest who attempts to sell a heaven-simulating machine to a miserly peasant about to be visited by the Grim Reaper. It’s fast-paced, very funny, and beautifully detailed in its depictions of the characters and settings. It’s not claymation, but it has some of the polish and wit of Aardman shorts.<\/p>\n Suzie Templeton animating the Duck for <\/em>Peter & the Wolf*<\/p>\n I suspect the Oscar winner might well be Peter & the Wolf<\/em><\/a>, a British-Polish co-production that illustrates the classic Sergei Prokofiev tone poem. It was directed by Suzie Templeton<\/a> and made at the Se-ma-for Studios in \u0141\u00f3d\u017a. There\u2019s no doubt that it\u2019s an impressive item, with elaborate miniature studio sets that could pass for real landscapes, precise and amusing puppets, and a mind-boggling frame-by-frame manipulation of furry puppets that leaves nary a ripple in their hair. (The photo above hints at how the latter feat was accomplished.) Still, the appeal of the original music is its evocation of events in our mind\u2019s eye, and for me the literal playing out of those events at times carried a faint air of tedium. It\u2019s the sort of prestige project that one can imagine a lot of Academy members loving.<\/p>\n I\u2019m very much of two minds about Madame Tutli Putli<\/em><\/a>, the seemingly inevitable entry from the National Film Board of Canada (directed by Chris Lavis and Maciek Szczerborski). A puppet film four years in production, it is an extraordinary technical accomplishment. It deals with a mousey woman who takes a train journey that confronts her with bizarre and ultimately threatening events. The grim tone and grubby puppets and objects reminded me of Jan Svankmajer\u2019s work.<\/p>\n The most disturbing thing about the images, however, is not the subject matter but the creepily realistic eyes. To me it was obvious that real eyes had been superimposed onto the puppets\u2019 faces. Investigating how this had been done, I found this brief making-of demonstration<\/a> on YouTube, which indeed revealed the main character to be a puppet with blank areas where the eyes would be. Looking further, I learned that the special effects were done by painter\/animator Jason Walker, who devised a complicated process to coordinate the photographed eyes with the animation. Some demonstrations of that process are available here<\/a>, and there is an interview with him here<\/a>.<\/p>\n There\u2019s no doubt that the technique is unnerving, and yet at the same time it\u2019s distracting (if one notices it). Is it \u201cfair\u201d? Of course people have been combining live action and animation in various ways since the 1910s. Yet superimposing photographed elements in such a way as to make them appear to be part of the animation almost seems like cheating. Here one would be tempted to marvel at how skillfully the animators had simulated human eyes\u2014a notoriously difficult subject to capture realistically. I suppose for many viewers the eyes and the rest of the image would blend seamlessly and not prove distracting. For me, it didn\u2019t quite work.<\/p>\n Overall, the program is undoubtedly worth seeing on the big screen.<\/p>\n As to the previous two programs of Oscar nominees, see here<\/a> for the list of 2005 shorts and here<\/a> for the DVD; see here<\/a> for the 2006 list and here<\/a> for the DVD.<\/p>\n *The production image from Peter & the Wolf<\/em> derives from a making-of short on the British release of the German-made DVD (from Arthaus Musik), which now seems to be out of print.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Kristin here\u2014 I don\u2019t think I\u2019ve ever seen a single theater playing all five nominees for the best-picture Oscar. It\u2019s happening now at the six-screen Sundance Cinemas here in Madison, plus they\u2019ve got The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (nominated for director, cinematography, adapted screenplay, and editing) and Persepolis (animated-feature nominee). The latter is very […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,89,1,41,54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-animation","category-art-cinema","category-film-comments","category-independent-american-film","category-narrative-strategies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1930"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13135,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1930\/revisions\/13135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"at-night.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/at-night.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"meme-des-pigeons2.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/meme-des-pigeons2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"my-love.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/my-love.jpg\" "\\"my-love.jpg\\"")
My close second choice would be a very different sort of film, My Love<\/em>, from Russia, directed by Alexander Petrov. It\u2019s a pretty, lyrical tale of a fifteen-year-old boy\u2019s idealistic yearnings after a pretty servant girl and a more glamorous and mysterious woman who lives next door. The animation is impressionistic and shimmering, with constantly added brushstrokes transforming the compositions. Its visual style is derived from nineteenth-century Russian realist painting, especially that of Ilya Repin.<\/p>\n![\"peter-the-wolf.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/peter-the-wolf.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"i-met-the-walrus.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/i-met-the-walrus.jpg\" "\\"i-met-the-walrus.jpg\\"")
The same cannot be said for the edgier I Met The Walrus<\/em><\/a>, from Canada. It\u2019s derived from an existing soundtrack, a tape-recording made by a 14-year-old Jerry Levitan when he snuck into John Lennon\u2019s hotel room and interviewed him. Now, many years later, director Josh Raskin has created an animated image track to accompany it. It\u2019s a clever idea, but to me the illustrations of Lennon\u2019s words soon became a bit too literal, and I found myself thinking that the animation was Terry Gilliam (in his Monty Python days, that is) meets Yellow Submarine<\/em> meets Max Ernst collage-novel.<\/p>\n![\"madame-tutli-putli.jpg\"](\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/madame-tutli-putli.jpg\")
<\/p>\n