{"id":16578,"date":"2012-01-05T09:44:55","date_gmt":"2012-01-05T15:44:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/?p=16578"},"modified":"2013-05-14T16:58:40","modified_gmt":"2013-05-14T21:58:40","slug":"pandoras-digital-box-at-the-festival","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2012\/01\/05\/pandoras-digital-box-at-the-festival\/","title":{"rendered":"Pandora&#8217;s digital box: At the festival"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_06a.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16580\" title=\"screenshot_06a\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_06a.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"109\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_06a.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_06a-150x81.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_079.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16581\" title=\"screenshot_07\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_079.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"109\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_079.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_079-150x81.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_0810.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16582\" title=\"screenshot_08\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_0810.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"110\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_0810.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_0810-150x82.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_09a.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16583\" title=\"screenshot_09a\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_09a.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"109\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_09a.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_09a-150x81.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_10a.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16584\" title=\"screenshot_10a\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_10a.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"109\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_10a.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_10a-150x81.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_1113.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16585\" title=\"screenshot_11\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_1113.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"109\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_1113.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_1113-150x81.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Of the thirty-three titles I saw at the Toronto International Film Festival this year, only nine were projected on 35mm film. The rest were shown on HDCam or Digital Cinema Package. At the first TIFF I attended in 2002, I saw a comparable number of films and all were projected on 35mm or 16mm film.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Jim Healy, Director of Programming, <a href=\"http:\/\/cinema.wisc.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\">University of Wisconsin&#8211;Madison Cinematheque<\/a><\/p>\n<p>DB here:<\/p>\n<p>Do you complain about ads before movies? In the Digital Age you can expect more of them because there will be ads for the theatre\u2019s projector and server and even the financing agent that supplied them.<\/p>\n<p>The most aggressive preshow attraction, which I saw before every digital screening at this year\u2019s Vancouver Film Festival, is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=BB1oUCIdvQk&amp;feature=related\" target=\"_blank\">the one promoting Dolby servers<\/a>. Play when ready.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/BB1oUCIdvQk\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>A dirty film countdown leader explodes into sleek digitalia, alchemizing cinema into the four elements. Photochemical imagery can&#8217;t bear trial by fire and is annihilated <em>Terminator<\/em>-style. But the flames are extinguished by earth (flowers), air (blue vapor) and icy water. McLuhan said film was a hot medium, but does that automatically make digital cool?<\/p>\n<p>Take the clip as a victory dance. By September, when I saw the Dolby Armageddon trailer, things had already tipped. Digital projection, the immediate future for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2011\/12\/01\/pandoras-digital-box-in-the-multiplex\/\" target=\"_blank\">multiplexes<\/a> and for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2011\/12\/15\/pandoras-digital-box-the-last-35-picture-show\/\" target=\"_blank\">small-town houses<\/a>, has become a festival mainstay too. But the problems are more marked on the fest scene than in commercial venues. If you visit a festival and there\u2019s a hiccup during a screening, count to ten before hollering. The staff, already overstretched, is facing something far less tranquil than the concluding frames of the Dolby ad&#8211;something more like the hellfire frames you see at the start.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Screener savers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_07-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16648\" title=\"screenshot_07 400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_07-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"304\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_07-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_07-400-150x114.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/screenshot_07-400-394x300.jpg 394w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Screener for <strong>Target<\/strong> (Alexander Zeldovich. 2011).<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Films get into festivals two ways: By being invited or being submitted blind. A programmer might invite a film solely on the filmmaker\u2019s reputation. For instance, every festival wants the next Wong Kar-wai film (assuming he ever finishes it), and you would probably accept it sight unseen. More often the programmer catches the film at another festival, or in a private screening, or in a privately circulated video copy. That first viewing might be on any format. If the filmmaker submits the work, it will typically show up on a DVD copy, called a \u201cscreener.\u201d Some festivals prefer the film to be uploaded to the site <a href=\"https:\/\/www.withoutabox.com\/index.php?cmd=filmcollection.demo\" target=\"_blank\">Withoutabox<\/a>. The selection committee watches the submission to make an initial decision about the work.<\/p>\n<p>Members of the press who attend a festival can usually get a look at some of the films via screeners. Often local critics watch screeners, especially if they have to write a review in advance of the festival and they\u2019ve missed a press screening. Visiting programmers also borrow screeners from the festival because they usually can\u2019t see all the films they might want to.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is that screeners tend to be of wretched quality. Burned to DVD-R, sometimes from a VHS tape, and often in the wrong ratio or anamorphically squeezed, they are usually garnished with a more or less prominent watermark, either a \u201cproperty of\u201d one or simply a timecode readout chattering away. I can\u2019t imagine claiming to have seen the movie after watching the typical screener. Kristin and I have used them to pull frames for our blog entries when we visit festivals, but only after we watch the films in projection.<\/p>\n<p>Screeners look shabby by design. Anything approaching the finished film in image quality will be pirated, and the watermark announces that the dub you bought from the blanket on the street is stolen. I have seen a screener assigned to a particular person, his name as a caption throughout, so the distributor will know whom to pursue if it\u2019s leaked.<\/p>\n<p>Screeners made it much easier for filmmakers to afford to submit work to many festivals; imagine what costs were like in the days before videotape, when films were sent out on prints. But the emergence of screeners, I think, cheapened the film. VHS tape and many commercial DVDs make movies look ugly, but DVD screeners are far worse. Nonetheless, they are a fixture of the festival scene. As with so much about digital video, we can\u2019t go back.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Digitalis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/HD-CAm-deck-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16717\" title=\"HD CAm deck 400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/HD-CAm-deck-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"220\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/HD-CAm-deck-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/HD-CAm-deck-400-150x82.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Sony HDW-D1800 HDCam deck.\u00a0List price: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fullcompass.com\/product\/334887.html\" target=\"_blank\">$45,045<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Screeners are watched mostly behind the scene, treated as tools for programmers and critics. What about the things the audience sees?<\/p>\n<p>For commercial projection in your local \u2018plex, Hollywood companies realized that a proliferation of digital standards was bad for business. So they set up the Digital Cinema Initiative, which established specifications for the <strong>Digital Cinema Package<\/strong>\u2014the ensemble of files packed onto that matte silver brick that is replacing traditional film rolled up on reels. The DCP files are encrypted and opened up with passkeys that are supplied separately. The DCP plays 2K or 4K digital video on the two standard projection systems, the DLP one established by Texas Instruments and the SXRD one established by Sony. It\u2019s Microsoft vs. Apple all over again: the DLP format is licensed to several projector manufacturers (Christie, NEC, Barco) but the Sony format is used only on Sony machines.<\/p>\n<p>Besides the DCP, there are many other digital formats for displaying moving images. Erik Gunneson, a filmmaker and teacher here at the University of Wisconsin\u2014Madison, ran through some of the most common ones with me. They\u2019re distinguished by many factors, but two common measures are resolution and compression. The more lines, the higher the resolution; the less compression, the better the image (although some compression is inevitable in any digital video projection.) Many of these are capture formats\u2014that is, means of recording\u2014that are also used for playback.<\/p>\n<p>The earliest to emerge were the <strong>DV formats<\/strong>, all consumer\/ prosumer platforms. They use \u201cstandard definition\u201d video codecs, as opposed to High Definition ones. There\u2019s a bewildering number of DV cameras and playback devices, because Sony and Panasonic developed different improvements on the basic standards (720 x 480 resolution). The most common versions, <strong>Mini DV<\/strong> and <strong>DV Cam<\/strong>, use tape for capture. They are fading out in independent filmmaking, but some festivals still screen in these formats.<\/p>\n<p>Home viewers are probably most familiar with the <strong>DVD<\/strong>, which in the NTSC standard uses MPEG-2 video compression at 720 x 480 resolution. On a large screen, your typical DVD is unsightly. <strong>Blu-ray<\/strong> discs, of course, look better, partly because of their higher definition (as high as 1920 x 1080 resolution).<\/p>\n<p>At the professional level, you have several options, mostly provided by Sony: <strong>Betacam SP<\/strong>, an analog format, and <strong>Digital Betacam, <\/strong>known as DigiBeta<strong>. <\/strong>\u00a0They use tape, not hard drives, to record image and sound. But they\u2019re falling into disuse now because of the rise of <strong>HDCam<\/strong>. It can use either tape or optical drives as recording media. HDCam playback can through up-sampling yield standard HD images of 1920 x 1080 pixels, and this makes it a popular option for independent filmmakers. PBS documentaries are often shot on HDCam.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s also <strong>HDCam SR<\/strong>, which yields, as they say, \u201cnative\u201d 1920 x 1080 resolution and audio features. The SR format was initially designed for high-end special effects (bluescreen\/ greenscreen) and became allied with Panavision in the creation of the Genesis camera. SR is sometimes used for television series. As you\u2019d expect from a studio-based format, it\u2019s expensive. <a href=\"http:\/\/pro.sony.com\/bbsccms\/assets\/files\/micro\/xdcam\/solutions\/Sony_HD_Formats_Guide.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">According to Sony<\/a>, an HDCam SR system runs about $230,000, and a 124-minute blank cassette (the same engineering as the old Sony Beta cassette) costs about $424.<\/p>\n<p>Many of these formats come in various flavors: PAL or NTSC, anamorphic or unsqueezed, progressive or interlaced, recent upgrade or older specs, settings for various frame rates, and on and on. And there are still other recording and playback formats, such as HDV, DVCPro, and D5\u00a0HD\u00a0. When talkies came in, maybe there were as many competing sound systems floating around alongside the two studio standards. But back then, there weren\u2019t film festivals.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Format flare-ups<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Digibeta-400.tif\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16720\" title=\"Digibeta 400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Digibeta-400.tif\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Sony J30SDI Compact Betacam Player; plays Betacam, Digital Betacam, Beta SP et al. Price: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fullcompass.com\/product\/334887.html\" target=\"_blank\">$21,000<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>You the programmer have accepted a digital film for your festival. When it arrives to be shown, what format will it be on? Viewers used to home formats may expect that they&#8217;ll watch it on DVD or Blu-ray. But DVD isn\u2019t usually suitable for projection to large audiences. Professionally produced Blu-ray discs are feasible for some public showings, but home-made Blu-rays burned by filmmakers on their own computers are notoriously unreliable. They\u2019re likely to freeze up during projection. (This is one reason that many festivals insist that filmmakers not submit work on Blu-ray; DVD remains less unstable.) And good as Blu-ray looks on your home monitor, it&#8217;s inferior to the best professional projection formats.<\/p>\n<p>So a higher-end playback is needed for most festival exhibition. Usually filmmakers say that they\u2019d like the film screened on the format it was shot on, but this isn\u2019t always possible. Remember that festivals move into existing venues, either multiplexes or arthouse theatres. What you can show will be constrained by what equipment is already in the booths, or what can be rented or purchased, then squeezed in for the occasion.<\/p>\n<p>To keep things manageable, festivals have to restrict what exhibition formats they will use. Here are the formats listed in the submission requirements of some major festivals:<\/p>\n<p>Telluride: Only 35mm or DigiBeta.<\/p>\n<p>Seattle: 35mm, 16mm, or HDCam.<\/p>\n<p>Toronto: 35mm, DCP, or HDCam.<\/p>\n<p>Sundance (as of 2010): 35mm, 16mm, HDCam (NTSC 2), or HDCam (PAL 3).<\/p>\n<p>Ann Arbor: 35mm, 16mm, Mini DV, or Beta SP.<\/p>\n<p>Los Angeles: 35mm, 16mm, DCP, HDCam, DigiBeta anamorphic.<\/p>\n<p>Rotterdam: 35mm, 16mm, Betacam SP (PAL), DigiBeta (PAL), or DVCam.<\/p>\n<p>Filmmakers who want to submit a digital movie to lots of festivals will sooner or later have to convert the original files to another format. This process is expensive, and low-budget filmmakers may be tempted to try it at home, with dire results. If the filmmaker\u2019s conversion turns out to be unplayable, the festival may have to try converting the movie itself or revert to the film\u2019s original platform, which means bringing in other playback equipment.<\/p>\n<p>Alexandra Cantin, Print Traffic Manager of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psfilmfest.org\/festival\/index.aspx?FID=53\" target=\"_blank\">the Palm Springs International Film Festival<\/a>, notes:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Festivals have always been the bridge from the traditional to the latest, greatest technology and everything in between. Whatever the filmmaker could afford to finish on is what we have to work with. At times I have managed as many as 13 formats.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Worse, for any specific screening there may be several formats in play. The festival trailer-and-sponsor reel is unlikely to be on film these days, more likely on Blu-ray or HDCam. The feature may be accompanied by a short, which can be on any number of formats. A program of short films presents its own problems, since they may come in a bevy of formats.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, recall the central situation of festival screenings\u2014many different movies played in a few venues continually. Let\u2019s say that a given screen is used for five movies in a day, at 10 AM, 1 PM, 4 PM, 7 PM, and 10 PM. The schedule leaves very little time, at most half an hour, to test how a given film will play before its show starts. Of course, the film can be previewed days or weeks ahead of the screening\u2014if it arrives in plenty of time. (Most don\u2019t.) So projectionists, programmers, and technical staff are constantly juggling time slots, formats, and different auditoriums. <em>Can we play this HDCam copy of <\/em>Dark Bohemian Days<em> on Screen 1? No, because the HDCam deck is only in Theatre 2 and Theatre 4. But <\/em>Bohemian Days<em> is over two hours long, and all the other long films are in 2 and 4 so we don\u2019t have a slot available. We could move <\/em>Dad Was a Transvestite<em>, which is on DigiBeta, to a smaller screen, but we expect a big crowd for that, and we\u2019d shut people out, and anyhow Screen 1 won\u2019t have DigiBeta playback . . . .<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Moreover, most festivals want to be flexible\u2014adding screenings of popular titles, or substituting a film when another doesn\u2019t arrive in time. Multiple formats make on-the-fly adjustments more difficult.<\/p>\n<p>When you reflect on all the permutations of schedule, equipment, venues, formats, and staff assignments, it\u2019s rather miraculous that most festival screenings start on time and are well-projected.<\/p>\n<p>Then there\u2019s DCP.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>DCP = Damn Cinephile Problems?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/DCP-package-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16715\" title=\"DCP package 400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/DCP-package-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"304\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/DCP-package-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/DCP-package-400-150x114.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/DCP-package-400-394x300.jpg 394w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>The Digital Cinema Package and its shipping case.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>2011 has been the first big testing period for digital cinema at the major festivals. Several screenings have been delayed (by hours) or canceled. Occasionally digital copies were replaced by DVDs or 35mm prints (coming to be known as \u201canalog backups\u201d). In correspondence with several programmers and consultants, I\u2019ve garnered a sample of eye-opening reasons for the breakdowns. Most have to do with the Digital Cinema Package.<\/p>\n<p>The DCP, that gleaming brick drive seen above, is part of a larger digital environment. There\u2019s the projector. There&#8217;s the server in the booth that stores the film, along with trailers and other material, and allows the operator to build playlists for the show.\u00a0There&#8217;s the \u00a0Theatre Management System, an umbrella device that coordinates all the servers and projectors, along with lighting, curtains, and other aspects of presentation that can be automated. But all this hardware and software is inert without the Key Delivery Message, or KDM. (Get ready: We are living in the Age of Acronyms.)<\/p>\n<p>The Key Delivery Message is a security device. It\u2019s a very long alphanumeric string, usually sent to the exhibitor by email, that opens the DCP\u2019s files. It will work for only one movie on one server for a specified time period. If you want to play the same movie on a different server or projector, you need a second KDM. The KDM is tailored to the projector or server\u2019s media block, and it won\u2019t work if it can\u2019t \u201ctalk to\u201d that block. The arrangement keeps the DCP from playing on equipment that isn\u2019t certified as compliant with the standards of the Digital Cinema Initiative created by the Hollywood studios. The KDM also detects any tampering; if someone has tried to access the files impermissibly, the DCP won&#8217;t play.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly the KDM, like the DCP, is optimized for commercial theatres playing the same movie on the same screen for many days or weeks. In a festival, it creates headaches because the staff are cycling many titles through a single screen, or shifting one title from screen to screen.<\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, festivals must accept some DCPs. Today&#8217;s big-name \u201ccommercial arthouse\u201d films supported by major overseas companies and US distributors are likely to show up on DCP&#8211;films like <em>Melancholia<\/em>, <em>Certified Copy<\/em>, and similar high-end titles. These titles are the backbone of festival ticket sales.<\/p>\n<p>What could possibly go wrong?<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Projector problems:<\/span><\/strong> At one festival, the only DCP-capable projector broke down and had to be replaced by one that was flown in. An entirely new set of KDMs had to be generated.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Server\/ projector mismatches:<\/span><\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.viff.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Vancouver International Film Festival<\/a> Director Alan Franey explains what happened last year.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Christie Digital provided us with their best new projectors and Dolby provided us with their best new servers. Both Christie (in Ontario) and Dolby (in California) are sponsors of VIFF and give full attention to quality control and technical support. The problem was that the stuff was so new and improved that it didn\u2019t work, and no one knew why. . . . Since these two pieces of equipment had never interfaced before, there was unanticipated software incommunicability.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Alan indicates that once the software was amended, projector and server could communicate, but \u201cit took expert technicians 48 hours (without much sleep) to figure that out.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">DCP damage:<\/span><\/strong> Like all computer files, a DCP can be corrupted. Often a duplicate DCP is sent as a backup. But sometimes not, or sometimes that\u2019s corrupted too.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Ingestion digestion:<\/span> <\/strong>A booth\u2019s server has only a certain capacity, say seven hours. Alan Franey: \u201cAssayas\u2019 <em>Carlos<\/em> barely fit.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Under festival conditions DCPs are constantly being loaded into the server (\u201cingested\u201d) and extracted from it (\u201cdumped\u201d). For a feature-length movie, this can take an hour or more. Alexandra:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ingesting, dumping, and reingesting are common. We are showing so many titles that server space becomes an issue.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">KDM time intervals:<\/span> <\/strong>The permissible play period may be too confining. Shelly Kraicer, a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/dgeneratefilms.com\/critical-essays\/shelly-on-film-what-is-a-chinese-film\/\" target=\"_blank\">Chinese cinema expert <\/a>who has programmed at many festivals,\u00a0points out:<\/p>\n<p><strong>A screening could be aborted because of time-zone issues. A KDM has a start and stop date. If it too closely fits the screening dates (and that seems like what\u2019s been happening), then a twelve-hour time zone offset (say, Asia to East Coast USA) can put the KDM off by one day, and it could refuse to play.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">KDM\/ DCP matchups<\/span><\/strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">:<\/span> Even multiplexes are finding problems getting the KDM to open the DCP, with projectionists having to phone companies to walk through the security steps. The problems are exacerbated with foreign titles on DCP. Alexandra again:<\/p>\n<p><strong>What if the hard drive is coming from Poland and the KDM is being issued from a French lab that is closed for two weeks over Christmas? And the filmmaker is on location in the Philippines? This is a current real scenario.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Inflexibility of programming:<\/span><\/strong> Obviously DCP titles can only be screened in houses equipped with compliant projectors. Most booths in most festivals don\u2019t have such projectors and may not be getting them soon. Whereas 35mm prints can be lugged from spot to spot, a given DCP with its attendant KDM is locked to one house.<\/p>\n<p>Shelly notes that switching venues or adding showings is difficult:<\/p>\n<p><strong>If you need to move a DCP film from Screen A to Screen B tomorrow, you need to urgently request from the distributor that a new KDM be generated and sent and tested in time. This often doesn\u2019t work. (Try doing it over a weekend.) <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Alexandra agrees:<\/p>\n<p><strong>If one wants to change venues in response to audience demand, that is usually not possible unless the DCP is unencrypted, there\u2019s sufficient time for ingestion, and if there\u2019s a KDM that allows for it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>You can argue that these are teething pains. Venues will acquire servers and projectors, staff will become adroit at handling DCPs and KDMs, software will get standardized and hardware will get more reliable. Then things will run smoothly. And of course, 35mm was never free of snafus\u2014bad splices, wrong aspect ratios,\u00a0reels run out of order.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the new problems are of a different kind. 35mm was stable as a standardized format, however bollixed it could become in execution. Since about 1930, you bought a projector and you threaded the film into it and set your sound and ran your show. Now we\u2019re in an environment in which nothing is stable in a long-range time scheme. Alan Franey suggests why:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Everything we know about the constant rapid evolution of computers seems to suggest that we\u2019re in for rapid obsolescence, constant upgrades, and at showcases like VIFF, a lot of on-site beta testing. . . . We have every reason to fear a five-year replacement cycle. Robust, no; expensive, yes.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Doubtless festival directors and their teams will come up with something. Perhaps a less stringently secured format could replace DCP for festivals and arthouses, or films could be stored in the cloud. For non-DCP programs, perhaps filmmakers can project straight from their laptops. In all cases, accessible backups need to be available as well. In the meantime, Pandora\u2019s box has opened wide for the festival circuit.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Long live the analog backup<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reels-400.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16719\" title=\"Reels 400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reels-400.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"518\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reels-400.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reels-400-115x150.jpg 115w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Reels-400-231x300.jpg 231w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Can a festival simply go its own way\u2014refusing arcane digital formats, avoiding DCP, and showing good old 35mm? No. The big festivals will have to follow the lead of Cannes, which screened 60% of its titles last year in DCP. The midsize and small festivals are already disadvantaged. Distributors and producers want their films to premiere at the highest-tier festivals, and the few 35mm prints that exist are reserved for the bigger events.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, programmers who want desirable titles are being nudged\u2014or shoved\u2014to digital. Peter Porter, professor and Director of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spokanefilmfestival.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">the Spokane International Film Festival<\/a>, observes:<\/p>\n<p><strong>While we will always hear \u201cWe can\u2019t premiere with you,\u201d more often have I been hearing, \u201cIf you will screen non-35, you can have the title.\u201d In any case, if I insisted on 35mm prints, I would have no film festival. Of the forty or so features that we will screen, my guess is that fewer than ten will even be available on 35mm. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>At Vancouver this year, Kristin and I looked forward to seeing Kore-eda Hirokazu\u2019s <em>I Wish<\/em>. But when we learned from the catalog that it was screening digitally, snobby purists that we are, we thought we\u2019d wait for a chance to see a 35mm copy elsewhere. Yet our friends who went to the show came back delighted: A 35mm print was shown instead, with electronic subtitles. Fortunately, Kristin and I were able to catch the second screening, the same very pretty 35mm print.<\/p>\n<p>If the VIFF team had had to switch formats at the last minute, it was surely tough; but the smooth-running screening of <em>I Wish<\/em> made me think: <em>This could be the only time I\u2019ll ever see it on film.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>For the same reason, I went to <a href=\"http:\/\/cinema.wisc.edu\/series\/2011\/fall\/sunday-screenings-chazen\" target=\"_blank\">our Cinematheque screening of <em>Play Time<\/em><\/a> in mid-December. This film has been central to the way I think about cinema since my first encounter with it in the summer of 1973. It\u2019s an old friend. Maybe some day that well-traveled Janus print will serve as a backup for a digital screening. I might attend, with fingers crossed that the old reliable will be pressed back into service.<\/p>\n<p>This entry is one in a series about the conversion of film to digital-based systems. Earlier entries are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2011\/12\/01\/pandoras-digital-box-in-the-multiplex\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/2011\/12\/15\/pandoras-digital-box-the-last-35-picture-show\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Thanks very much to Alexandra Cantin, Alan Franey, Erik Gunneson, Jim Healy, Shelly Kraicer, and Pete Porter for sharing their knowledge with me. Thanks to Alissa Simon, programmer of the Palm Springs International Film Festival, as well. I&#8217;m also grateful to James Bond of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fullaperturesystems.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Full Aperture Systems<\/a> for a fact-filled lunch.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PS 5 January:<\/strong> Mark Peranson, Programming Associate at the Vancouver International Film Festival, writes to say that both DigiBeta and 35mm were options for <em>I Wish. <\/em>The staff were hopeful of getting a film print, but they were prepared to show digitally if the 35 didn&#8217;t come through. Thanks to Mark for correcting the first version of the entry, which claimed erroneously that a DCP had failed. Serves me right for believing gossip.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PPS 7 January:\u00a0<\/strong>Thanks to Antti Alanen for reminding me to mention 4K as another format played in DCP. By the way, his <a href=\"http:\/\/anttialanenfilmdiary.blogspot.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Film Diary<\/a> is always worth visiting; the latest entry surveys programs currently playing at major film archives.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PPPS 31 January:<\/strong> David Dinnell, Program Director of the Ann Arbor Film Festival writes:<\/p>\n<p><strong>I thought it might be of interest to you that the Ann\u00a0Arbor Film Festival hasn&#8217;t exhibited any works on tape for the past\u00a0four years. We have moved to a digital file playback system, which has\u00a0been able to accommodate the various SD, HD and compression codecs\u00a0independent filmmakers use. I think we are one of the first festivals\u00a0to go this route.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Thanks to David for the information.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PPPPS 1 February 2012:<\/strong> Thanks to Sven Jense of Rotterdam for pointing out that I should stress that the DCP is the collection of files on the hard drive, not the hard drive itself. In practice, people speak of both as the DCP, the way that speaking of a package of anything refers both to the contents and the container.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tati-cropped-500.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-16652\" title=\"Tati cropped 500\" src=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tati-cropped-500.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"305\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tati-cropped-500.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tati-cropped-500-150x91.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Tati-cropped-500-491x300.jpg 491w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Jacques Tati explains <strong>Play Time<\/strong> in a prologue included with the film during its New York release in 1973. From a 35mm print, scanned at 2000dpi.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Of the thirty-three titles I saw at the Toronto International Film Festival this year, only nine were projected on 35mm film. The rest were shown on HDCam or Digital Cinema Package. At the first TIFF I attended in 2002, I saw a comparable number of films [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[177,9,189],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-cinema","category-festivals","category-pandoras-digital-box-the-blog-series"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16578"}],"version-history":[{"count":68,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23131,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16578\/revisions\/23131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.davidbordwell.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}